AN INTRODUCTION,

These cases were brought forth using the arguments, that "any common citizen might".

The fundamental legal truth, established in these court cases IS SIMPLY: the common citizen has NO voice within the court system of America. Legally right, constitutionally correct, fundamental justice, Equality or Due Process have all been relegated to the "whim of a judge". LAW has been replaced by rules/ Life has been trampled, by the assertion of a "legal education/ PAY THE BILL". Therefore all that is left is the clear & certain charge of monopoly, by the court/ a TREASONOUS act by the United States supreme court. They are charged with allowing justice to "become a toy and a weapon" rather than its constitutional demand:

"WE THE PEOPLE, of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America."

You will bear in mind; the public has, and does, ask these judges "to play god" for them at various times/ surrendering the duty to define and describe for yourselves, the consequence is, pride consumes, and arrogance then rules. Remember your own part, and do better.

The process of trial as represented herein describes in detail, the methods & manners of an average citizen intent upon fundamental truth, & fundamental right. The relationship of the court to its position of authority, "to let the LAW decide, and to hold and maintain ALL constitutional documents as, the HIGHEST LAW", is revealed as more than simply deficient/ the court HAS declared themselves, the authority, and thereby STOLEN the basis and foundation of Democracy.

I explain the cases herein, as a legal correspondence, designed and determined to assess & evaluate the people who do have control over me, and you. This is FAIR, as my life is influenced by their decisions/ it is reasonable they should be influenced by my decisions. Justice DEMANDS reasonable actions by the court/ the court fails. Therefore the court requires lessons in the meaning of FREEDOM, the honesty of LIBERTY, the happiness of JUSTICE, and the integrity of HONOR!

TOO MANY are found lacking, and these cases represent the TRUE MEANING of what the 1^st amendment, redress of grievances does mean! IT IS our right, our authority, and our duty, to preside over the official. To declare and demand adherence to what we have agreed to. The official found corrupt MUST be removed! There rules, their laws, ARE NOT superior to the first amendment/ we hold the final power and authority over all officials. By the requirement of peaceful assembly, careful petition through the collection of evidence and facts, and by VOTE we will determine what this democracy is, or should be!

WE THE PEOPLE, is the ONLY true interpretation of the constitution necessary; within the clear and certain confines of justice and equality!

When the court fails, the nation follows! It is clear, the nations sits upon the edge of monumental distress, look at the case filed, and recognize this is life or death.

The drama of each court case in simple matters of me, was initiated for reference to the reality of constant sources in the reality of law and the american citizen/ the intent in each case is not to harass or antagonize the court, but to establish the truth as to the common citizen and our reality in this united states. The court was led in some instances to allow the freedom of their decisions to elaborate the truth about the system as a whole. The court was never tempted in any way to react to any situation/ they chose clearly and of their own intent. The evidence of common methods and words as might any citizen use to defend themselves in a court system to which they are unfamiliar, lists as reality the demand of the lawyer and court, to PAY ME or be discarded to the trash! This is NOT justice, but amounts to the harassment of society and the intent for tyranny. The questions of society are then deliberate, not to the individuals of the court, as any other might do the same/ but as to the realities of change that would substantially change the system for justice. This amounts to the removal of power, from the court/ by establishing "common citizen laws: those which every citizen might use to defend themselves". This demands no more LIES from the court as to " the judge being above the law/ or above the violence of illicit behaviors/ they are the same people as you and me, and will answer for their criminal acts, as well as their prejudice, bigotry, and other failures". The extreme pride which causes this will be removed, the banditry of the legal profession will be removed, and the asinine intent to make anyone an example proof of a criminal act. The government itself has lost its credibility/ as the truth says: everything is just about to fall into ruins, because all the lies are "coming due". Therefore as described in this case, the people themselves must attain the self-discipline and self-respect necessary to work to resolve all the massive problems they themselves are a part of . You will not condemn your leadership, you DID want exactly what you got/ the lies! The critical test for you, is to determine the truth, BEFORE the reality kills you. You have only a short time to do so, therefore you are advised to be truthful in all things. The cases used have a value to you, they reveal a number of faults and injustice/ but you have very many problems, and whether you believe it or not/ the end of humanity is coming soon unless you yourselves make the decisions necessary to survive. This is not a joke, not a game/ this is your everything!

