The element called FRAUD is a fundamental deception fully intended to avoid the truth/ deny the truth/ degrade the truth/ or destroy the truth; so that whatever the foundation of failure actually is; it may remain hidden, or the victim may be enslaved in one form or the other.   310 F. 2d 262, 267.

The return order, from the appellate court fourth district of IL, is a clear and blatant attempt to misdirect, and thereby discard the IL supreme court case that appeals this verdict that they have "remembered".  While it is clear, through the moot actions/ or lack of actions that exist from the IL supreme court: not yet providing any information/ no case number/ no docketing or descriptions of any kind.  The reality here is, a "remembered order" from the appellate court, is a concealment of the IL supreme court filing.  It can only be misdirection in the hopes that I would simply "go away"; being intimidated by the appeals court.  After all, are not most/ its called power: NOT democracy.234 F. supp 201, 203. 

I have come demanding of the IL supreme court that they must adhere to the constitution as written.  I have contended in trial, that there are MANY THREATS which blatantly gamble with our lives.  I have proven, that constitutional law, in particular called redress is not only abandoned by the judiciary;  but exists in a conspiracy to deny this guaranteed legal right of democracy SHALL NOT exist.  Thereby proving a traitorous action exists, and there is in fact anarchy in the court of this state and this nation.  That is constructive legal fraud 38 Cal Rptr   148, 157    437 S. W. 2d   20, 28.  I have come demanding constitutional review/ the rights and guarantees of each and every citizen in this democracy shall be granted.  I have proven in trial, that 95% compliance with the law is not enough; you must be perfect/ so says the judge, and the IL attorney general office who did prosecute that very purpose.   You are not rulers/ you are employees, who swore to obey the constitution, and grant to the people their every guarantee.  You swore to protect and defend this nation, this state, these people from every threat;  and have done just the opposite.  That is treason; or at a minimum aiding and abetting the enemy of democracy itself. 

I have finished with the appellate court, and they know it/ therefore this renewal of an order that is frivolous, becomes a mockery of due process: THE RIGHT and guarantee to proceed to the IL supreme court under constitutional grants, as a citizen protected by the law that is "our government".  Because we the people are the government through our constitutional law.  You have denied that, and now seek to reinstate that denial. What other purpose can there be, other than extrinsic fraud, wherein the demand to keep me from trial becomes more distinct 468 S. W.  2d 160, 163

Fraud in law consists of the assertion:   that 95 % compliance with a irrelevant rule, in a situation that was clearly NON-threatening:   is far beyond justice.  The allowance of the word criminal court, IS far beyond "fair play".  The association of a tainted jury, which was not selected either by the prosecution or the defense but the judge:   who were told distinctly that they could not decide for society, what was equitable or fair.  But must decide if the rule was broken or not/ regardless of the penalty.  They were told, the penalty has no bearing on their decision;   255 N.Y.S.  2d 608, 610/ their actual job, as was to protect society itself.  By demanding:   if this would not be fair to us/ then it is not fair to him.  Based upon the actual situation, assigned and asserted by questions of truth in the police officers testimony; and his record: the assertion of equity in a penalty applied is found fraudulent and unjust.  225 N.E.  2d 813, 814;   109 N.W.  136, 138.  Yet the appellate court desires to enforce, and mimic itself: claiming that constitutional law has no bearing either on this case, or in the pricing of what the constitution declares SHALL be free.  The appellate court discounts redress as in the constitution of both state and nation, and applies   FRAUD IN FACTUM;   whereby I state as written in the constitution, and sworn by the judiciary that they would obey this law/ these words.  The reality is they do play deaf, mute, and dumb.  5 S.E.  2d 138, 141.

The fraudulent conveyance of this entire judiciary is then on display; and attempting to discard DUE PROCESS under the law, both state and nation.  That is fundamentally a betrayal of the people, of this state and nation.  These rights and guarantees, provided by the constitution both state and nation;  being fought for, ARE THE LAW/ they are not "discretionary".  The court knows it, throughout the system; and conspires against this people/ this state/ and this nation without regard for justice, rights, or law.   That in and of itself, has every criminal connotation;   Prove it is not so.

The jurisdiction of constitutional law IS, fundamentally charged upon the judge, in every single court.  But it is particularly strong in the IL supreme court/ or US supreme court; as these by law ARE:   fundamentally governed by the constitution itself.  While the other levels of court do have some discretion, "the supreme courts" do not.  They MUST adhere/ it is their job, it is their oath, it is their duty above the rest.  147 P. 2d 759, 761. 

Instead of that, the IL supreme court sends this case back to the appellate court in a mockery of due process, that intentionally expects will be enough to send me scurrying into hiding; it is not so.  114 P.  257, 258.  At the end of your thirty day grace period to answer, docket, or demand:   this is constructive contempt instead.  The clear and deliberate purpose to say, "the law, the constitution, this democracy, our our authority as we the people who own this state and this nation: HAVE NO PLACE HERE".  THAT IS BETRAYAL, and it is clearly treason against this state called ILLINOIS.   249 S. 2d 127, 128.  The fact that these courts have now joined in an attempt to use the lower court to deny my legal appeal/ to discard the law and dispose of this constitutional case, indicates criminal contempt 199 S.W.  2d 613, 614.  The use of public owned and authorized courts, the reality of employees for this people (NOT RULERS); aligning against democracy, THE LAW;  and this people.  Every constitutional case is, "a class action suit": BECAUSE IT AFFECTS US ALL; because it is the law by which we must all live.

I again demand:   that constitutional law shall stand, for WE THE PEOPLE:   or it shall be proven why not.  Establish this class action constitutional case.

 I demand: this appeal of case 4-12-0429 shall be docketed/ and shall go to trial as a case demanding REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES for the people;   as declared/ as is their legal right.  OR the clear legal description of why it is not, under both state and federal constitutional law.  Because change is needed in the judiciary and all levels of employment: a clear accounting of what has or has not been done against or for this people is mandatory.  As it is proven without doubt the governing officials: in this state called ILLINOIS.  HAVE FAILED us all.

Let the people then decide for themselves, as is the purpose of redress.   If they shall in fact accept this level of fraud, cursed with power and absolute arrogance: or stand up for themselves, and do better.

Let the people decide for themselves:   IF THEIR LIVES/ THEIR FUTURE/ THEIR SOCIETY/ THEIR RIGHTS/ THEIR MONEY/ THEIR NATURE AND EVEN THEIR PLANET;   and everything else shall be gambled with.  Or they themselves shall demand through redress;   what is fair.  As they themselves may add in during redress, whatever shall be tested for truth.  Shall be defined by the  evidence, and then judged as democracy itself (we the people) in charge of ourselves and our state as it is our authority, in true democracy to do that very thing.  It is their right, by law; both state and nation.