IN THE ILLINOIS STATE SUPREME COURT

Supreme court building   200 E. Capital Springfield IL 62701

 

in the matter of Champaign county court 11TR22442

coming out of the fourth district appellate court/ Springfield IL.

This trial

 

Case 4-12-0429

Osterbur, James Frank    V.  City of Gifford/ State of IL

 

 

DATED: 6/23/12

REBUKED is:    The court order, "6/13/12,   appellants pro se motion for class action suit DENIED".

 

  The petition at the IL supreme court

 

CLASS ACTION STATUS:  IS A REQUIREMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE"   IT IS, a foundation demand of democracy itself.

IN ANY LEGAL MATTER, THAT INVOLVES US ALL, particularly when a constitutional guarantee is denied, and treated with contempt.

 

 When justice and fair play are ordered "removed from this trial".

or, more simply these legal rights guaranteed by the constitution and sworn by  judiciary: "we will obey".   To WE THE PEOPLE, as our law!

Is NOT discretionary!

 

 

 

 

RE:   THE LETTER DATED 6/26/12

"Cannot be determined under what rules of the supreme court of IL, you are proceeding/ or relief you are seeking".

 

 

In that first paragraph above: all the information you needed was delivered to you.  YOU CAN, AND YOU DID UNDERSTAND, or you do not deserve your position as a court.

 


RELIEF SOUGHT

 Class action status is the purpose of this petition for the people of this state called ILLINOIS.   For this trial case 4-12- 0429.  It is their guaranteed right/ it is their employees who refuse to grant that guaranteed right, and treat it with contempt.  It is their state as we the people, and it is their law, the constitution of the state of IL/ by which all judges and high officials guarantee and do swear to obey, protect, defend, and serve the people UNDER THEIR LAW, CALLED A CONSTITUTION.

JUSTICE IN THE COURT/ THE RETURN OF FAIR PLAY IN THE COURTROOM/ A FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD BY A JURY, a true demand of DUE PROCESS under the law/ EQUAL TREATMENT IN PUNISHMENT by law.   Are all demanded in this court case.  Which does include accountability to the people of this state, by their government employees. 

 

THERE IS NO DISCRETION IN THE COURT, by any judge; supreme or not.  To withhold constitutional intent or law.   That is not only illegal, it betrays us all/ therefore the act of a traitor.  WE THE PEOPLE, have a right to be involved in our law, the employees who serve us under our law, and to know what the people who subject us with rules, are doing to OUR FREEDOMS.

As this trial 4-12-0429 intends to prove.

Class action status/ the right, to review a policing agency operating within the state of IL, for predation.  A clear responsibility of the court itself/ as must then be established by the evidence:   fair, to the citizens of this state,  or not. 

 

 

 

  The foundation of this complaint/ this petition for legal resolution under the laws of ILLINOIS/ and its constitutional guarantee.  The laws of this nation The United States of America and its constitutional guarantees:   are so vastly superior to your rules of the court/ they do NOT belong in the same case.  Your rules are discredited, and your oath to obey and protect the people, through constitutional law, and its guarantees to each citizen are established as THE LAW, THAT DECIDES.  The constitution is the law of this state, and this nation/ THERE ARE NO OTHER RULES, NO OTHER LAWS, NO ACTS OF CONGRESS OR FAILURES OF CONGRESS OR THE COURT:   that are superior to the constitution of either state or nation.  That is the law.


Therefore your actions in returning this petition DATED 6/ 23/12 ARE in violation of DUE PROCESS.   The right of this people to be protected and defended either individually or as a state considering the whole people as one.  Has been harassed.   The intent to "cover up", and hide behind rules:   is insufficient for the law demanded by DUE PROCESS:   so says the fourteenth amendment of the USA.  My jury was stolen from me/ my life is assaulted by the court, as is the term "criminal".  My property is demanded:   because 95% compliance with the rule, "is not enough".  Wherein that rule involved established,  not a single evidence of threat to anyone: IT IS A MATTER OF FREEDOM.   I am treated without respect, regarding the punishment: because there is no possibility a financial demand can be considered the same, between rich and poor/ when NO relationship is held to accommodate the inequality of asset.  The poor are enslaved in direct violation of the thirteenth amendment/ while the rich go free, it matters not, to them.

