Definitions which participate in this testimony which describe Areligious concerns@ are not subject to questioning within the court/ INSTEAD these warnings exist only to establish the completion of all discussion and or requirements to forewarn Selimi in case the need arises/ no further words are necessary!

The question of a threat is considered minimal, I believe Selimi was just playing another game (gambling)/ NO conclusive proof exists however, that it is merely Aa stupid game@, therefore it will be treated as a legitimate threat until proven otherwise. I will remind the court, the threat did not come from Selimi himself directly to me, but as a warning with undeniable meaning from another as described. To the court, this person shall not make a good witness because Afear, panic, and depression@ are all involved, the consequence of being called into court shall be SIGNIFICANT to this person. Therefore request is made as to the abilities of the court to limit the severity of fear (WHAT can you provide). There are many reasons for fear, and I do not present this as simply fear of Selimi, rather immigrants Astick together or are abandoned, by each other@, I do not know it is not fear of Selimi either. Again the acceptance of the possibility of a threat exists from the interactions, I experienced as described in these testimonial papers.

Warning is given to Selimi: NOTHING that is not brought up in the initiating trial can be appealed, therefore we will be discussing details. Second only an adequate audience can insure an adequate trial, therefore an audience will begin to be prepared. Third nothing which occurs through the court can ever be dismissed or changed, by you or me! It is presented and it will remain as is. I DO SAY, to you Selimi, that I am not your prosecutor/ I did nothing to you, these are your actions/ the fact that I refuse to provide any Apower@ over others to you, by leaving what is clearly mine, as money in your hands is certainly nothing less than you would do. The consequences of your own actions, are and were simply described and created ONLY BY YOU!

1. If you can read American, then you have no defense, for misunderstanding this contract. The fact that you had several lawyers, are a businessman, had at your request several other businessmen to consult, held the contract in your possession for a week, and did say no when asked if there is anything you wish to discuss about the contract before signing, DOES mean ample opportunity to understand was provided, and any misconceptions are STRICTLY your own fault. THEREFORE, a financial action to recover the money owed as described in pleadings, for the various work that could be considered and was extras, according to the contract, as described, is requested from the court/ I HAVE waited long enough!

2 The question of power is evident/ power means the contract was breached not only financially but by the evidence of fraud! A contract written which clearly and deliberately identifies the contractor Osterbur/ had provided with intent every necessary legal action to the owner Selimi to provide a resolution of any dispute to favor Selimi; thereby making even the concept of a problem with regard to the business of the remodeling a simple question of do you want me to continue? The fact that Selimi did not use this legal maneuver, but chose deception, trickery, and harm instead substantially proves: the contract was entered by Selimi under false pretenses. Otherwise if a problem in the work presented, the resolution of that problem gave Selimi more than adequate means for a legal relief. The price of fraud shall be $10,000.00.

2. My entrance into and the signing of this contract was about providing stability to my nephew, a FACT which Selimi was COMPLETELY AND CLEARLY AWARE! Evidence exists of this by my testimony, by the descriptions evident in the pleadings as have been presented, by the VERY minimal price of the contract (less than half of a normal bid), and the fact that money was returned from the time & material phase of the job. Power is evident, as this too was a MORE THAN fair price for the work done! Money was returned ONLY because it was now January and construction work is hard to come by in winter months. I was promised this job, assuming I could and did underbid any other contractor/ this DID occur! When it was clear Selimi was lying about Ahe wanted me to make money here too@/ the price was lowered to an unrealistic level simply to provide the necessary stability to my nephew. He had been in a drug rehab program less than a year ago, where the bills can escalate very rapidly, and it was cheaper to work than to pay. Selimi KNEW these things prior to signing the contract, prior to beginning the work. Therefore when he deliberately made his decision to subvert and begin a destruction of the integrity of the contract and the agreements prior to the contract as well as, agreements made after the contract (regarding payments to be made, as described), ended in my suggesting to my nephew that he may need to find another job after we were through here/ without the money the next job was in jeopardy. My nephew experienced a level of anxiety so intense, that although no problem of any kind had been experienced in the past year or so/ that within 30 days, he had been arrested 3 times for drunk driving/ lost his license/ spent 30 days in jail/ and incurred lawyer fees and an arrest record he will keep for the rest of his life. THIS IS AN INJURY, completely avoidable, and evidence exists in the fact that after I told him not to worry anymore, no further problem existed nor has he experienced any further problems to this day. The purpose of the contract was stability for my nephew/ this contract was breached in full the day that stability was in doubt, and the subsequent damage to a life, is and will be subjected to the issues of negligence wherein, due to the actions of Selimi, another life was harmed. The price of negligence is $30,000.00.

