excerpts from energy

The issues here are as big as this entire humanity on earth/ but it is equally as small, as every individual life, and whether you work for life, or against it. To believe you have no impact is wrong; you do use resources, create pollution, etc. To believe the future is not in our hands, is wrong: WE HAVE made these choices/ these threats to be real; one individual/ every follower; at a time. Now is the day, to decide our future. Anything less, brings chaos. It’s a choice. REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, is a people’s right/ to participate, rather than be ruled. This is a DEMOCRACY, where redress of grievances is THE LAW.

Because a tiny few said: "Let us bring the fire on the sun here TO THIS EARTH! The national ignition facility NIF (with 500 trillion watts of power), and 192 lasers all surrounding and focused on the same spot in space and time”. Quote: NIF will achieve....180 million degrees F/ .....only three places in the space and time of our universe have ever produced anything close to these conditions: the big bang, when the universe was a primordial fireball: the interior of stars and planets, and thermonuclear weapons. A supernova is...18-54 million degrees F....the extreme density at NIF is larger than that achieved by a core-collapse supernova-an exploding star- or when two neutron stars collide. They continue experimenting today, which means at any time, life on earth can be lost forever.

Their entire theory, boiled down to its reality is: "not enough gravity here to sustain an atomic fire". Is enough to risk all life on earth. This is their defense for bringing that fire as the sun; here/ that “ it will extinguish itself.”

Not a game, if that fire does not put itself out: then it grows, and consumes the earth; it burns atomic bonds: which means EVERYTHING is fuel for the fire. That fire, will eject our entire atmosphere in roughly 40 days. They DO bet our lives on what is literally a one time; we attained ignition, experiment/ NO going back! We cannot put out a fire that is 8-10 million degrees hot, will be miles high/ with flame spurts said to reach 12 times farther, than the distance of our moon to this planet. Which means we live or die, as a planet/ based upon their theory!

ARE YOU WILLING, to let them be WRONG? THAT is the summation of this work/ an excerpt expanding from these sites From here, the term “fusion” is used mostly as an interchangeable definition; called correctly an atomic fire. Because university taught you to believe.

FROM ME IN OPPOSITION: the next step if contained is the creation of a black hole; if not fusion. The process: if the energy absolutely cannot get out/ and more pressure is applied than the environment can withstand, then it must turn inward, and that is what creates a black hole, or dark matter as a result; "for every action/ there WILL be a reaction". Is that not so! The limiting factor in the creation of a black hole is the amount of energy being reversed.

Idiots suggest/ scientists gamble our entire world on: it takes extreme pressure and temperatures to sustain a fusion fire (therefore safe)/ because they believe "the sun burns from the inside out". But we see no fissures. HOWEVER the primary evidence OF, the processes on the sun, in reality are already discovered. That a dying sun (getting ready to explode) goes supernova, and as a result expands to more than 3 times its current size. For this to happen: the core/ mass of the sun must add more fuel to the fire, to increase intensity.(fires grow). For more fuel to be burned than previously, as a supernova proves. It is absolutely impossible to believe the sun "burns from the inside out". If it did, all the fuel in question would be already engulfed in flame/ burning quickly; it does not. The evidence of a supernova, ultimately and without question proves this their theory is in doubt. But there is no doubt regarding what a fire released on earth just like the sun will do: just look at the sun. The evidence of reality as to what does happen on the sun with fusion is: heat expands, just like the flame on a candle: therefore we know, that the flames are lifted off the surface of the orb/ causing the fuel to be vacuumed up: not fire held down (completely contrary to thermodynamic laws) by "their delusions of gravity: which they don't even have a theory for". The element of note here is: a solar flare represents a "soft spot" on the surface of the sun, more fuel found/ while a sun tornado does represent a"hard spot" on the surface of the sun, an area not being vacuumed up normally.

The foundation of most current thinking regarding fusion is exhibited in the assumption that it is fusion that comes from a nuclear bomb. However what is necessary to understand in this scenario of threat is: that NIF does NOT represent an explosion expanding to release that energy/ but a machine deliberately containing that explosion to mimic and exceed the temperatures inside an exploding supernova star; to contain the energy. An experiment in contrast to the claim a thermonuclear bomb is the same fire as the sun.

Neither is the assumption that combining atomic environments into more complex elements is what creates energy as heat. While it is true that atomic nuclei combined into different elements does or can release heat, IT IS NOT the making of a new molecule or element that releases heat. IT IS THE INTERFERENCE GENERATED, by adding into or subtracting from the orbital arrangements of an atom that causes heat to come forth. The rhythms/ balance/ disciplines/ and stability of the whole atom/ each atom: is interrupted and influenced to remove energy, and from that energy releases heat from the outside (electron field) atomic environment: that is heat, from a chemical reaction. NOT the end result which is a different molecule or element/ but the degrading of atomic stability for a length of time. A chemical fire destroys molecular attractions, releasing the elements involved from their chemical bonds. That functionally means: an element which is a different combination of protons and neutrons assembling into a unique expression of atomic construction; does not fundamentally change, even if some energy is wasted by the fire. Regardless what we see in a chemical fire is the bonds being broken, that hold complex assemblies together. Or more simply: your body is a complex chemical structure that is made out of a few elements and combinations of elements such as is water. Throw it all in a bucket and it would look basically like a little mud, in the bottom of a ten gallon can of water; not life. But add in molecular structure, plus life; and we get an entirely different reality. Take away the molecular structure (complex elements bound together as one identity, by order/ balance/ and disciplines), an the body turns to ash, and vapor; because water escapes. Or in a chemical fire you remove the order, balance, and disciplines from the structure/ but leave the base atomic structures alone, as they are separated in a different reality of physical space.

Heat from a nuclear fire, is the degrading and dissolution of bonds that hold the proton and neutron nucleus/ casting out electrons to discard the whole together. In the case of the sun and planetary orbit: the remaining neutrons now freed, is attracted first to the remaining mass of the sun itself/ and secondly to all other mass close enough to be influenced: that effect/ represents solar gravity itself. Therefore it is the fire on the sun that presents the greatest gravity in this solar system. Not the mass. A greater mass attracts a smaller mass, because there is more degradation, of the nuclear environment; wherever there is more atomic nuclei, in motion. The sun is NOT hydrogen, held together "by magic". The sun is a dense rock, being dissolved by fire because the atomic energy of individual orbiting electrons are removed: thereby releasing the potential energy that is a proton at its core, by the resultant chaos, which "shakes the proton"to be melted; to dissolve the substance into heat. That does create a rhythm. We turn to space and understand it is not “nothing”/ and does contain immense amounts of wave generated particulate’s/ along with energy waves at various intensities. Or more simply it is an environment, which does contain stuff! As in all fires (the destruction of atomic order/ balance/ and disciplines, creates: The debris field left that is ejected from the sun. Which consists of whatever can survive the fire. The smallest/ lightest potential element/ that then re-assembles itself beyond the flames; and even smaller particles; with an immense amount of electrons that are simply freed. Photons of light are little more than the result of electrons freed/ but the energy which pushes them into space is directly from the result of atomic decomposition. The cause and explanation of why can a photon keep its illumination over time and distance to this earth and beyond is: the result of proton rhythms, which retain an effect. Changing the electron into a photon by shaking it. Electricity in AC current is much the same energy; the rhythm is called frequency. As we proceed into space, the question of gravity is more complex that simply stating dark matter/ dark energy (the neutron) is responsible. For simple purposes: you must grasp, that an atomic nucleus is an extreme amount of energy that can be released as heat/ which must be balanced by an extreme amount of “opposite energy” which will contain the heat; or neutron. Electrons sustain an individual environment. It is a law of physics: to achieve balance and maintain a constant state establishing the potential of energy/ there must be an alternate source of “opposing energy” to contain and balance the effects. In the energy waves that emanate from the destruction of balance, there are severely restricted lines similar to lasers resulting. You can see them by focusing a mirror in the sunlight and reflecting it into the shadows. The reflection is “tightly controlled”/ and varies little from the size of the mirror. Not the same with man-made light, which is an initiating energy release that is dependent upon environment to sustain, particularly gases. The direct lines of energy as is shown by light, constitute a force being directed against whatever objects they do hit. That force then surrounds the object and creates an effect; similar too, a car driving in atmosphere: there is a force pushed aside or around at the front/ and a vacuum sustained by turbulence on the back. Turbulence is caused by the energies of space in the form of waves, that are being moved or redirected/ this functionally causes the planet to spin. The grip of solar gravity, and the speed of our revolutions as a planet; are elements that will just add to the horrors of university delusions.