James F. Osterbur

Issue will be made as to contempt, for this single page. The reality then becomes a distinct display of amendment 9: the reality of fundamental disciplines associated with democracy that define it as a government of the people! NO attempt is made to display the court in less than honorable avenues, HOWEVER the decisions of the court, are its own. The questions that present ARE EXACTLY as the court presents to me/ IF YOU ARE NOT EXACTLY CORRECT, THEN I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU, dismissed or denied. Each matter within the court documents define a specific matter in the law, the court refuses the law/ and enters rules to deviate and destroy due process.

The fundamental legal truth established in these court cases IS SIMPLY: the common citizen has NO voice within the court system. Legally right, constitutionally correct, fundamental justice, equality & due process have all been relegated to the rules of the court/ or the whim of a judge. Law has been replaced by rules/ LIFE has been trampled by the assertion of "a legal education/ PAY THE BILL". Therefore all that is left is the clear & certain charge of monopoly by the court/ a treasonous act. The united states supreme court has led the nation, by allowing justice to become a "toy, and a weapon" rather than its constitutional demand: WE THE PEOPLE...!

The process of trial as represented herein describes in detail, the methods and manner of an average citizen, intent upon fundamental truth & fundamental, inherent right. The relationship of the court to its position of authority, "to let the law decide, and to hold and maintain ALL constitutional documents as the HIGHEST LAW, can be revealed as more than deficient/ the court HAS declared themselves the authority, and thereby STOLEN the basis & foundation of democracy."

I explain the cases herein, "as a legal correspondence", designed and determined to assess & evaluate the people who do have control over us all. This is FAIR, and assembles an alternate influence upon the court. The court FAILS! Therefore the court requires lessons in the meaning of freedom, the honesty of liberty, the happiness of justice, and the integrity of honor. TOO many courts are found lacking, and these cases represent the purpose and the meaning of what the 1^st amendment redress of grievances means to the nation. It is OUR RIGHT, OUR AUTHORITY, AND OUR DUTY, over the official to declare and demand adherence to what we have agreed to. The official found corrupt MUST be removed/ their rules & their laws ARE NOT superior to the first amendment/ WE DO, hold the final power and authority over them all. By the requirements of peaceful assembly, careful petition through the collection of evidence and facts, and VOTE to determine what WE will as a democracy have and do. WE THE PEOPLE, is the only true interpretation of the constitution NECESSARY; within the clear & certain confines of justice and equality. When the court fails/ the nation follows! And the nation does sit at the edge of monumental disaster.

The development of each & every case in jurisprudence is: a simple relationship with law & justice. The transcripts and documents are intended to be complete however no guarantee is made, and a few pages are likely to be missing due to the time involved/ allowance is made to refine spelling errors, and some italics describe a slight clarification. Page numbers refer to trial transcript or what was current to the process at that moment in time.

92-s-2991 considers the fact, that a defendant MUST understand the full legal consequences of any action or actions which may be taken against him by the court. This case challenges the concept & reality of DUE PROCESS by an intervention from the court, wherein the court "notices a criminal act". The defendant is attacked thereby from the court, wherein a civil action is manipulated, to betray the defendant and provide NO opportunity to defend against. It is the court NOT the plaintiff who attacks (the plaintiff words go directly to the car/ the concept that I should have known/ FALLS ON DEAF EARS, from the people who cannot hear anything, if every "concept of a dot, or punctuation mark cannot be understood/ as IS THE TRUTH, about how to get rid of cases through the use of court RULES), and the court is NOT ALLOWED. The court betrays the people! The court is not only wrong in this case, it is uneducated to hear it, if the judge wants to play mechanic he must be qualified [ the defendant quashes the testimony of the mechanic herself, and the judge "doesn't notice"]/ NOT as to the equity due, RATHER as to the consistency of the work, in real terms, "what any other mechanic might do, in the same circumstance.

