MOTION FOR TURNOVER OF EVIDENCE

FILED APR 26,1993

92-S-2991

I believe the motor and transmission were tampered with. I clearly said so during trial. I told the plaintiff and her boyfriend, I would soon be picking up the car and asked her where it was located (IMMEDIATELY) after the trial. She told me it was located where she lived and made NO indication it would be a problem. I went to a chemical engineer, Ed Perkins, at the U of I, and arranged for testing of oil residues on april 30,1993, his earliest day available. And arranged for other services to pick up the car for me. On april 23, 1993 friday the boyfriend call and wants the money, and is going to haul the car away.

I plainly tell him I will pay at the last legal day possible, 30 days from the date, barring continuances and I will be picking up the car on april 30, 1993. And clearly told him NO CAR, NO MONEY! I NOW OWN THAT CAR, He complains says NO.

James F. Osterbur

A MOTION TO STAY JUDGEMENT

OCT 13, 1993

92-S-2991

A review: (1) case 92-s-2991 has NOT BEEN SETTLED within the court

2. Case 92-s-2991 has become state of ill supreme court case 76128 and is awaiting those proceedings.

3. The requirement to pay PRIOR to all current and necessary court proceeding IS a liability of/for the court system, or the presiding judge.

4. The presiding judge, by avoiding the requirement for awaiting trial to be over, and requiring payment made Prior to the supreme court case 76128, HAS INSURED PERSONALLY the debt, that shall be owed to the defendant should he win case 76128 with interest and penalty!

James F. Osterbur