The debris field of this fire being ejected: therefore viewed as hydrogen, and less: is a result of the flame, NOT a composition of the orb/ or a fire within itself.

NIF SAYS: they do expect their "star" shall produce 100 times more energy than they put into it: they say they attack the atomic environment of the target: with 1000 times more power than all the electricity used in the USA during the same time. Its stored and released in an instant.

In its simplicity: NIF is an experiment in what the consequences of heat energy can do. Those consequences are: it can create fusion/ and fusion will sustain itself, because it is the atomic bonds burning (a bit like a chemical fire where molecular bonds are burning); and there is an endless supply of fuel here/ which means once started we cannot put it out, and will become just like the sun. The earth simply a "lake of fire". There are other consequences: by controlling the atomic environment and "suffocating it" with energy through heat: the energy will try to escape: that is literally what keeps us alive during any nuclear event. The entire purpose of nif, is to contain the nuclear environment and not let it escape. That leaves us with three potential options/ but no more, because it is a simple environment. Fusion/ one of the lasers fails and allows escape; creating an explosion commensurate with the energy being used (the law is, for every action/ there will be an equal opposite reaction)/ and if sufficient energy and pressures are created (they can do so), the next step if contained is the creation of a black hole. A potential because they intend to switch to their military purpose which is to explode “small pieces of atomic bomb materials; to see if they still work.” Because if the energy and mass are sufficient & absolutely cannot get out/ when more pressure is applied than the environment can withstand, then it must turn inward, and that is what creates a black hole, & its dark energy/ dark matter as a result. Under anything close to full operation nif WILL establish one of these three results, if they are allowed long enough to play. Fusion the world dies in fire/ a black hole and the whole world will be sucked in, believe it or not/ an explosion massive enough to duplicate the energy being used could easily extinguish the entire San Francisco region; creating a shock wave and potentially dumping massive "disturbances in the ocean", through earthquakes that would then be felt across the ocean as a tidal wave. Such is your experiment/ and you CAN understand this simple association of facts. That means it is a choice, and you allow it to exist at the risk of an entire world. Idiots suggest: it takes extreme pressures to sustain a fusion fire/ because they believe "the sun burns from the inside out"; an apparent fools paradise, as they have no other means of identifying fusion for themselves. But we see no fissures/ no means of identifying "hotter area's and colder ones" as this must occur if indeed it burns from the inside out; pressures will move and vent where they can; another law of physics discarded by university. But apart from all the evidence in this/ the primary reality already discovered is: that a dying sun goes supernova, and as a result expands to more than 3 times its current size; becoming much more intense. THAT MEANS, in simple terms for this to happen: the core of the sun must expand. To expand, the mass exposed must be heated farther than it has been. That means the inner core of any sun is much cooler than the outer surface where fusion occurs is. And that means it is absolutely impossible to believe the sun "burns from the inside out". The evidence of a supernova, ultimately and without question proves this is not so. There must be new fuels introduced to increase a fire, pressures, and its heat.

Bringing the same fire here as is on the sun:

Lesson one is: your scientists do not know what gravity is/ they assume it is simply one mass attracting another/ and yet cannot explain why that happens. That is their fact.

Yet their entire theory of why fusion is “safe”/ is based entirely upon the assumption extreme gravity is required to hold fusion, to create fusion, to sustain fusion, and thereby safe to bring here/ because the earth does not have enough gravity. That is their conclusion. We supplement that with: their idea of gravity is “something magic” happens at the core/ everything that is gravity is sucked in here where heat and pressures WOULD keep everything out. And there explanation is: that the heat and pressures just evaporate whatever gravity is. Or more simply gravity is something without mass/ which contains immense amounts of energy even though it has no substance. Because “gravity” cannot simply “race into the core” and accumulate! Isn’t that so/ something must then get rid of it/ so the next batch can come in: isn’t that right? So it must then burn; or their pretend fire has something to do with it. Yet if gravity exists at the core by fire inside/ why do we see fire: would it not also be sucked in? Why would we see flame spurts a million miles and more long; if gravity were so powerful as to “suck in the planets”.

So there theory is just a pitiful guess, and that guess risks every living creature on earth, as well as this planet itself/ that is dependent upon destroying their own laws of physics. As to math, like a second set of books; it can be made to appear any way you wish. Particularly if you don’t understand the language/ and if you do: then you know that your job, your pride, your power, your everything depends upon fooling the public any way you can. No traitors allowed, “in this man’s army”. Or the public won’t pay up/ but hey , “counterfeiting solves that problem” so who cares. Unless its big!

This mountain of knowledge is granted to establish no more lies/ no more gambling with life or planet; because the people now have the “foreign language of math” removed. When challenging the university, DEMAND no more math in terms of defining and explaining what they mean. Math is only used to measure/ it can do nothing else. Which means it is of little substantial value to life itself. I explained and defined, so a majority can understand/ they can too!

The understanding here is: that gravity begins in the simple statement, “as we know it, gravity is a very weak force; with a cumulative effect”. If it were not so, we ourselves would be sucked into the earth/ by the effects of gravity as would be needed to create planets revolving around the sun; established they believe; by this same gravity.

Therefore they say, that the sun is so extremely massive, this can then exist; or everything must be “the mass”, including the fire/ no difference. To compensate for the fact, even as massive as they believe it is/ without extreme internal mechanisms that dissolve everything at the center of the sun by “fire”; there still is not enough gravity to hold the solar system in place. Which they suggest means simply, the entire sun is engulfed from the center out, by fire; not one thing remains of the sun, that is not on fire; by their theory.

So they bet your lives and this planet again, on the assumption: that what works underneath our feet/ is the same as what works to keep the solar system in place. It is not.

Gravity exists by the simple mechanism: every mass takes up space. Or more simply, if it exists physically, in any form (as we know it to be)/ then there are effects that can be found. The next step in understanding gravity is: that your body is made up of trillions of atoms, and even far more electrons. Conceiving of the earth itself means, these cannot be counted, or even assumed, because it is so many. So there is no lack of atoms and electrons on this planet/ an important consideration, because we know fusion burns atoms; which makes this planet, and everything on it; entirely made of fuel/ and distinctly a “different place”. What is consistent in the atomic environment is, “its moving”/ even if you can’t see it. When atoms “mix to become molecules, or bump into each other as is consistent at any temperature above absolute zero”/ electrons are separated and become freed for at least a time. Because they have an electrical charge/ that charge is released to act and attract in different environments. When electrons are moving through their atomic environment’s (not limited to, only one description; as are the evidence of waves in space), they create change. When change occurs, physical mass moving at the speed of light or beyond, as electrons do; is affected/ because they are atomic structures too. So then when a mass is moving through time and space, with energy/ it becomes a drag, or an effect; on what surrounds it/ or collides with it/ or attracts it. That “suction” (for simple understanding; but different, as it combines both mechanical and electrical realities) / is similar to what we know. Atomic constructions, that bind into molecular structures because of these actions; or when forced; release an incalculable amount of electron moments/ these movements instead of an atomic fire; construct the gravity under our feet. It is not, what holds the solar system together/ but it does “weight the earth”. At absolute zero, which is a minimum of atomic movements: anti-gravity effects have been shown.

Lesson two. The solar system itself does revolve around the sun as we know, from the “university”/ therefore something about the sun itself does cause that to happen. What is obviously different about the sun is, that it is on fire. Not the kind of fire we have here/ the sun is engulfed by fusion; we have molecular fires. Or more simply, the combination of elements, at a non-atomic only scale: as are molecules, give us the fire we know. Which allows the burning of molecular bonds to destroy, or alter the substance of complex strings bound together. That breaks down molecular strings or structures into composite parts. After the bond created by environmental expansion, “a sub category of energy” which holds it together fails. Fusion burns the atomic bonds that form an atom, a very different reality/ thereby releasing the composite parts of the atom itself, that are not burned; which are called proton/ neutron/ and electron. Also courtesy of the university. However to understand the next part you must first understand the reality of atomic environments.

