TO: The Champaign/ Urbana Sanitary district
FROM: James F. Osterbur
dated: 11/ 23 / 12
RE: the reality of dispute, as to whether you are legally entitled to bill this enterprise for the usage of your utility; entirely by a tenant. I say no.
However, this matter has now come to the moment of decision, and those who comprise the trust involved by ownership in these locations: by vote/ say "just let them have the money/ it ain't worth the trouble". They have a legal right.
As a consequence, I do demand that my personal name and liability regarding this matter; this billing now and in the future MUST be changed.
Therefore return to me a billing that establishes ________________________________
whose legal address is____________________________________________________________
and whose employer identification number is_________________________________________
removing my name from the previous; and addressing it entirely to the trust created by Frank R. Osterbur. And I will send you a check immediately, from their account/ ending this conflict. That is the decision of this trust/ whether good or bad.
I owe you NO LATE FEES OR PENALTIES, for demanding legal proof of billing/ it is a right, and it is your legal obligation to do so; your failure to obey the law is no excuse.
However if you refuse, the trust says: pay it anyway.
As to my personal demand to hold accountable all who simply intend to "steal the money"/ by making others pay, without a legal right. As is a pandemic throughout these failed states called America. It is shelved or dissolved; until another day, when the total collapse of America as we know it today is complete. However unlikely it is that America will or could be resurrected from the disaster of "university leadership"; and the civil war that will follow. The measure of threats that can exterminate us/ the reality of bankruptcy that has invaded us/ the consequence of debt that is now destroying the middle class and giving away america, one piece at a time; cannot be denied. You may find information on this at www.justtalking3.info
The intent of how this particular matter, would have gone: so as those who are still willing to proceed may do so; is provided: added to this mailing, and to those who have been mailed to in the past. For a simple purpose: To recognize that justice, and everything good about society is killed or murdered, or saved by justice: "one small tidbit at a time". Until the mountain as an impediment to justice/ or the reality created by justice has made the journey to life in this place "what we deserve, through equality and fair play/ or the disaster of fools".
In this simple issue to determine WHO OWES, for someone else's waste water; the attorney general's office states: "A local ordinance states that the property owner, not the tenant is responsible for paying the water and water treatment bills." So the question becomes: WHY, IS THE LANDLORD responsible for the actions of another. WHEN CLEARLY he or she or they have no direct control over what the tenant does. How do the cities involved demand I must pay for another, and their own decision; particularly when water can simply be run twenty four hours a day by a tenant; to create a tremendous bill, without the penalty "YOU, ARE responsible".
The discrimination is evident: in this simple fact. Someone who makes a deliberate decision for themselves, such as water usage/ CANNOT THEN hand the debt for that usage to someone else. The landlord here is being charged, for what the tenant does. Equal and fair treatment says: if you create the bill/ then you owe the bill. So long as the billing is fair.
The attorney general's office brings IL American water into the issue of billing. Which brings another dimension of illegal billing to the forefront: It is "suggested", that they collect money here, to pay for infrastructure repairs elsewhere. Their sales of water here, to ethanol producers have multiplied the cost of water. WHY ARE WE, subsidizing others: THEY ARE private enterprise, NOT government. That is discrimination against this area. And even if they were local government owned, they have no rights to charge us for infrastructure done elsewhere. Regardless this begins as a sanitary billing, not a water billing: so it has grown. And is set to demand: How do we know, what is being done with or to our water supply/ blind faith has proven to be a fool, or idiots decision. Where is the proof/ understanding, the future has needs too. Water seeks its own level, which means as a lower aquifer is drained, only one tiny hole separates every other aquifer in the area from being drained into the lower vessel. Lowered water in an aquifer such as the Mahomet causes that area to collapse, and become unusable for water storage ever again. So as they discharge water from one/ they can steal water from any or all the others: making areas NOT aligned with the city of Champaign or Urbana (Mahomet aquifer) dry. Can't live here anymore/ unless you pay. Many chemicals are one part per billion, and you ruined the water: what then do we need to know/ that is hidden from our sight? Here is an interesting statistic: if they say to you, "don't worry" these things are one thousand feet apart/ as they do in fracking. Measure that distance and it is less than ONE FIFTH OF ONE MILE in actual real distance: wave to each other/ talk. That is all that stands between the water you need to drink/ WILL WAR OVER; and its contamination. What would one earthquake do? What does one small hole in a pressure vessel do/ is it not coming to the surface? Where do they push the toxic waste, a separate issue? Because if they ruin the water somewhere else/ are not those people COMING HERE! How much water does a thousand gallons destroy, in a water supply for millions? The money don't care: THEY PLAN TO MOVE/ but where are you going to go. Answer the question! Learn or die. What you don't know, CAN kill you; is that not so. Are there no consequences/ indeed there are?
Failure exists, because of want: if you don't want "this"/ or don't want to hide this: then you don't lie. Because failure exists: the bribes, and the greed leaders have created: are proven that severe. Be it known, leadership has failed life, "in ten thousand different ways"/ all because, the only thing american leadership wants, "is the money/ the power to manipulate/ and the ability to control without being questioned". Failure is a proven lie/ the fool dies, trying to protect his or her want/ and the disease of power is a cancer that kills life; by destroying peace and harmony in society.
To: Urbana & Champaign Sanitary district
from: James F. Osterbur
2191 county road 2500 e
St. Joseph, IL 61873
dated: 12/19/12
property, Urbana
bill number 3853804
bill number3856254
RE: Your sewer billing and past due notice are subsequently harassment/ it is a distinct discrimination and a purpose without law to deny me; the foundation of your claim. Due to the fact these are user charges, and you have not established why I am legally bound to pay for someone else's usage of your service. I AM owed the legal documentation of why I am charged this billing; your assumptions are not sufficient/ the law rules, not you; or democracy has been usurped. YOU HAVE FAILED, the primary test of all contracts: the fact that both parties MUST be provided with the legal documentation that defines their agreement. That is a breach you have now established, and illegally supported with threat: the discontinuance of water service. Having failed to properly support your position against me, this is criminal harassment 437 F. Supp 201, 221: against a tenant that is completely unaware, and totally uninvolved, at this time. Apart from the fact she inhabits an apartment in question. That is an unnecessary hardship against her/ and is extortion, the intent to produce fear and coercion, used against me.
I ask for legal definition and documentation/ a legitimate legal question: I do not state that I won't pay the billing, in fact I shall once you have established it is in fact my billing. This is about the legal distinction required of all who establish a billing against someone else: the simple demand of why does the landlord, owe this bill? It is not more complex/ at least not in this day. Having made several requests, for this documentation, and refused. The criminal act is established: as the tenant is now being threaten, by the use of force or damage to a tenant: by taking water away that she has deliberately and without doubt paid for. That is larceny (she owns the right/ and you are required by law to provide it to her, as she has paid that bill). This is then a sneak attack, completely outside the realm of law; a purpose that cannot be supported by legal right. This is the threat against public health and legitimate property rights that can only be called organized crime. Your threat is strictly, for the purpose of taking money, from the landlord: rather than establishing the law, that rules. By using "an innocent bystander" to support your demand: "We are the law". You have declared democracy itself is irrelevant. Democracy is: WE THE PEOPLE RULE OURSELVES, BY THE LAW WE CREATE. YOU, have abandoned the law, and issued threats against the innocent; how is that DUE PROCESS owed to me? It is instead again recognized; what has now become an extortion, earns the title of organized crime 383 F. Supp 346, 350. Or more simply: those who threaten harm, or injury, by pretending to be the "all powerful authority, which CANNOT be subjected to law" will do anything they want. To an innocent party/ without the law/ by force: simply to make the landlord pay, without access to court, or the guarantees of the constitution itself; which is "the government".
This act of crime/ this refusal for due process, as guaranteed by the constitution; is no different than treason on a tiny level. Added up, throughout the disgrace that is "leadership through arrogance"/ as has taken over the entire nation; and democracy is dead. A vote has no purpose, unless it achieves its true desire/ that does not happen here, as every intended issue to vote upon; is filled with lies, temptations, failure, and fools.
Prove I have no legal rights, to the documentation that supports your demand: the law, or the rule that subjects me to a debt, for what is clearly someone else's usage. Or, prove that I cannot "like you"/ just say to the tenant", here, pay my personal electric bill/ I have more power here than you; the law is ridiculous and unworthy: YOU have no choice. How is that justice? It is the same!
I am owed, with good cause: the legal notification that was repeatedly requested 319P 2d 983, 986. The correct billing is: the tenant owes/ as it is her, or his water that falls down the pipe. Check your own user table as provided on this billing/ NOT a drop from usage is by, the landlord.
There is however a correction to be made in this matter; the initiating question of double billing/ no thanks to you. As I have talked to the tenant at the current property in question; and she states she is not billed for sanitary service/ subsequently a call to an alternate tenant suggests the issue of double billing is now dropped, as the evidence no longer supports that claim. What should have been "good information"/ is found lacking; therefore no further question regarding double billing is found.
So there can be no confusion: another apartment, at a different location; having recently been rented, to a new tenant/ after a two week period or so of being open for rent; THERE HAS been a problem with the tenant NOT transferring the water billing to her name. That problem is believed to be corrected now; and again it is her water usage, and NOT the landlord, who does not live on this property, and does NOT provide water to these tenants. If that tenant does not pay her bill/ then disconnect her from the water supply; AND TELL public health, so as to protect the property, and the public. That is your right and obligation under the law.
