1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PETITION

THE GOVERNMENT

FOR A LEGAL REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.

The argument arises: WHO, HAS THE RIGHT to ask/why and where?

The first Amendment is quite clear: Congress shall make NO LAW.......prohibiting....or abridging the freedom of ......or the Right of......a redress of grievances.

The first Amendment is again quite clear: In whose freedom....."the people".....and who/what is restricted/required....."the government".

The third Article of the Constitution, is quite clear about legal issues/responsibilities: "section 1, The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme court, and in such inferior courts....established". and section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, and the laws of the United States..."

This petition draws from the initiating cases 94-2001 & 94-2060 to establish: THESE LEGAL GRIEVANCES!

let the facts be submitted:

The court IS NOT IMMUNE, it is established to PRODUCE, adequate or better behavior within Society, it is NOT separate, or entitled to exclusive privileges, BUT an example of a higher ideal! The court fails in these cases.

The court IS NOT CAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE, IF it cannot understand, complaints as arise from, "the common public citizen", in simple language! The court fails in these cases.

The court IS NOT in compliance with Constitutional doctrine as defined by: WE THE PEOPLE......"IF the people cannot establish their authority by a legal redress of grievances"........IN ORDER TO FORM A MORE PERFECT UNION....."IF the fundamental values supplied by the Bill of Rights, FAIL to instruct"........ESTABLISH JUSTICE......."IF the formality of court proceedings demonstrates, a complete disregard for the outcome or allows EASY ABUSE of the citizenry"....INSURE DOMESTIC TRANQUILLITY........"IF the court fails to uphold JUSTICE (the intent of the Law, as directed through the Bill of Rights)..........PROVIDE FOR THE COMMON DEFENSE........"IF the people are forced to PURCHASE justice"...........PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE.........."IF the Law can become entangled (millions of words are TOO MANY)......AND SECURE THE BLESSINGS OF LIBERTY TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY,........."IF liberty FAILS the people, allowing one group supremacy over the majority, allows pillaging of resources, allows the betrayal of the public trust in its most basic social foundation, allows inherent and inalienable rights to be possessions stolen."

Are these the things ordained and established by the American Constitution? WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?

The civil Authority CANNOT be demonstrated upon a single complaint. The public issues arise in connection with VALID, REASONABLE, social disputes. The authority called civil power BEGINS:

When the people join.

when the people discuss relevant expectations.

when the people Watch/Listen and react.

when the people define their decision.

when the people explain how far the boundary extends.

when the people specify, the penalty.

AND IS COMPLETE

when the people enforce their decision through law; CLEARLY visible and understandable to the majority.

Throughout the legal cases represented by Federal case 94-2001 & 94-2060 EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT, to communicate the Realities involved, has been made; yet the Court says, "I DON'T UNDERSTAND"!