Lesson three: what is known about atomic structure as is called a proton/ a neutron/ and electron; each is an individual unit of the whole? They exist in an environment which is created by the substructure of the whole: or more simply at a base level, there is an attraction between these parts, which holds the unit together. That which fundamentally allows or rejects the entire structure to grow into different elements (proton accumulation) by accepting more mass, is a primordial issue/ thereby growing an electron field; or rejecting it is functionally separate. The electrons fundamentally defend the environment which is now closed, as mass. This is now a separate identity in atomic space. The entire environment spins, and that effect functionally gives it a much greater energy as momentum than it could otherwise contain.

So then the question is: HOW does a proton/ neutron/ and electrons functionally form this environment? What is its secret? To understand that/ you must first understand lesson four.

Lesson four: the law of physics is, that for every action there must be an equal opposite reaction. That means in very large explosions such as are represented by a supernova “sun explosion”/ the reality of the mass, and the propagation of violence as caused by the explosion; does not allow all the energy to escape fast enough. In some cases/ that energy MUST then turn back upon itself, and become a black hole. It is the law: for every action there must be AN EQUAL reaction; which means if the energy cannot escape/ it must then do something else.

Thereby we know, that a black hole as is seen at the center of galaxy’s exist because the energy of a massive explosion, simply could not be expelled fast enough, for the mass, or the energy at its core: to simply get out of the way.

The second law of physics involved is: that thermal dynamics require expansion for heat to exist/ or a pressure rise. The consequence of that is; mass trapped in place, at the center: by a supernova explosion or,“big bang”: is expanding rapidly away by increasing pressures. But if it cannot do so fast enough: The demand is SOMETHING MUST GIVE. Which means, if the energy and mass cannot get out/ then it must turn back upon itself. That fact/ that reversal of energy and mass toward the center instead of escaping outward, which was impossible; then becomes “dark energy/ dark matter”. The reality of construction allows, that an intensity such as this has then altered space and time/ becoming its opposite: the absence of space within the structure itself. The inability to be measured; because there is no gap. An energy flowing in the opposite dimension of time, which is “not measurable/ not destructive, in the physical sense we know it as/ and is substantively always “headed toward itself”. Or as its beginning demands: it must turn all energy back into itself/ instead of releasing it into heat or out, into space. A black hole however cannot contain all that energy within itself, as it draws more in than it can condense; some escapes through the center hole, into space. The center is where all forces meet/ the consequence of that is: if the energy cannot be contained, it must then be released, or the entire structure fails. In essence, what happens with the “big bang itself”. The center closed, and the force of an energy contained (pressure rise) caused the entire structure to collapse at once.

So then: The answer to basic solar gravity is as follows: what holds an atomic environment together is the neutron ( dark energy/ dark matter, that cannot be measured because it condenses energy, from either the big bang or a black hole). We know this is true, because for every action there must be a reaction/ and there is energy and mass moving in an atomic environment; which means there must be an opposite energy/ attraction; within that environment, or the proton energy, nor its mass could be contained.

As it is more simply understood: if you have a tremendous amount of heat energy contained in a tiny environment/ then to balance that environment, something Disciplined such as cold (or its “alter identity/ neutron”) must exist or the pressures will escape; they cannot be contained.

Therefore from the atomic bomb, “courtesy of the university”; we know a tremendous amount of heat energy exists in an atom/ as is proven by the atomic bomb. Yet these atoms exist all around us, and within us; by NOT releasing that energy. Which means, by its composition: there must be something that equates to an equal or greater amount of “cold” (opposite effect) involved. If we expand that property, we find electrons orbiting a mass called the proton. The ability to sustain electrons in orbit, the possibility to grow a mass as is called a proton(s) within the atom; is entirely governed by how “un-massive, the neutron is”. That is “the math” so to speak.

The creation of electricity as is called the negative charged electron and the positive charged proton constructs a relationship that is defined by spin: one turns forward/ the other turns backward; so to speak. The net effect within an enclosed environment is, a fundamental turbulence. That turbulence defines an action, and a reaction, that becomes both positive and negative effects. Doesn’t really matter which way either spins; but there are subtle effects. The environment is the neutron/ protected by electrons, to keep the debris out.

So then we return to solar gravity and recognize that fusion invades the atomic environment releasing each composite piece, while substantively burning both the electrons and protons, with physical forces. The neutron escapes relatively unharmed, to become something like, “the solar wind”/ that works in reverse. This is actually solar gravity or what holds the planets to the sun; the release of “dark energy/ dark mass (neutron)”. The fusion fire fundamentally creates the effect of that release/ but is not limited to the burning of mass, outside of the fact it is fuel for the fire.

Instead it constructs the use of energy itself, which is: a fundamental depicting two critical realities of existence. That which “cannot get a grip, so as to remain in one place”/ and that which cannot be freed, from the forces which interact; thereby contained in time and space. The “slick one” is energy. The contained one is mass. Both exist; one as time/ the other as space itself. The critical question is: what does existence mean?

The functioning answer is, a rhythm. Rhythms are “shadowed reflections” of an opposing world. Every existence has the composite construction of a shadow when exposed to light, or any force other than itself. So the question becomes, what is the functioning relationship between a shadow and a distinction called time. We begin with “every shadow” has a reflection as well. You can see it, but you cannot touch it/ cannot “grip it”, as it has no means to become anything other than “occupied space”. So the question becomes: what is the difference between an existence in time, and its relationship to “the essence of what cannot be discarded”. Because it is a force that applies to the reflection or existence, of everything that has mass/ time.

Time is a construction of measurements. If no measurement can be found, then it is conceived as eternal; or dead/ unless an energy exists. Rhythm means quote “an ordered recurrent alternation of strong and weak elements in the flow of sound and silence in speech”, a pattern of movement or fluctuation. So we must ask the question: what is movement first? The answer is a difference between “hot and cold”. Wherever thermal fluctuations exist, there will be rhythms associated with the transference of heat. But order asks: why, does heat or cold exist? The answer explains, without time: there is no difference in identities between movement or mass. Without measurement, they do appear to be identical. It is the measurement (time), that identifies both energy and mass/ even though they do exist in separate realities. So the question then turns to time itself, and asks: WHY? But why, is a development of thought/ and thought is a reflection of greater things than energy or mass. Thought constructs the boundary, and delivers the law that separates and identifies existence itself. The alteration between the composite definitions of a reality and its shadow, offer the greatest hint at the distance time embraces. Distance is, the elemental conception of a journey; a separation that exists. Time is the construction of that journey, by its own means: The laws that allow movement. When “a shadow and its elemental reality” are separated by time, the force used to hold them apart; is energy.

So we begin again on the theory of gravity that the sun is extremely massive, and thereby the anchor itself, in solar construction; as mass. Thermal dynamics, or Thermal expansion means that the fire seen on the sun has grown apart from its source fuel/ because it must, or be turned back upon itself. Consequently the fire by expansion lifts from the surface of its fuel. As is plainly seen with a candle. The sun is not, “the functional reality of its flames. Instead clearly we know by thermal dynamics; that the energy has expanded enough to allow room for itself on top of the flame, of wicked up fuel. Heat expansion requires it/ the greater the heat, the more room required. Because this is a sphere, we know that the expansion is even greater than what would normally be seen here on earth, because there is no place else for that expansion to go, other than out. Like a flame on top of a candle/ the heat expansion rises above its fuel source, by a substantial amount even at a temperature change of roughly 450 degrees F. Your scientists proclaim that the aurora, outer edges of the sun’s flame are millions of miles long and millions of degrees F hot. That means, the actual mass at the center of the sun CANNOT be anywhere near the mass they believe it is/ because thermal expansion will not allow it. It is a law of the physical universe.

Lesson five: your scientists theorize that the mass of the sun, is extremely hot at its core. They base their entire conclusion about gravity on this illusion. However the facts cannot support that theory, in any shape or form. If the core was on fire, then the entire mass is being consumed, all at the same time. IF THE ENTIRE MASS is being consumed at the same time/ as is a house on fire, all at the same time: it will be reduced to ashes quickly/ and will not be sustainable for long periods of time. We know the sun is relatively speaking: about as hot as it was several thousand years ago, by written human history; therefore we know that the relationship between a sustainable fire, and a fire that is literally out of control is determined by how much fuel is being burned/ at once. To retain its fire at a constant level, for these thousands of years: it cannot be consuming all its fuel at once. Rather that fuel is suctioned up, in the flames above.

