The Societal Journey into a legal redress of Grievances begins:

It is a FACT, that each Societal Economy is based upon only 2 factors: The first is, "I" have the RIGHT of access to such Resources as can be recognized; the second, "I" have the RIGHT of access, to the methods and processes and thoughts necessary to utilize those resources to the best of my ability.

Capitalism has proven the best , at distributing these facts to the majority; "Times however have changed. The Realities of, Resource depletion, Pollution, and over population, DO now suggest Capitalism SHOULD BE slightly altered! As a scarcity of all things, begins to become apparent; SOCIETY can no longer afford unrestrained GREED. Capitalism must therefore be RESTRICTED as to: Maximum income per year (irregardless of any other factor) of any/every individual. That amount could be, no more than the president of the United States. The result of this restriction is expected to be: MORE FOR THE REST,.............................!

Money is man kinds description of time & energy & expertise. Our time is EQUAL (person to person) for each work, IT IS OUR LIVES! Our Energy DOES NOT equal or exceed two or three other average workers! Our Expertise is largely inherited and therefore can be counted, only within the context of time and energy!

The Restriction applied to maximum income per year, per individual, to be voted upon and chosen by the majority, DOES NOT represent a Constitutional prohibition RATHER Amendment 9 says it best: The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained BY THE PEOPLE: and enjoins the Constitutional Mandates: in order to form a more perfect union, establish Justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity!

MEMORANDUM as necessary for this presentment

Humanity SEEKS FREEDOM, measuring Individual Freedom through its Societies, each looking to achieve and accumulate before other men/women, and nations. This process Redefines Freedom as Liberty for some, "Slavery" for others (the working poor).

Freedom achieved, grants every citizen a true opportunity to establish Society within their own authority (one person /.one vote). THEREFORE, when government officials create a public danger. The possibility of forcing more and more people into economic slavery, due to a wide variety of factors; for example, the national debt, improper banking policies that led to S & L bailouts, the medical monopoly, ETC.

It therefore becomes OUR RIGHT to inquire of the Constitutional Basis of this presentment, PRIOR to public evaluation.

The Legal means to obtain and enforce a, REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, "from the government", BECOMES the peoples Authority, altering or abolishing those things as NECESSARY, to substantiate and/ or delineate Freedom and Equality, within Constitutional limits, for us all!

Returning to the issue being presented: This concept of shared responsibility needs NO explanation, among the majority, (WAR, has established this).

The concept of shared Economic responsibility, through fundamental Democracy, WITHOUT altering capitalism, in any manner, Establishes people before, "truly excessive" greed.

The agreement begins, "the rich provide jobs", reality recognized is, "the rich/ powerful pay as little as possible and share virtually nothing". This agreement of jobs, WILL BE MITIGATED, through a program of, "teach and support other people in the nation/ community," and the people will allow an increase in your salary, beyond the established limit; according to the value of your work, for others and therefore the Nation.

The QUESTION TO THE COURT: for the purpose of this presentment, DOES THE DEMAND FOR EQUALITY, within Constitutional documents, and supported by the fight for Equality designated as the Civil War, (Slavery was the focal point, But Equality, described the Right, the Wrong, and the WHY) apply ? DO these , Establish the Words of the Declaration of Independence: ......."We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men (women) are created EQUAL; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"...........

The Spirit (the purpose chosen above selfishness, or fears, or righteousness) of these words is clearly to live as each would choose, within the boundaries of honest work equals honest pay, honorable treatment of others establishes honorable treatment for you, and WE WILL fight together, WHEN WE MUST!

Our Destiny as a Nation IS INTENDED TO BE: (Declaration of Independence).........."and of right ought to be, free and independent............and for the support of this declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, WE mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor!

Do these words then, assemble and Enable the people, as a majority, to chart their own destiny: VOTE UPON THE ISSUES (as desired) THEMSELVES; within Constitutional limits, A VETO POWER, called Democratic Authority!

The question then established is: WHO, controls the destiny of this Nation?

It is my RIGHT to inquire of the Constitutional Basis of this presentment PRIOR to public evaluation. It is in this manner that the words associated with:

DeJonge V. Oregon 299 U.S. 353, 57 S. CT. 255, 81 L. ED. 278 (1937) ........"to the end that government may be responsive to the will of the people and that changes, if desired, may be obtained by peaceful means. Therein lies the SECURITY of the Republic, the VERY FOUNDATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT"...... ! This right is therefore for the purpose of securing, TRUE DEMOCRACY, through the first Amendment, Redress of Grievances!

RE: 94-2001

This case begins in the lower courts strictly in the language of the common citizen, A SIMPLE CASE. As requested by the Court it was "redressed" in a legal format, BASED UPON: A civil Rights action!

Evidence and personal testimony was given, and established through the Record, which was filed with the pleadings, and the memorandum in support. (cause of grievance), and further identified by (the common citizens outcry for Justice), a simple explanation included in the writ of right, Jan 28,1994.

The evidence was submitted within a CLEAR and CONCISE investigative procedure, whereupon the extent of abuse, and thereby damage could be easily ascertained; again as implied and supported by the record, received jan 6,1994 (applied to the test)!

The plaintiff illustrates his Right through Constitutional doctrine (authority)

YET THE COURT SAYS; "the plaintiffs response does not satisfy the courts requirements, specifically Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (a). Rule 8 (a) requires a "short and plain" statement of the grounds upon which jurisdiction exists, a short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgement for the relief the pleader seeks. Feb 08,1994.

The plaintiff replies Feb 18,1994, with a Constitutional Basis, per pleading, Being SHORT, and PLAIN, and SPECIFIC.

The Court replies: "Frivolous"

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 26, 1994

By the Court:

JAMES F. OSTERBUR, ] Appeal from the United

Plaintiff-Appellant, ] States District Court for

] the Central District of

No. 94-1943 v. ] Illinois, Danville

] Division.

STATE OF ILLINOIS, ]

Defendant-Appellee. ] No. 94 C 2001

]

] Harold A. Baker,

] Judge.

]

Upon consideration of the REBUTTAL OF MOTION FOR ORDER OF NONINVOLVEMENT, DATED MAY 17, 1994 filed 5/25/94 by the pro se appellant, which the court construes as a motion to reconsider the order of 5/20/94,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reconsider is DENIED.

Buíteb states Court of Appeal!

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago Illinois 60604

CIRCUIT RULE 3(b) NOTICE