Reliance begins within IL commercial law 461 contracts / 285 contracts/ performance or breach 1:41 / 1:39 / & 5:33 as it governs the contract, the intent of the contract, and the purpose of the contract. Reliance in law as it regards negligence will be presented at a later time, prior to court.

3. Selimi came to me in the 3^rd or 4^th week of the contract period with money concerns, fearing he could lose everything! I listened, and chose as a result to increase my own work schedule to 7 days a week @ 12 to 14 hours a day/ this was my choice and I made it willingly, and it resulted in too much strain for my body and the problems associated with a heart-attack years earlier came back, do to the increased work schedule. It is my statement, that my health was good prior to this decision and sufficient hard work exists for the previous months prior to this job to support this as fact. More help could not be realistically hired because the plumber, Ahired by Selimi, kept by Selimi even though specific requests were made to get rid of him@, would NOT complete his work. Numerous efforts and phone calls were made in this matter, and the work cannot be completed until the plumber gets OUT OF THE WAY. The problem is well illustrated in the fact, I finally had to tell his phone operator Aeither he gets here to complete this tomorrow OR I will drywall the bathroom pipes or no pipes@ he came, and then disappeared again/ his men said ANO they were not busy@, no excuse. It is the reality of fraud and the intent of harm and the damage created, from which I have still not fully recovered, that brings this aspect of the pleadings. If the specific intent of disrespect, the actual decision to harm, and the damage done to my nephew did not exist, THEN the medical problem would be mine and no mention made. INSTEAD this is another irritation, specifically incurred, because of actions and decisions made by Selimi that resulted in damage to my life, and as a consequence falls within the category and concepts of the IL statues on theft & related offenses. IL criminal law 70;04 prima facie evidence; intent. In as much as Selimi knowingly took control over the contract by deception/ knowingly represented himself in such a manner as to illicit a specific work effort from the contractor, failed to uphold without good cause his agreement and as a consequence DID steal something of value from the contractor, a portion of his health. The price associated with this matter is $40,000.00. Hospital records will be provided at a later time.

The definition of a property is properly & correctly identified, as a fact developed within the HONEST belief in GOD ! The body is my possession/ my property upon this earth, but NOT my life. Therefore the development of theft, as a consequence of a deliberate decision, and a distinct action, when coupled to the reality of a deliberate, willful, planned & executed attack by Selimi upon me, at the end of the work: Produces an additional definition of violent intent ( the desire and subsequent action, to harm). Demonstrates the consequence of harm; to this body, was definable to specific decisions which Selimi made.

4. The social implications of behaviors clearly in absence of honorable intentions. Behaviors clearly described which are a detriment to this society. Behaviors which if allowed to multiply, because all bad behaviors produce a similar behavior or substantiate a reason for other people to consider revenge upon society, in general. DOES defend the United States Code 8 USCS 1227 (1999) section B. an alien in violation of the law is deportable. His family is not involved, therefore not deportable.
5. Arrogance brings this matter to its current situation or to trial. Selimi is offered to buy his way out of this action ONLY because it is unclear if his actions were based upon his fears, making him simply stupid, or if he has died inside?