Lesson six: in the reality of a supernova, as your scientists state, “they know”. The first part of that reality in time and space is: for the flames of a sun to grow in size, they must expand in heat and pressures. Therefore we know, that MORE FUEL is being burned. Simple as that, no other physical force can cause this effect/ therefore proven true. For more fuel to be burned, there must be fuel available that has not been involved in the flames before. That means the core cannot be burning as your scientists say/ unless they can prove as they suggest: the heavier materials are last to be burned at the center core. Which would mean: somehow the lighter/ less dense materials such as hydrogen would be burned first. That is contrary, and in open denial of gravitational pull/ and thereby unproven or dis-proven by their own theory. Because heavier materials sink to the bottom/ center first; is that not so; “ask a gold-panner”. Consequently for a sun to burn as they say: it must consume the heavier materials first/ because that is what is available at the core. Leaving only less energetic materials/ with less gravitational pull for last. So they have defeated their own theory. Even so, the composite description demands a major explosion at the end of this cycle: without “dense explosive materials” how is that possible? Again proven wrong. When only the lighter materials are left, it is simply a flame dying out, smothering itself so to speak/ and the mass that is left; turns cold.

Lesson seven: your scientists declare, “that the sun is made out of hydrogen/ a gas”; because that is what their spectra-graph shows (lines that show a chemical signature, in a machine dividing the physical view of light). There is no doubt as to the fact that the most common “release of ash” so to speak, during a fusion fire is the least massive or most simple combination possible in atomic environments. Because everything else has burned away. Not a lot of pollutants coming off the sun from that fire/ which means nothing escapes, but the simplest elements, most of which can be reformed as they escape. The simplest elements possible to reform; are hydrogen first, and some potential helium. Or more simply the sun is NOT made of hydrogen/ the hydrogen seen is simply the result of the fusion process, the reassembly of what is left: its “smoke” if you will/ which turns out to be hydrogen. Their claim of actual fusing hydrogen into helium falls short, because if that were true: then basically the majority of what comes off of the sun, or visibly seen in the fire would be helium/ particularly at its cornea.

So then lets review: your university diplomas/ with your political leaders providing your money: are gambling this entire planet and all life on earth/ BASED UPON the simple theory, “there is not enough gravity here on earth;” to allow fusion fire to continue burning.

They consider it to be, a repeating explosion, they can control: that simply continues on as fire only consuming the fuel they present. Rather than an actual explosion the alternate of their conclusion which then expands so rapidly it cannot be contained as fire. Neither is true. Which means to them that such an extreme gravity exists, a pressure turned against itself; so immense that it melts the core; which holds the fire to the sun. That inward pressure does not exist in our reality, unless you consider vacuum. Space is considered to be an absolute vacuum/ although it is not. Nonetheless by their established claims: the vacuum of space is the closest known reality, that could construct their version of gravity; and yet nothing about the sun suggests energy turned inward.

The critical review of fire however, even here on earth where we know the difference between a molecular fire, as is common fire/ and a molecular explosion as is seen in such things as TNT, and its atomic version the atom bomb; are not the same. There is a difference between an explosion, and a fire/ the energy release is entirely different. Which means the situational realities are also completely different. They assume that a thermo-nuclear bomb is fusion released; because of the energy/ rather than a fission bomb as is considered to be the first atomic bombs used. However, where is their proof?

We begin with the simple knowledge: to sustain anything/ everything cannot be involved at once. Something must be left to continue. Therefore the fire that is on the sun cannot be “all the fuel used at once. Some must remain “untouched” for later usage. An “explosion” cannot be sustained, because if it is represented by “the same fuel” throughout; as is atomic construction. Then the explosion will migrate through the same; and all will be engulfed at realistically, the same time. As is the case of a supernova event. The process of Fusion is then, something else. Fission is the existence of “an atomic environment being used like, a person/ proton: targeted in a dodge ball game”/ the effect is a release of energy in measured amounts. So long as the effects do not get out of control. When they do, you get an explosion, or meltdown because the energy release is too substantial to contain or sustain the structures; it invades the entire composite; multiplying effects as it goes. When you multiply the intensity of energy release as is a thermo-nuclear bomb by degrading the bomb materials so badly: “they barely retain structure”; the energy release is also multiplied because of that weakening. It is however the very same basis and foundation of atomic energy, that creates the effect; fission/ not fusion. Its just “super-charged”. Not fusion at all.

Lesson eight; to review the physical foundations that create fusion fire, and establish a base of critical minimal understanding. WOULD OPEN the door to allowing men or women who are so deluded/ blind/ and foolish; “utterly insane” they gamble with an entire world: to their creating that fire immediately. A world lost. Therefore it shall NOT be done. You have enough information here, to help you understand, being wrong is a true possibility. A fundamental reality!

If you search within your mind for a relationship with truth itself/ you will understand all you need to know: to decide if “your gods/ the cult university knows;” should be allowed to continue gambling with this entire planet.

LESSON NINE: YOU KNOW WHAT FIRE IS. YOU KNOW, WHAT THE SUN IS, BY ITS EFFECTS. YOU ARE TOLD, by your own scientists, “this is the same fire” as is on the sun, that we are trying to bring here. THEREFORE YOU KNOW, what happens if that fire is ignited, and it does not go out as predicted by your scientists. This planet then becomes a “lake of fire”/ just like the predictions in the bible. Not a game, not a religious statement: a fact that cannot be avoided/ a flame that cannot be put out/ a planet that is entirely made of fuel!

You figure it out!

But make no mistake, there are machines running today for the purpose of creating fusion. There are machines being built, that will cause the ignition of fusion, right here on earth; in a very few years. End of your life/ end of your child/ end of everything called earth. HOW IS THAT, worth the risk? Answer the question/ and tell someone else: WE MUST STOP THIS! Gather together and insist on being heard. Demand the law of an investigation/ a reality of WE THE PEOPLE to demand: NO MORE OF THIS.

DO, WHAT YOU CAN DO! Or the planet will be lost.

DO SOMETHING, “ITS YOUR LIFE”/

AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

We continue, because bring, wrong is death for this planet

Idiots suggest/ scientists gamble our entire world on: it takes extreme pressures to sustain a fusion fire (therefore safe)/ because they believe "the sun burns from the inside out"; But we see no fissures. HOWEVER the primary evidence OF, the processes on the sun, in reality are already discovered. That a dying sun (getting ready to explode) goes supernova, and as a result expands to more than 3 times its current size. For this to happen: the core/ mass of the sun must add more fuel to the fire, to increase intensity.(fires grow). For more fuel to be burned than previously, as a supernova proves. It is absolutely impossible to believe the sun "burns from the inside out". If it did, all the fuel in question would be already engulfed in flame/ burning quickly; it does not. The evidence of a supernova, ultimately and without question proves this their theory is in doubt. But there is no doubt regarding what a fire released on earth just like the sun will do: just look at the sun. The evidence of reality as to what does happen on the sun with fusion is: heat expands, just like the flame on a candle: therefore we know, that the flames are lifted off the surface of the orb/ causing the fuel to be vacuumed up: not fire held down by "their delusions of gravity: which they don't even have a theory for". Neither is the assumption that combining atomic environments into elements is what creates energy as heat. While it is true that atomic nuclei combined into different elements does release heat, IT IS NOT the making of a new molecule or element that releases heat. IT IS THE INTERFERENCE GENERATED, by adding into or subtracting from the orbital arrangements of an atom that causes heat to come forth. The rhythms/ balance/ disciplines/ and stability of the whole atom/ each atom: is interrupted and influenced to remove energy, and from that energy releases from the outside (electron field) atomic environment: that is heat, from a chemical reaction. NOT the end result which is a different molecule or element/ but the degrading of atomic stability for a length of time. Heat from a nuclear fire, is the degrading and dissolution of bonds that hold the proton and neutron nucleus together. In the case of the sun and planetary orbit: the remaining neutron now freed, is attracted first to the remaining mass of the sun itself/ and secondly to all other mass close enough to be influenced: that effect/ represents gravity itself. Therefore it is the fire on the sun that presents the greatest gravity in this solar system. Not the mass. A greater mass attracts a smaller mass, because there is more degradation, of the nuclear environment; wherever there is more atomic nuclei, in motion. The sun is NOT hydrogen, held together "by magic". The sun is a dense rock, being dissolved by fire because the atomic energy of individual orbiting electrons are removed: thereby releasing the potential energy that is a proton at its core, by the resultant chaos, which "shakes the proton"to be melted. The debris field left that is ejected from the sun; consists of whatever can survive the fire. WHICH IS, the smallest/ lightest potential element/ that then reassembles itself beyond the flames; and even smaller particles; as does become the debris field of this fire being ejected: therefore viewed as hydrogen. It is a result of the flame, NOT a composition of the orb itself.