 

The complaint here is real.  THE FOUNDATION CALLED CLASS ACTION STATUS:   for this people called the state of IL/ with regard to their guarantees/ their protection/ their demand for justice and fair play within the courts:   AND FOR FREEDOM, as is guaranteed for life, not for games or predators whose only intent is to steal, our money, and control our lives.  Is sufficient to understand that every citizen in the state of IL is entitled to understand:   this includes them too!

The disease of rules, rather than justice.  The reality of oppression within the court/ rather than fair play.  The bankruptcy of a failed constitutionally guaranteed citizens right.    Are all sufficient, TO UNDERSTAND:   class action status IS REQUIRED.  So that every citizen can understand what is real, in terms of our democracy.   Section 5 of the IL constitution grants redress for the people.  Trial 11TR 022442 establishes in fact/ through a courtroom:   that there is no such guaranteed right.  Even though it exists for that very purpose in the constitution of this state called IL.  The judge warned of contempt/ should I even mention the word.  Which means that it does not exist, as the constitution intended it to be.  It does not exist as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL FIRST AMENDMENT intended that to be either.  Which does establish without the slightest doubt, by irrefutable evidence:   the judiciary is in contempt of the law.

 


I am entitled, TO EACH AND EVERY GUARANTEE OF THE CONSTITUTION, BOTH STATE AND NATION!   These are the contracts signed by the people, AS A DEMOCRACY/ defining what we shall or shall not give to ourselves!  You the employee did not give them to us/ we the people gave them to ourselves.  We required an oath of office per each and every judge, that swears obedience to the constitution as written: to protect, defend, and obey/ or face the punishment allowed or required by the people themselves. 

I am in court demanding JUSTICE SHALL RETURN to the courtroom.  I am in court demanding FAIR PLAY SHALL RETURN to the courtroom.  I am in court demanding, EQUAL TREATMENT in the handing out of financial punishments SHALL BE required.  I am in court demanding, THAT ACCOUNTABILITY SHALL BE GIVEN to the people;   thereby redress, to assemble the people and let them decide if our employees must give account of themselves and what they have done.  IT IS THE LAW, EACH OF THESE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE.  All of them are denied, by the Champaign county courtroom/ the state and federal courtrooms of this state/ and the supreme court of the USA.  As identified by docketed trials 08-1339 & 11-100 & the illegal  barricades erected to keep extra-ordinary writ 2023 outside the supreme court.

 That is a conspiracy to deny constitutional law.

That is a conspiracy to deny the people of ILLINOIS and the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:   their constitutional right of redress.

That is a foundation of criminal contempt and deliberate organization:  to withhold the law from WE THE PEOPLE.

 


Your rules be damned.  The constitution holds court over you/ by your oath.  Therefore either obey the constitution and deliberately protect and defend the constitution establishing a true and correct definition for the people:   that they may use this law as intended.   Therefore present to this people called ILLINOIS, a courtroom for justice/ a courtroom that deliberately searches for fair play/ and a reality of punishment that is EQUAL treatment to all.   OR REFUSE, and understand that opens the door for treason against this people.  Because it is your job, to stand as a soldier; protecting our lives/ and defending our honor, our securities, and our possessions as if they were yours, or more than that:   belonging to us all.  Should there be no punishment, if you fail?   The law is clear/ the ILLINOIS contract with this people as is their constitution:   IS SOVEREIGN OVER YOU.   This state belongs to us, as WE THE PEOPLE OF ILLINOIS.  It does not belong to you/ you guaranteed obedience and respect to the constitution, and have already failed, by allowing our lives and our securities to become bankrupt/ the courtroom dissolved by rules/ and the jury designed to protect us all, destroyed by a judge that failed to understand: the purpose of a jury is to decide for society/ NOT rubber stamp a rule, but to judge it in context with our needs as life in this state, by our combined reality,  in living.  A rule is nothing more than the means to oppress.   A JURY, is our defense against "the rule/ and its ruler".      Their intended decision is:   to understand the relationships involved and determine what if any considerations apart from the rule shall be applied:  FOR JUSTICE, AS FAIR PLAY AND EQUAL TREATMENT FOR ALL, conceives of, by those who represent us in trial.  This state has failed:  By those representatives who failed us all/ and a supreme court,   that let them. 

The IL constitution forbids that:  

 

section   1: