A review is made necessary due to the failure of Mr. Selimi to keep his word. It is noted for court purposes mr. selimi clearly and deliberately stated to me on several occasions (BEFORE I signed) the proposal in question: His words were; AI want you to make money here, at this job@! Noted he was quite firm and did his best to convince me he meant what he said. I regard this as an oral/ verbal contract/ and mr selimi verified it was true in front of his partner Isen, & me, while we discussed the problem of a contract amount which failed to meet expenditures. This was during the last week of February / this is the last week of march. At that meeting mr selimi said He WOULD do his very best to see I got paid for all expenses and MORE.

Mr. selimi and I talked again this date of march 30 (the work being over). Mr selimi now states maybe he will pay a little of the expenditure in time if he chooses to do so. BUT, if I don=t accept this new offer He will refuse to pay anything. Reality is mr selimi is in money trouble and clearly I am to be abandoned. For clarity the money in question is strictly out of pocket expense, as I have NOT made one single dime in labor or other, for myself in over 4 months of work. I have said to selimi AI don=t@ care about the work just pay the expenses, and we will be Afriends@. Mr selimi choose instead to BREAK his promise that I would make money here/ to BREAK his promise in front of Isen and me, to do his BEST and pay not only the expenses but also a reasonable wage for the job done. It is my testimony without selimi=s verbal guarantee that I would make money at this job/ the proposal in question would NOT have been entered into. Of interest I bid (a portion of this job) with 2 other contractors each bidding on the same and I was $2000 under one & even with the other. Mr. selimi complained for fifteen minutes about he=s not saving any money and because immediately before reviewing the bids selimi got 6 inches from my face when he told me for a 3^rd time, I WANT YOU to make money here.

Believing him to be honest I accepted his GUARANTEE and simply threw in the rest of the work, believing a FAIR agreement could be reached at the end of the job. I can be understood: if the owner wants you to make money, you will! This is the basis of our oral agreement: the owner says you WILL make money/ and I accept this as a contractual guarantee! The question is then WHY did selimi make this statement? The answer can only go, Aone way or the other@; either it was a guarantee or it was an attempt to gain a trust for dishonest purposes.

Be it known, I have finished my work, before all other contractors. During the contractual period selimi had 2 jobs; to take care of the money & to pay within 3 days of notification of a payment demand in the amount given. Selimi DID NOT do his job in either matter. The first problem occurred during the 2^nd week in February. Selimi was clearly & deliberately told a payment of $10000 was due and he failed to pay within a weeks period. The next time a $10,000 payment selimi again paid after the deadline and an amount one-half of the billed amount. He then said, Athe banker won=t let me give you any more than this@. I called the banker Mr. Dillion and inquired, he said, ANOT ME, it was selimi who refused to authorize.@ This is now the 3^rd time the contract was broken, and a letter was given to clarify how the money was used. Noted: under terms and conditions of this proposal Afailure to pay or failure to pay within 3 days, results in the contract ending! NO contract exists beyond this time. Selimi HAS read the contract & employs an attorney. Every billing except for the very last $2000 bill for extra=s was handled in exactly the same way. Irregardless of the contract being broken, I continued to work STILL believing selimi would honor his promise.

With regard to ceramic work Aowner supplied tile and grout for kitchen & cooler.

The concept that restroom stalls Ais an accessory@ is mute as code demands them therefore whatever code demand cannot be an accessory.

The installation of, as clearly begins the description of the work DOES NOT include purchase of ceiling tile or grid or paint. IF that was meant or agreed to the wording would be the same as : Aall carpentry & payments.....@.

Area=s painted by others were at selimi discretion and are NOT subject to an adjustment.

Work done to the new cooler including footings & floor set upon the old Aparking lot@ were NOT/ are not guaranteed, therefore ANY problem that occurs is not mine. Selimi insisted the blacktop surface was not to be excavated nor footings dug, therefore it is his own problem, should any occur.

Likewise the inner entrance doors were removed, stored, and walls, flooring, & ceiling replaced/ these are extra=s.

BE ADVISED, AI am no longer, interested in breaking even@. Failure to be fair, as it applies to 4 and one half months of work ; 6 days a week @ 8-10 hours or more per day including 3 weeks of constant 12-14 hour days @ 7 days a week DO APPLY.