The people at CERN try to create “another big bang”

a big bang did not happen without structural disintegration. That means: SOMETHING "sliced and diced" the mass to be blown apart prior to the big event so that everything could go at once. That means in real terms "a proton" so energized no physical resistance could oppose that force, existed against it. But tied by "electrons", this force moved back and forth through the mass at tremendous speed. Thereby destroying atomic order (time itself), a little with every pass. A GREATER understanding, is provided at the end of these exhibits. Lacking the intent of a foreign language used to hide it, from the general public; as is math; so that you may understand.

Their reality at CERN: is an environment of extreme atomic de-stabilization/ coupled to an electron mass so extensive: that it can allow a completely different state of energy suspended outside of time, in their explosions. So That electrons WILL retain its connection here. Or more simply: even just one impact that escapes the consequences of time in this experiment, can multiply and influence changes in every other proton that is going through that energy, causing it to grow into an erupt-able plume.

The stage is set with a cloud of electrons set apart from the nucleus of atomic structure, at 7 trillion volts/ considerable electrons are lost, to the surrounding environment; but what remains is "determined". Three things happen when "a train wreck of protons" above or at the energy levels called time are caused to exist. 1. The orbital reality of electrons is moved to chaos, but still connected. 2. The critical structure of a proton/ neutron relationship is changed to become aggravated: relieved of disciplines called time. 3. A separated environment establishes its own rules and laws.

You cannot conceive of more, unless you understand the atomic environment as a whole in time as it is. That relationship is constructed by three separate things as well. 1. In the exploding mass that established a "big bang"/ there is an outer jacket of material, and an inner core of materials: each of which will experience a different level of energy. Because even instantaneous means, the release of structure still requires a breakdown, by force, more severe internally than externally. 2. A black hole is created by energy being turned into itself/ requiring the only possible exit, of a force too extreme to be denied is: that it must turn on itself, and change its own description, becoming the opposite of what it was. As a formation, that is called a black hole; commonly created through a supernova effect. In this particular case however; where all the mass of an entire universe is held together as one entity; KNOWN by the reality of expansion; the effect of an explosion beyond comprehension. The reality of instantaneous presents us with the question: if there was not time to form the structure of a black hole; or, no escape for what could not be transformed/ then an instantaneous explosion followed the first; as the black holes being forced again turned the energy outward. There were many black holes that created spin in each other to the point of disintegration/ then what happened to the energy and mass, forced to turn upon itself in the extreme chaos that was internal to this reality? The answer is: what is called mass/ anti-mass & energy/ anti-energy left the area together; mass and energy in front. BUT, what is a greater "anti-force and level of attraction" coming quickly from behind. Nonetheless both are directionally accelerated. 3. The effects of an explosion are: that what is external the surface becomes an asteroid. Just under, the outer skin), receives the least foundation effects; in this case becoming the electrons (pieces so broken up/ they lose their identity (not mass); but retain an existence (force released, a hole without substance); later becoming a universal dust or haze/ but deprived of an orbit); divided into tiny particles that were pushed by explosive forces to extreme levels of energy. Second is the middle effect, wherein larger pieces of composite materials shaped and filled by the forces exhibited are released, and then bound together/ including a wide variety of very small pieces or the existence of force defined, as in electrons are formed here as well/ spin begins. Third are the internal components which have been altered to cause, or become the explosion itself. Thereby the most vulnerable and most subjected, to extreme conditions: "can't get out, immediately; must endure". And then the secondary explosion which assembles and even greater net effect.

We then take these conditions and examine nuclear compositions today: to understand, in order for an environment to be nuclear, and contain the levels of energy sustained/ there MUST be a force equal to/ OPPOSITE OF, and greater than; the energy being contained. It is called gravity. That force in atomic environments, can only be what is called "anti-matter/ energy". What is otherwise called a neutron (forces and mass which mimic or express what are in effect, "like, tiny black holes/ improperly formed"), which does create the opposing force to contain an electron/ proton. The proton being the force which becomes responsible for environment, the building of mass. The neutron representing balance applied, by causing available mass to enter within the environment itself, until saturated; can’t hold more. The effects described as "positive or negative", are related to spin.

The levels of heat and cold do matter. What is cold, will attach to what is cold, in a hot soup: if it happens quickly. You can actually see this effect, by simply frying "tator tots" in hot oil. Therefore, the middle composition mass, of the explosion: having the least physical effects; because of distance; are found to be of varying shapes and sizes. The question is: what is cold, or heat/ the true physical forms of energy in time and space (atomic dimensions work on a different plane)? The physical existence of an action will result in an opposite but equal reaction is limited to heat or cold. The critical question: what is temperature? The illuminated answer is, an action or reaction that is measured in time, by the forces applied to it. That force being, what is or is not done to the atomic environment/ when confronted with opposing dimensions that must shift, to become integrated, or at odds with the balance of the whole. More simply, the chemistry of time is, the balance or failure to balance of the whole atomic environment. Cold is then, balanced and in a state of sustained cooperation/ while heat is unbalanced, the direct denial of "cooperation", within the components (no rhythms match/ collisions result) of a separated atomic environment. These rhythms of an orbiting field of energy and mass binding together, or separating either quickly or over time, construct the basis of time itself. A distinct definition or measurement, that can be determined by the structure of what is involved.

The elemental dimensions of atomic structure itself are: that forces balanced by what is real in this dimension as mass and energy applied by force/ BUT CONTAINED as a relationship in time, by what is not conceived of as real, in this alternate dimension as is anti-matter and anti-energy. "The space in-between matter & energy and its anti-/ opposite effect": Becomes a three-dimensional state. Becoming Polar opposites, with their result, which is the space called time.

These elements which include and become the primary foundation are: the experience translated between what is real, and what is not real; assembled then as, {visited by the expression called thought}. Thought is, "a living experience".

As extreme energy is then, the critical existence of all those nuclei that have been elementally separated (forced to extreme distances) from their electrons by the reality of force being used, called electricity; the proton becomes an atomic anchor shaken. Better understood as: the relationship between the atomic elements: proton/ neutron/ and electron are governed by rotation. Once that rotation becomes disconnected from the reality of its own rhythms, which did make it an independent atomic environment. The energies associated with that environment are changed as well. The result is, "a proton/ neutron mass" that does not remain stable: "it shakes: due to electron effects in a less symmetrical or organized orbit". The result of that is a mass that works like a chainsaw or sledge hammer/ on common balanced atomic structure surrounding it.