The constitution of the state of IL section 2 DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION NO person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law nor be denied the equal protection of the laws.

93-0441 assigns the appellate court to "fix the problem"/ this court clearly responds by protecting the judge, and NOT the litigant, thereby establishing a critical failure, in choosing "one of theirs" rather than the LAW! The response of the court is: Failure to comply with rules 342-343. The litigant responds, and the court orders DENIED by rules 341-344. This is an attack by the court wherein they advise by one set of rules and deny by another. Convincing in the definitions of choice, are the Clear & certain intentions of the court to dissolve the litigants right by the reality of dates/ the law provides at least 14 days to respond/ the court provides not more than 4 working days/ they BREAK THE LAW. This is a complete failure by the court.

Official Ill courts commission reports KFI 1725.5 D.5 A5 1992 RULES OF PROCEDURE Rule 3 ...shall advise.......his right to file responsive pleadings....21 days.

Rule 5 ......pleadings. They shall be in ordinary, plain and concise language designed to fairly respond to the charges brought against him.

Rule 11 The process and procedure before the commission shall be as simple and summary as reasonably may be.....

State supreme court 76128 suggests to the court, the constitution HAS NOT been upheld. Therefore specific entries to "Enlighten the court" are provided. The court is UNIMPRESSED, justice denied. The critical failure establishes the monopoly of the court, over the people. The court does NOT substantiate its opinion, it does NOT rule on virtue, constitutionality, law, or other: the court believes it is above justifying its ruling/ "such as a king or queen" dismisses the masses, without comment. The court is a collection of people, given the job: to guarantee the inherent rights of the constitution. The IL supreme court FAILS on all counts!

The state of Illinois constitution: section 1 INHERENT AND INALIENABLE RIGHTS, all men are by nature free and independent and have certain inherent and inalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To secure these rights and the protection of property, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

Federal case 94-2001 attacks the judicial officers of the court, establishing the cause: "MOCK JUSTICE". The court replies FRIVOLOUS! Failure of the court is without compromise/ NO further explanation or citation required, read the case.

The constitution of the United States, amendment 9: the enumeration in the constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. "WHERE the language is plain and admits of no more than one meaning the duty of interpretation does not arise and the rules which are to aid doubtful meanings need no discussion" 66 Caminetti v. United States (1917)

Federal appeals case 94-1943 establishes the constitutional request for a 1^st amendment, Redress of Grievances/ expressing the need for court reform and the acceptance by the court of, WE THE PEOPLE/ NOT the treason of an evasion of issues, rights, & realities by LYING, and depending upon completely FALSE citations of record, without substance to this case. The court turns to "A traitorous act"!

THE BILL OF RIGHTS section 4. That NO man or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public

services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the office of magistrate, legislator, or judge to be hereditary. THIS examines both the reality of fundamental duties of the court and also its traitorous conduct of allowing judges the "descendible" office of an authority whose BAD behavior threatens society.

