FILED FEB 18, 1994
RE: 94-2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
A CLASS ACTION SUIT
PLAINTIFF: " THE COMMON PUBLIC CITIZEN"
being represented by; JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR
V.
DEFENDANT: STATE OF ILLINOIS
being represented by; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
for the state ROLAND BURRIS, or as appointed
RE: 94-2001
Pursuant to order, filed feb 08, 1994
REPLIED: The Plaintiff submits, this federal action judiciously SEEKS CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEED, RIGHTS FOR THE COMMON PUBLIC CITIZEN, as decreed.
The only personal conflict involved is set aside within, "the inquiry", as stated, and is NOT a part of the pleadings.
Be it noted the plaintiff submits, "so-called", as used LACKS RESPECT, and is in direct contention with the words: "the plaintiff appears more than capable of presenting his case; additionally, the court grants pro se litigants wide latitude in the handling of their lawsuits, pg 4, (this order).
An examination of the writ of RIGHT reveals the facts as:
PLEADINGS AS DESCRIBED;
1. DUE PROCESS DENIED, Failure to provide constitutional right.
DEMAND: Sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
2. CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, Failure to be impartial.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
3. LIBEL, as applied to constitutional jurisprudence, a parody of justice.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
4. DUE PROCESS, Failure to provide EQUAL protection under the law.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
5. CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, Failure to uphold, Oath of office, lack or respect, a question.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
6. a CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL QUESTION, Democratic freedom, right to initiate and expect an appropriate response.
DEMAND; Answer the question, sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
7. CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, an illegal usage of power.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
8. MOCK JUSTICE, Failure to provide for the common defense.
DEMAND; FIX IT, sustain our Rights.
9. A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION, Failure to provide protection through the court system.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
10. CONSTITUTIONAL FAIRNESS, Failure to rely on fundamental principles.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
11. JUDICIAL INFRINGEMENT OF RIGHTS, Failure to rely on fundamental principles.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights discipline or dismiss.
12. JUDICIAL IMPROPRIETY, a corruption of fundamental principles.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
13. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION DENIED, Failure to provide EQUAL protection under the law.
DEMAND; Establish JUSTICE, sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
14. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL OF JUSTICE, Failure to establish justice.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, establish justice, discipline or dismiss.
15. CHARGES OF CORRUPTION, as described; An establishment of "WE THE PEOPLE.....are in charge".
DEMAND; Constitutional privilege and Right, acknowledge and FIX IT CORRECTLY.
16. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO JUSTICE, Failure to rely on fundamental principles.
DEMAND; sustain our Rights, discipline or dismiss.
17. CONSTITUTIONAL UNIFORMITY, Failure to provide EQUAL PROTECTION under the LAW.
DEMAND; establish JUSTICE THROUGH EQUALITY, a constitutional decree.
18. DEMOCRATIC CHANGE (a legal demand), provide according to "changing times", when CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED, INITIATE through public affirmation.
DEMAND; a Constitutional Right as seen within the words/concept, "the court resembles a constitutional convention in continuous session".
The definition of "writ of RIGHT" reads: 1. a common law writ for restoring to its owner property, held by another. 2. a writ granted as a matter of right.
Each and every pleading as stated, fall under the single charge of CONSTITUTIONAL PIRACY!
giving rise the demand: "Return to us, the public citizen, EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW, AND dismiss or discipline those who have failed, and allow for $1,000,000.00 dollars for use within/from the state of illinois, as an, corruption of the court, clean up the mess expenditure.
THE DEFENDANT IS: STATE OF ILLINOIS (COURT SYSTEM)
subpoena issued to, ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
for the state, ROLAND BURRIS, or as appointed.
This is to be: A CLASS ACTION SUIT, and the time and legal assistance necessary from the court is expected and DEMANDED.
I, James F. Osterbur, shall appear for/with the public, who join in the many like cases involving, DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION, JUDICIAL TYRANNY, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DENIED, as are expected to join.