How a wormhole is made

Humans have now made "extreme energy/ as the basis of a kinetic existence (outside the speed limits of light), within an environment that does not allow that action (therefrom beyond time); as a consequence nothing exists (no reaction) to stop it from sustaining itself. Much like an electron sustains itself in a nuclear environment; the rules are much the same. BUT the potential effects are distinctly different due to the size of particles being allowed/ and the range of motion, separated from its disciplines by nuclear law; this "super weapon" is now free. The question is: what can the proton or "energy deposit" of a nuclear environment do here? More importantly: can the proton now accelerated beyond the limits of anything being able to react to its existence, continue on without interference from anything/ will it not heat up? Can it explode, without the element of heat being used? Is it freed forever, and what are the limits if any? Critical to the elemental study of what is possible, is the transfer of heat, from proton to the environment of cold; without an electron shield for balance/ the question becomes, "exactly what does the excited electrons already in this cold do, with an alternate nucleus that now mimics an electron freed; but is not"? There are only two feasible choices: either they tag along for the ride/ or they interfere with the passage of this proton, thereby heating it up. If then it is true, that the proton has nothing that can react to its presence/ in the absence of heat; it would also be true that the electrons in orbit around other atomic nuclei; cannot react to its presence either. BUT if it is true, that this proton represents a stronger draw to the electron than does it "parent nucleus"; then surely that electron will gravitate to the greater draw. The question becomes: does the "super proton" have greater/ or similar speed than an electron? In which case, the proton organizes a march essentially: of an army of electrons as it proceeds. The question of an orbit is abandoned, the balance of power is shifted within a similar situation as is the planets and sun; due to gravity. The larger draws the smaller, even though the distance in space can be great. Unlike the sun and planets, there is no discipline of action/ because there is no consequence called reaction to create time. These simply gang up, like a swarm of insects or such. The question remains: are they completely random, or is there an influence that remains to establish some aspect of order, as an alternate law in nuclear physics. In every gravitational solar system, (galaxy) there is a black hole at the center.... within which a planetary systems reside (an effective order). In this scenario, there will be no black hole created by the effects of pushing proton particles past the edge of time/ HOWEVER the influences illustrative, of a supernova collapse that leads to a black hole will be realized. Or more simply: in a supernova when the atomic energy is exhausted to the point all previous order fails: there will be an reaction equal to the action that preceded it. Or in this case, as is the design of solar systems: a disk of influence will be defined, because the explosion has a distinct direction and at right angles to that direction the debris will flow(mass cannot keep up with the forces ejected/ therefore they spin to the side). The effect of creating a "wormhole"; which is nothing more than an opportunity for electrons to collect in transition from a balanced atomic environment, "to an army"; is fundamental to pushing an accelerated proton past the limits and disciplines of real energy in time. Once past, the disk created by gravitational influences; these are held to the consequence of what a wormhole can do. Like a cord, it hangs on/ because the thread of influence is time itself. Therefore a constant emerges. Time as a constant, emerges as thought/ but time as a constant of energy; conceives of things that cannot be measured, because they exist at speeds so extreme there is no reaction to that speed: in essence then eternal. Critical to the end result is: how does the thread of existence, retain its identity? As energy, the critical existence of all those nuclei that have been abandoned by their electrons; become an anchor. That elemental truth then becomes a line which is attached to an endless action, that returns and returns and returns at unimaginable speed, slicing and dicing the reality of time and its balanced atomic nuclei at it proceeds through this earth.

the terrorists at CERN/ the particle accelerator buried in a mountain, are reviewed.

At CERN, they intend to prove Einstein's theory: that energy is equal to= a mass, times the speed of light squared. But broken down to its facts: that formula is merely the correct formula for kinetic energy= equals mass times speed. Einstein simply guessed at the speed, but did nothing else. No great thing; merely the evidence of an action stopped/ reaction started. But they bet our world on it, without a justifiable cause.

They bet your life on it! Their stated purpose: "to recreate and study, the energies responsible for the BIG BANG"/ THE SINGLE MOST DESTRUCTIVE EVENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE. Here on earth. IT IS, A gamble with this ENTIRE planet that is complex/ but understandable, if you try.

the big bang DID NOT, just happen without a weakening of atomic structure first. Proven by the violence of the explosion: “instantaneous/ the whole thing at once, an entire universe of mass and energy changed in an instant”. Therefore when recreating the big bang/ what you must achieve first, is “an atomic chainsaw” to weaken the entire mass, or planet. At CERN: they continue to attempt to create this, by extreme explosions (quote 16 times more powerful, than an atomic explosion), at the atomic scale (the power of more than one nuclear power plant required, pushing behind it). Their intent is simply:

Physicists are literally trying to bring the same energy here to earth as did cause the “big bang/ single most destructive event in the history of the universe”. An energy so extreme, nothing could stop it until absolutely all the mass in this universe had been impacted and the universe itself was changed forever. An energy beyond time, that cannot be controlled, once released; it goes through the entire earth/ just like the previous “universe of mass” ripping it apart prior to an explosion destroying everything. DAMN, ain’t they smart; HELL, what could possibly go wrong! Answer the question, its just our planet.

Returning too: The reality as is our sun here, proves that these fires, these suns; in fact burn for extremely long times. Which means the fuel inside CANNOT be at the critical threshold of chaos until the very end. Or it would burn only a short time, leaving the universe dark. Because if the intensity of fire at the surface begins in the center of the mass/ the entire mass is engulfed in that SAME heat: Therefore NOTHING exists to expand or change as in an explosive event. That simply is not true of a star as is the sun. As it is plainly noticed, before the big event of a supernova/ the heat and fire multiply by two or three times greater than ever before. Which simply means a far greater amount of fuel is being burned at this time. Not possible, if everything is engulfed from the center out. Further it then explodes, which is not possible if it is on fire in the beginning. An explosion is a state of change that requires an accelerated opportunity, from one state of matter to the next state of matter; as would be a mass, suddenly becoming a gas. To achieve such an immense increase in energy release/ there must be disciplined energy to release. Therefore it is fact, that not all the atomic mass is burning/ or there could be no explosion.

University says, the fire on the sun is: Fusion. However that reality is clearly and without doubt, the burning of atomic bonds. NOT an instantaneous explosion, or repeating explosion as university suggests. But a reality of influence on the atomic scale that cannot be defeated, until everything atomic has been used up; or dispersed from a supernova explosion/ or turned into a black hole, because of the intensity of that explosion. Or more simply: no second chances, no playing with the fire, etc.

Or, MORE SIMPLY as we see on the sun: ONCE A, so called FUSION FIRE IS LIT/ there is absolutely no reason to believe, it will die out, until the laws that govern that fire allow it. THERE IS NOTHING, IN THIS UNIVERSE OF TIME, THAT CAN PUT IT OUT; it kills itself!

Self-sustaining means: it reaches out, from one atomic environment into another atomic environment to burn atomic bonds, growing hotter each time: "Just like a chemical fire, does to molecular bonds here on earth: as the fire we do know." Fire is fire: the difference is similar or same; as seen in the intensity of an atomic explosion versus, a chemical one (tnt for instance). Real atomic fire means: Can't control it/ can't stop it/ can't do anything but die BECAUSE: EVERYTHING HERE IS FUEL, even the rocks and water! (How, you going to put it out)! Answer the question. If your university priests are wrong/ you're dead, as is your child.

So then we again return to this IS our reality, too; and find: IF THEY ARE WRONG/ WE ARE DEAD TOO! OR more simply, these experiments are NOT, "just their choice". The entire planet dies with them, if wrong/ an abhorrent risk so extreme, that it does constitute an abomination predicted in the Bible; Daniel 12. Not a religious statement/ merely a statement of fact! By the prophecy, the operational beginning of that abomination [worst possible decision humanity can make] IS the national ignition facility [their purpose is to bring the same fire as is on the sun here to earth]: NO MORE GAMES, this is their decision for life on earth, propagated through media for all the world to see. You had your chance to say no!

The prophecy goes: it is 1290 days from its to the end of our time, for us all (roughly sept 2015). Not a guarantee, simply "the prophecy: something so horrendous by man will exist, by the hand of men/ that it can and will; destroy an entire planet of life." That prediction stands true: simple and plain. The people get one last chance to stop it (days given), or dead.

So then, we come to the ELI project (under construction/ due sept 2015): which promises quote: the three first lasers will operate at....a million times more powerful than 10 billion, 100 watt light bulbs. [1,000,000,000,000,000,000 watts of heat]. Or one million/ one trillion volt lightning strikes all hitting the same point at the same time. Scientists say: total energy received from the sun on earth is equivalent to about 232,000,000,000,000 horsepower multiplied by 746 watts per horsepower = 173,072,000,000,000,000 watts. OR, concentrated into a pencil beam: more power than the sun establishes on this whole earth: will be focused, in a tiny location (for a few billionth of a second)! Can't be done, NIF exists; are they lying; do you not believe them? They store electricity, and then release it all.

And a fourth laser ...with beams twice the power of these three comes later.

Or more simply, while the abomination called NIF might fail/ or succeed in the next few weeks: creating fusion. By 2014-2015, there will be another set of lasers that promise

a fire so ferocious, fusion is inevitable.

This is what, the "university priests, and their propaganda machines of media: promise to you". What they stole your money for! How: is THIS entire world NOT lost? These experiments worth the price, to you? Additional results are: Which will not take long, by biblical prophecy it takes 40 days. Even so, reality states, because the intensity of that fire; the entire atmosphere of earth, will be lost in just weeks or so/ at wind speeds approaching 200 mph on the opposite side of this planet/ or much more at the miles high fire itself (10 million degrees by some estimates). Another price of being wrong. This planet, then becomes a star/ and as an after effect, it will then destroy our little solar system, as it draws closer to the sun itself. Isn't that what they promise, "to bring a star here"! Indeed it is, literally what they are doing.

quote, “an energy burst, the blasted target generates 500 trillion watts-1000 times the electrical generating capacity of the USA”. & quote; “the force and temperature of an exploding nuclear warhead”. In a suburb of San Francisco/ currently running.