The establishment of case 92-s-1561 Asks the court to intervene in an equity case, whereby I am charged for services which were completely UNACCEPTABLE! The court refuses to hear, a simple equity case, as I am suing for the amount in dispute which the corporation HAS demanded through a collection company. In amended case 1561, the court is asked to provide the peer review of this matter by independent sources to determine the facts and decide, by THE LAW provided under social security sec 115 [42 U.S.C. 1320c-4] . The courts position: it doesn't matter if they earned the money, the property involved is a dispute over medical treatment/ therefore the court is uninterested. The social security law is completely uninteresting to the court, between audio tapes, the judge laughs and tells the defense attorney "she doesn't have a clue about the social security law referred to"/ I explain it, and laughter turns to instant hatred, due to the influence of a single word the medical community uses it judge me. A TRUE INJURY incurred because of the medical community, and supported by the court. The summation is "the court fundamentally asserts a mal-practice case, wherein the plaintiff asserts equity & property ARE AT STAKE: and the decision necessary is DO I OWE/ IF the court had obeyed its constitutional doctrine and duty, to understand prior to judgment/ this case would have ended here, but the prejudice applied by the medical community, and the complete disrespect aligned with me for not being a lawyer, prohibited an honest hearing. The judge gave opportunity/ but no ears to hear.

Social security 1155 Right to hearing & judicial review ...."ANY beneficiary, Who is entitled. To benefits under title XVII......shall be entitled to a reconsideration of such determination by the reviewing organization...... The court fails the law.

Constitution of the state of Illinois, section 6. SEARCHES, SEIZURES, PRIVACY AND INTERCEPTIONS The people shall have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and other possessions against unreasonable searches, seizures, invasions of privacy or interceptions of communications........ The question was I secured in the law, or cast adrift in the maze of exclusive and separate interests, given and protected to and for the medical industry/, NOT allowed by the constitutional documents?

Section 20 INDIVIDUAL DIGNITY to promote individual dignity, communications that portray criminality, depravity, or lack of virtue in, or that incite violence, hatred, abuse or hostility toward a person or group of persons by reason of or by reference to religious, racial, ethnic, national or regional affiliation are condemned. There is NO dignity in medical terminology.

Case 92-c-1222 exists to consider the question of monopoly, the concept of price fixing, the relationship of the individual to the medical community, and the medical emergency as it relates to constitutional aspects and our responsibilities as a nation to each other. The court finds NO law to sustain or deny. Neither does the plaintiff or the defendant for this particular moment in time. The judge in an unusual allowance, provides the plaintiff opportunity to talk.

That has since changed to the constitution of Illinois section 12 RIGHT TO REMEDY AND JUSTICE: every person shall find a certain remedy in the laws for all injuries and wrongs which he receives to his person, privacy, property, or reputation. He shall obtain justice by law, freely, completely, and promptly.

State appeals 93-0847 is used to enlarge the concept of forced change within the medical industry, as an entity NOT as a single corporation. It tells the court "we are in need", AND it asserts a constitutional foundation exists to confront that need and resolve it, through the peaceful democratic actions of discussion and then resolution of the problems as provided. This case further asserts that "hostage" is the proper relationship to be viewed as the patient in crisis is not their by freewill design or desire. Therefore a proper protection by the government is sustainable. This case then further opens the door to greater constitutional questions and challenges the court for having no authority or opportunity to be involved in an equity case. The court dismisses, for "does not comply with form & content of brief rules 341-344! The court FAILS in its DUTY! Further the court fails to support and defend the constitution as it demands from the official the obligation ....."in order to form a more perfect union....." This assertion demonstrates a "living nation", intent upon honesty and honor through respect defined by truth/ the court is UNINTERESTED!

Constitution of the state of Illinois section 23 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES a frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of civil government is necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty. These blessings cannot endure unless the people recognize their corresponding individual obligations and responsibilities.

State supreme 76450 chastises the court for its lack of ethics and assembles the question to define constitutional merit, and serve the community according to primary jurisdiction/ meaning constitution first! The court issues "DENIED"! Failure is now imminent, therefore the search for justice becomes an enlargement of the issues, in direct challenge of the federal court, and applies the "theory of evidence collection" as the method most likely to succeed.