The insane men say, “if we just had the same fire, as is on the sun, here on this earth/ THEN we would have all our problems solved. Their claim is: that fusion cannot be sustained here, because of insufficient gravity! Therefore based ENTIRELY upon this theory ,they DO gamble with our entire planet, and every life! The machine is CURRENTLY RUNNING. One second too late, and the earth is forever lost.

Never accepting the fact, that fusion fire is born out from the burning of atomic bonds: which means everything here is fuel/ once started, it cannot be put out/ and it is NOT dependent upon gravity, but atomic bonds, which once invaded operate as any chemical (molecular bond) fire would! Look at the sun, and ask yourself: DO WE WANT, that fire here/ are there NO risks? It is your death, in “a lake of fire”; for them, to be wrong. It is a fire that burns your skin from 91 million miles away in the summer! So then, lets look at the possibility, that theories are wrong!

We begin:

A supernova is an exploding planetary type star/ a burning sun that reaches the point of no return, when ALL the remaining fuel inside reaches its critical threshold of chaos (no more discipline); and explodes the entire mass, as a consequence. This has been documented as fact, according to scientists.

The question is why does it explode? The answer is, that fusion is the burning of atomic bonds; therefore beyond comprehension fire. NOT A FIRE FROM THE CENTER OF A PLANETARY MASS AT ALL. The reality as is our sun here, proves: that these fires, these suns; in fact burn for extremely long times. Which means the fuel inside CANNOT be at the critical threshold of chaos until the very end. Or it would burn only a short time, leaving the universe dark. The “scientists” here on earth believe that the fire initiates and comes from the center outward, as if nothing stood in the way. How can that be? Because if the intensity of fire at the surface begins in the center of the mass/ the entire mass is engulfed in that SAME heat: and does require venting. The reality, if entirely engulfed is: Therefore NOTHING exists to expand or change as in an explosive event. That simply is not true, as we know a supernova exists, AND EXPANDS tremendously. As it is plainly noticed by the evidence, massive change does occur. Before the big explosive event of a supernova/ the heat and fire of that sun do, multiply by two or three times greater than ever before. Which simply means a far greater amount of fuel is being burned at this time. That is Not possible, if everything is engulfed from the center out. Further it then explodes, which is not possible if it is all on fire in the beginning. An explosion is a state of change that requires an accelerated opportunity, from one state of matter to the next state of matter; as would be a mass, suddenly becoming a gas. To achieve such an immense increase in energy release/ there must be disciplined energy to release.

Therefore it is fact, that not all the atomic mass is burning/ or there could be no explosion/ or expansion. Thermodynamics require that a greater heat, requires a greater space/ or the pressures involved will rise. The law of physics is: for every action there will be a reaction/ consequently we know that once the pressures inside a vessel or mass exceed the breaking point of disciplined energy retaining that environment; there will be a release of energy, one way or the other. Or more simply once the internal temperatures have exceeded the point of no return (the ability to hold itself together) for the entire mass of a supernova sun/ it all blows up. Therefore we know, that the center cannot be long term involved with fire/ because that would have either burned the whole quickly/ or would have made it impossible for the energy release that is a supernova explosion. That end to the fire would also end their claim of gravity as well, releasing the entire solar system.

We return to the fire itself, and use another version of the same thermodynamic principle to understand: as is the flame on a candle/ the heat release WILL search for the expansion necessary to resolve that requirement for space to occupy. When an entire sphere is involved with a flame outside/ then the room needed for that heat to expand lifts the flame from the surface of the orb (just like a candle), thereby relieving some of the pressures that are inherent with that heat. Which means simply “there is an internal empty space between the orb of a sun, and the flames it presents to the universe. Or more simply “the fuel is vacuumed up from the surface to then burn in the fire”. It is when the fuel (mass of the sun) has reached a low point making it hard to vacuum up more/ that the fire reaches down to take more in certain areas. Causing hot spots to form. When a hot spot does not go away almost immediately (as is created by a “soft spot” in the mass)/ that reality of heat is digging deeper, violating the disciplines that keep a balance between stability and fire. When the mass of a sun is heated beyond its ability to retain that balance/ it begins to release mass for the fuel instead of the fire “sucking atoms up, from the rock”. Surface heat causes rock to crack and come apart; hold a fire to a rock and see (with glasses on). Or, in more simple terms: a supernova proves that the center of any long term sun is not on fire/ because if it was, there could be no expansion/ and there could be no explosion. Because there would be no fuel, or state of discipline that could achieve that intensity of change. Simple and plain, a proven fact. Important, because the theory of fusion, and its ability NOT to represent a danger to us is based entirely upon the assumption that the sun burns from the center out.

They are completely wrong. Their decision to gamble with our planet: IS DEATH AT OUR DOOR! Think about it. DO YOU WANT TO BE WRONG/ are they gods (can’t be wrong)?

a tv show called something like the history of the world in 2 hours ( minutes, all I could stand). So lets review just the tiny bit I did force myself to watch, for authenticity of a claim.

They say: all the energy in this universe came about, because one infinitesimally small tiny spot of energy exploded into everything in the known universe today. They know, because of math this is their truth. So lets ask the question: if this tiny less than an atom of anything exploded to become all the mass and energy in this entire universe/ JUST HOW DID THAT HAPPEN? WHERE IS THE PROOF? Add in, just how did an explosion make something more complex/ or how did an energy now called the universe itself (exist as less than an atom) WHERE THE HELL, IS YOUR MIND; damn cult? These failures have an excuse, “they think they’re gods/ schizophrenics can’t help it, they are completely lost”.

What is your excuse, other than believers in their religion? Shame on you.

You are believers aren’t you; you tell me, how did “nothing”/ become everything? Explain it.

They say 13.5 billion years, anything can happen. Where is the proof? Rather lets return to truth in science as a participant in truth of time, and ask the question since we do agree there was a “big bang”. Thereby work our way back in time to what is known: as best we can. We do agree there was a massive instantaneous explosion from one originating location/ therefore all the mass essentially in the universe at that time HAD TO BE, collected together to make it so. We do agree an intensity to that explosion was so immense, NOTHING resisted it. But I say with enough mass, simply changed; to fill the universe in a different way/ they say, a universe essentially, from nothing: both agree everything exploded at once. I say: BUT the reality of mass so extensive; that it existed in a different form requires the whole mass/ nuclear structure to be weakened prior to an explosion; capable of demolishing the entire mass in an instant. To accomplish that as truth/ there must be an initiating factor.

These “ university scientists” just imagine another religion (out of nothing “poof, its magic”). Your scientists have declared “we will create our own “big bang” right here on earth: enter C.E.R.N. The intent to use the power of 2 or 3 nuclear power plants isolating all that energy into one gigantic burst of nuclear destruction; in another game to play god. Gambling, everything started from one tiny spot; creating a burst of energy so extensive it became all the mass and energy of this universe. GEE, WHAT COULD GO WRONG, with that theory/ or playing with all the power of 2 or 3 nuclear power plants in Europe/ for the purpose of an accelerated explosion?

Continuing: Whereas the reality of mass as put forth by me, being infiltrated and weakened by atomic alteration prior to its complete evaporation into “dust”; strongly suggests the creation of a wormhole existed to do that damage. EXACTLY like the work being done at CERN. Or more simply; your scientists are trying to blow up the planet; to prove themselves gods. Satan is the only word that fits, like it or not. Being wrong, is being dead. Dumbass.

One instantaneous explosion we agree on that. Therefore if the universe, or all the mass or energy exploded at once/ fully knowing or believing that all mass and energy flowed from that point outward/ even if in a mostly singular level plane: THE END RESULT of that explosion (by the law for every action there is an equal reaction) there would be, a center/ ignition point left essentially empty; can be found. Because all the mass pushed against itself by the physical law of action and reaction to go in one direction or the other away from itself. Because everything disintegrated, not just some. Consequently if we search for time beginning/ we do understand: FIND THE EMPTY SPOT/ and you find the beginning of this time, in this universe. They did find “the empty spot” what is on the other side of that empty spot is mass moving away from center of origin (the other side of reaction). Therefore a much more accurate picture and time frame does exist, even by their own methods of math. It is not “13 billion years”/ but less than half.

Since they have no clue what gravity is/ other than the attraction between masses; whatever they promise you in gravity is merely fantasy embellished with a little flavor “apples falls”. Hardly “scientific”! Yet in another experiment at NIF (national ignition facility): they gamble fusion (same fire as is one the sun) cannot be sustained here on earth, because “not enough gravity here”. They built a machine, now working to prove that theory. But if they are wrong/ WE ALL BURN!

Rather; as gravity proves itself to be a weak force/ the reality of all their suppositions prove false. BRINGING THE SUN, HERE.

GRAVITY: is a weak force clearly and without doubt/ PROVEN in our own definitions of life, “we are not glued down to this planet; think about that”/ even though our proportionate size would require that to be, if gravity were anything as they describe: (Holds planets in orbit).

Consequently it can be understood, that the sun does not hold the planets in orbit by gravity. Rather our gravity is: simply the movement of electrons in free space/ the movement of atoms in an altered state; establishing the simple phenomenon “all mass no matter how small when moving has energy. When that kinetic energy is moving through an environment & not held within a nuclear framework, it does create a path; therefore if through a medium, it does create a vacuum (a separation in time and fluid and waves/ rejoined after movement as passed). Or more simply those nuclear particles that are not joined by organization to a more disciplined environment; become independent movement “through space and time” establishing gravity. If through space and by time (regardless of the amount) a journey is traveled/ and an impact will be made upon the environment in question. The net effect of all such movement, becomes the quantitative effect of gravity. The reality of spherical mass in the universe is accomplished by this method as well. The strong force is then an altered version of “electrical magnetism (strong)”/ that includes gravitational pull (weak) in a balancing act that becomes the basis of solar discipline; planets and all. And if you wish to hear it, a fundamental foundation in the creation of what is, male and female existence.

Issue is raised as to “an asteroid ramming the earth/ wrecking the planet itself”. To then become both planet and the moon, out of that debris. Almost impossible by all standards of reason; torn apart, is torn apart. It is FAR MORE likely the earth and its moon formed together in close proximity of each other from the beginning and drew together as time passed. Chaos does not build/ but a disciplined reaction does.

In another theory; All elements do not: extend from gigantic explosions simply depositing complex elements on distant planets (where is “the rain of elements, today”/ answer: it does not exist). Rather in gigantic explosions nearly everything is reduced to its most primordial sense: which would be the atomic version of hydrogen. Clearly seen in all scientific studies, as the predominant gas of space. Not complex materials/ these reduced to simple ones; just as explosions do here on earth. Supernovas, the proof that our sun DOES NOT burn from the center out; have been discussed already.

This planet has water/ no other planet has been proven to have water; no matter how hard they try (the assumptions of a tiny speck/ do not count); yet here they say, from space, it rained down water on this planet (oceans full, and more)/ but nowhere else? Because asteroids brought the water! How can that be? Where is the proof. Are asteroids simply “lakes”?

That means something happened here that is extremely unlikely. Show us the evidence this is not so. Water is not a creator of life, any more than is oxygen a creator of life: they are tools and resources. NATURE IS THE GENETIC CODE. Or more simply the factory, run by complex instruction, that gathers materials, sorts and assigns itself as the “boss”/ uses energy, and transforms elements into life by the “blueprints” of what cannot be so simple as the mind that created the religion evolution. Their priests, understand nothing; “like monkeys in charge of an atomic power-plant; the end result is already decreed.” Or as in the religion depiction of evolution: “We shopped/ we picked out what we wanted/ even without a brain.” and declared yourselves gods.

Then destroyed the entire world, because insanity ruled/ governments overrun by fools; instead of truth or life chosen as first. Dumbass! Your university story tellers make a big statement out of sedimentary layering; for evolution. But lets review: sedimentary separation which does not happen in time driven winds; which also does not assemble creatures and plants who die into gigantic piles of the dead. Which means: “their entire stories about the history and reality of this world falls apart”. But that does happen in water movements; which then prove Noah’s flood. Fossil fuels cannot be disputed, in massive amounts, some thousands of feet deep.

The amounts of coal (plant debris buried together at once)/ animal (creature) deaths all buried at once (now oil and gas) much under thousands of feet of earth COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED without Noah’s flood. That is a fact. Simple as that. The amounts establish “a world full of life”/ suddenly ended. Ask the question: “bear any resemblance to you?” The grand canyon/ monument valley; is in fact simply evidence of a “gigantic wash” or ditch or river made when that enormous amount of water left the land. No other possibility exists/ certainly not from the tiny river that exists today.

Or more simply: WHY do you believe fantasy and failures? Asking for nothing/ questioning nothing/ believing anything. Make them prove evolution; etc. Adaption is merely the sign of “perfect design”. Make them stop destroying everything/ take away their power; and reduce your leaders to “just like us”/ as democracy demands. Take away their tools, take away their stolen goods, “our everything”, take away their right to decide the future. QUIT GIVING THEM MONEY/ or letting them steal it! Find truth, & We will all, have our vote instead! Work for nothing less than life must come first/ truth itself must lead now, and forever. No more men leading life on earth/ this reality, this state of threats so extreme we can all die: is the best they did do. The insanity chosen, rather than

LIFE MUST COME FIRST!

If you find a need to know the truth/ then do as the city of New York says for its people to do: IF, YOU, “See a terrorist, or anything suspicious of a bomb or destruction: FOR GOSH SAKE, SPEAK UP”/ and tell somebody until they all listen. Because being wrong here, is too heinous to take chances. Let the world recognize, a true destructive event by the actions of anyone, particularly terrorists.

. Atomic matter on fire/ a fire that cannot be put out, because it burns atomic matter, and everything here is atomic material. If not a massive bomb/ then the end of this earth, by fire. 3 things are worth noting:1. A thermonuclear bomb has not yet created fusion fire, because they cannot contain the nuclear materials long enough to cause them to light. That problem is now remedied with lasers. It will prove true to the purpose, and they will generate fusion fire which will consume the earth if not stopped.2. The 50 megaton bombs that were detonated, were without doubt the last tested in the USA, and if you go back in time to when the treaty was signed, the USA DETONATED THESE within about a month or so. At their most southern site on the Mexico border/ Within the week they said they would detonate, the Mexican volcano erupted in that time. Within a week of the next one detonated, California had an earthquake. Within a week of the last one ““I no longer remember, but it was something equal”” Do check it out

It is completely true, that what you don’’t know, CAN hurt you! As is evident by the rest of this web site/ the reality of attack, even if unintended as to the majority believing no harm will come: is critical and real. The question is: how much damage can ignorance do? The answer is: in terms that invade the basic and real foundations of all life and existence on earth/ stupidity and arrogance and apathy are capable of exterminating the entire planet. Therefore this site is not a game/ not an intent to scare: but a critical and necessary warning, that ““all is not well, with human behaviors or leadership regarding this entire world. We have people working and abusing everything there is/ people threatening every life on earth/ people preparing biological threats that make the worst horror stories look like ““children at play, on a Sunday school ice cream social with their parents all around””. There are clear and deliberate attacks on every resource on the planet. There is an outright denial of responsibilities, whether it is money, population duties, water, poisons or any other decision that humanity makes: all of it is bad/ because the primary leadership of today, “is a toddler” or worse.

LIFE IS MORE than this. I have asked your courts for the law, as provided by constitutional democracy: according to first amendment redress of grievances. Let the people decide for themselves, BY LAW/ not civil war! The courts refuse/ your leaders refuse (every single one). I have asked every form of organization to recognize, the foundation of my complaint here is: that WE THE PEOPLE MUST INVESTIGATE THESE CHARGES OF THREAT, because any one of them can cause our extinction/ THEREFORE WE CANNOT BE WRONG! They all refuse, every single one. I have demanded of the news media: the people cannot be gambled with/ an entire planet cannot be lost, just because a few theorize they can play god. They all refuse, every single one; because they insist, “the university knows”. Even though they plainly state as in the case of the same fire here as on the sun: its just a theory. A theory dependent upon gravity; and they don’t even know what gravity is/ not even a theory; Just an illusion