Constitution of the state of Illinois PREAMBLE We, the people of the state of Illinois- grateful to almighty GOD for the civil, political and religious liberty which HE has permitted us to enjoy and seeking HIS blessing upon our endeavors- in order to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the people; maintain a representative and orderly government; eliminate poverty and inequality; assure legal, social and economic justice; provide opportunity for the fullest development of the individual; insure domestic tranquility; provide for the common defense; and secure the blessings of freedom and liberty to ourselves and our posterity- do ordain and establish this constitution for the state of Illinois.

Federal case 94-2060 begins the 1^st amendment legal redress of grievances, asserting collusion between the government and the medical industry against the citizen, and demands the preference given and the intimate association between medicine and the court STOP. The court orders: .....does not conform to rule 8 (a) requires short & plain statement.......a frivolous complaint....unable to articulate a colorable claim for relief.....DISMISSED

Amendment 10 of the US constitution declares the powers not delegated to the united states by the constitution nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively OR TO THE PEOPLE.

Federal appeals 94-1944 the concept of a 1^st amendment redress is refined to establish a broad basis for such actions, and then combined with 94-1943 to challenge the court for supremacy of the nation: CHOOSE: Do, We the People , RULE this nation or does the court fail, and transgress into tyranny. The court chooses to LIE AND CHEAT and STEAL our constitutional right for a redress of grievances under the 1^st amendment. JUDICIAL CANON 20 INFLUENCE OF DECISIONS UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW A judge.....that ours is a government of law and not of men, and that he violates his duty as a minister of justice under such a system if he seeks to do what he may personally consider substantial justice in a particular case and disregards the general law as he knows it to be binding upon him. Such action may become a precedent unsettling accepted principles and may have detrimental consequences beyond the immediate controversy. He should administer his office with a due regard to the integrity of the system of the law itself, remembering that he is not a depositary of arbitrary power, but a judge under the sanction of law. This failure designs the battleground to come, rather than give up power and pride/ these people who masquerade as judges, are in fact; simply thieves intent upon hiding their own actions to facilitate a greater theft. Whether they agree or not is irrelevant/ the constitution decides, and to blockade, is theft.

AMENDMENT 1 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

United States Supreme court is advised of treason & judicial depravity. The clerk orders an alternative avenue of approach. The plaintiff refuses/ TREASON goes unpunished. It is FAIR, to assume the basis and fundamental reality of the lower courts exists in direct relation to the supreme court/ therefore no attempt was made to comply. RATHER, the charge of treason carries NO time limit, and the necessity of public participation is certain/ an alternate time was chosen, and that time is now. The purpose being to fundamentally explore our relationship with government, and determine who does indeed rule this country.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES: WE the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.

The transcripts called city court indicate the corruption of power, available to social institutions and damage done. The fundamental relationships of the government to the citizen, examines the needs, and determines the consequence of a failure. Applied to the court, because the court commonly views these matters with more interest and favor to the city than to the individual/ and because complex issues of governmental control can lead to bankruptcy for the citizen, prior to their conclusion which is a fundamental collapse of the purpose of the court. The court fails, even though it was never contacted/ because the outcome, did not sustain the certainty of justice. The court must be fluid enough, and concerned enough to view governmental corruption with an immediate response.

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their CREATOR with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that, it is the right of the people to alter.......laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.......

Case 01-LM-16 IS a case unto itself, NOTHING, but the expansion of basic judicial jurisdiction, is added/ then the opportunity for the judge to abandon his duty, and hide from his responsibility is given. [The documents were added "the discussion of life/ as files (some may be missing a couple are added)" and the supreme court case listed herein, were added "to the file"/ this is used, to participate in a conclusion, that a decision will be made, regarding these words" by producing the demand to assign significance, and choose] . the judge as will whosoever else reads them concludes "out of my court"!, HE DOES, in the words of the court (be it noted, in the words of the court, "notice of hearing; ....at which time you may be present and heard if you desire", a form letter of sorts), present an option! Consequently the court FAILS COMPLETELY, (did they order me to court). It is not the right of a judge to hide or discard his social and legal responsibility/ it is NOT my job to be polite or "sensitive to his needs", HE FAILS by his own design and purposes, even though I do provide the incentive ; by committing my presence to the words and testimony I have provided and revised according to judicial request, I DID INDEED attend the motion hearing/ and was thrown out of court/ in direct DENIAL of my 7^th amendment right to trial, without cause! A motion hearing is not a trial!

JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND ETHICS 2.04. TOWARD LITIGANTS .....we take this opportunity to remind ourselves as judges that TYRANNY is nothing more than ill-used power.... Stating that a judge, "must lean over backward and err on the side of making sure that he does not intimidate the parties from pursuing legitimate claims.

Appeal for 01- lm-16 designs and distributes the consequences of judicial failures as a BLIGHT & DISEASE upon society. It is intended to identify and solidify the BASIC NEED of society as a responsibility of the court, and it DEMANDS the courage of a judge, because courage is needed. The appellate court replies (without producing a docket number), "what do you want"? When it could not be more clear "I WANTED JUSTICE"! The court FAILS COMPLETELY, AGAIN!

The constitution of the state of Illinois section 17, 18, 19 " NO DISCRIMINATION "!

NOW, comes the case presented: This is a writ of Mandamus/ meaning that I DO represent "WE THE PEOPLE" in our relationship to the court, and its relationship to the first amendment redress of grievances! And I DO demand and command the court to DO ITS DUTY, to establish the redress of grievances, before the people and HONOR the constitution, the constitutional DUTY, the authority of the PEOPLE OVER THIS GOVERNMENT, and the decisions to be made herein. By conforming to all constitutional documents and presenting the numerous LIFE, DEATH, AND IMPORTANT REALITIES listed herein, and causing appropriate discussion and thereby PUBLIC VOTE upon all matters of a constitutional and personal, and public concern herein.

The critical reality of all these cases creates a legal duty to investigate "the GAMES, judges do play" and to create the means to insure JUSTICE, SHALL NEVER AGAIN, BE A GAME. As indicated in the scanned judicial files, the US senate, nor the house, has an interest/ the judicial inquiry board of IL has no powers, and the house, senate, governors office, nor the attorney generals office of IL has NO interest in the case 01-LM016. Therefore the consequence of this trial, is a duty, as each set of representatives associated with the oversight of the judiciary SIMPLY CANNOT OR WILL NOT be involved, an act of cowardice. The court is advised, IT IS THE EVIDENCE OF JUSTICE, and not the assumption of justice that is on trial/ RULES ARE NOT JUSTICE, they are merely procedures intended to organize the process, not control it. The authority to be used is simply: IF A JURY COULD HAVE UNDERSTOOD, THEN THE COURT MUST ALSO!

I am here about change! NOT money, NOT power, NOT fame, or anything else that money or power can buy, RATHER A BETTER, SURVIVABLE, & HAPPY SOCIETY wherein the blessings are mine as well. To that end, rest assured, there shall NEVER BE, "any closed door discussions or deals"/ the truth says: by the measure you give, the measure you receive will be measured out against you. By the consequence, of "the American way"/ I do intend to bring this issue before the people, by one method or the other/ if I must buy; I will suggest to you: the knowledge necessary, to attain attention for this matter, is held by me and will be used as discretion allows or requires it to be.

I owe one man a TV interview/ I owe one man a RADIO interview, on my terms, and at my discretion these may have their interview, NO other interview will be granted. YOU DO have plenty to talk about without me! This material is intended for public and world consumption/ because the consequences are occurring with or without intervention. Truth alone, can and will create a change from the inevitable destructions and death that will occur without intervention/ some will refuse, based upon "it will cost them money or power: just like the judges above". BUT, just so you know REALITY WILL COME, and that reality contains NO mercy at all! Change or do not change, the choice is yours: my eternity is already set/ it shall not change, no matter what the world chooses. Therefore everything to be gained, is for you/ and you must make that decision, or suffer the consequence.