The minimal transfer usage applied to the landlord while an apartment is in transition/ "an average of two weeks or so". Can be billed to me, if your records are accurate/ however I remind you, that in fact this is a matter of public health more than a need; as invariably someone coming to look at the apartment will ask to use the bathroom before it is rented. Consequently it is more prudent to have the water transferred during this time. I submit further, in lieu of "substantial cost"/ THERE IS an infrastructure issue here: as the landlord provides and maintains, all plumbing associated with these utilities, both water and sewage! that you use to bill for services you provide. Or more simply, YOU ARE using my infrastructure without payment to me! That would be considered unfair in some legal avenues. You expect money for your infrastructures and maintenance; is that not the cause of your billing/ why not me? I don't use them, or in an extremely minimal way/ only YOU, and the tenants do. If we go to court, this will come up.
This is now the fourth notice I have sent to you, and to those who consent to let you harass me. Demanding LEGAL proof: that you have a right under state law, to bill me for usage by the tenants; is in question. Submit that proof, and I will pay you/ or see you in court; if that is your decision; as the case may be. If you shut off the tenants water: the "patent defect 83 S.E. 2d 26,29; of a crime against the law": demands a criminal consequence against anyone who orders that action. You are threatening to steal, something of value. You are threatening a property and public health simply because you refuse to let law decide that is notorious possession, a hostile act 108 S.W. 2d 489, 493. It is a crime. That crime includes: to use someone else/ to steal and disrupt their lives; just because you don't want the law to interfere with your own decision to make the landlord pay.
Refuse to substantiate your claim for payment based upon someone else's usage; and class action suit can follow. The return of money owed for failed or flawed policies in the past; can be supported; and the appropriate legal channels may open. Until you substantiate your claim for money owed/ by the legal rights involved in the contract between us: you have no claim. If there is a billing/ there is a contract. Therefore it cannot be past due, nor late fees or penalties applied without crossing the line called contempt for the law/ and more. This is your failure, it is not mine; had you complied and sent the necessary documentation: all legal rights, payments, and subsequent expectations, on both sides would have been met. You did not. The law requires you to substantiate your claim/ it is not a whim; I have a right. ITS CALLED DUE PROCESS! Prove this is not so!
YOUR only other options is: Either DO present the legal substance upon which you base your claim SO, this matter can be resolved as quickly as possible/ or leave me, and the property I manage "politely"alone.
Your choice does not include presenting an unnecessary hardship to any tenant based upon any cause they did not incur personally. The conclusive evidence is real: these tenants are not involved/ they merely live on the property in question. 21 So 2d 878, 880. YOUR OPTION includes taking me to court personally, as my name is on the billing in question/ but it does not include taking "Frank" to court; as he has died. "Frank, nor his concerns"; have NOT questioned you/ ONLY ME; James Frank Osterbur. I am the one requesting due process with regard to the legal rights involved. And I will not be going to court alone: as every landlord in this sanitary district has the right to question you/ and you have the obligation under law to advise them THEIR LEGAL RIGHT to join that action; through an addition included in your billing that this avenue to the court is now open, for them as well. This is not a personal lawsuit/ this is a public question of law; established by a personal guaranteed right under the constitution of both state and federal democracy: THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT to peacefully assemble, and TO LEGALLY PETITION those in our employ FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES! A matter that will include, other acts of treason against our lives, by those who refuse democracy itself: WE THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO DECIDE FOR OURSELVES/ what our future shall be; WHO and HOW, or IF, our lives, our earth, our nation, our nature, or all the rest, shall be gambled with! It's the law, guaranteed to me as democracy itself.
The conclusion of law fundamentally asserts, that I have a right to know the answer, to the legal question presented/ its called DUE PROCESS. You want money for a service the landlord does not use. I want to know exactly why I am billed for this service I do not use. Simple as that.
If you remove the penalties and fines, and return them not in this matter/ then I will not move to penalize you either in a court case that asks ALL LANDLORDS in this area to join. They of course will have their own ideas. If they refuse to join this case, or if they prefer not to pay their fair share of costs in this trial: then the matter will be dropped, and the sanitary fee paid. These are issues of a landlord with regard to billing. However the realities of DUE PROCESS, the guaranteed right of law that decides for our democracy; as personally guaranteed to me, through redress of grievances shall continue; as a legal demand, with or without.
Either way, we have reached an impasse at this time: support your position/ OR remove your claim. Or endure the question, "will or will not, the landlords of this area choose to go to court in this matter; and ask for money back"? The other option is; simply change all billing to reflect those who actually use the service.
Any attempt to cause harm to the tenants of the property WILL result in movement towards a legal action/ the various tenant unions, the laws that govern tenant rights, and so on WILL be established; punishments found. Even though, if turned off, their billing shall be paid, because they are NOT involved. That will not end this matter. Penalties and fines will be left to the courtroom/ in full public view: as not only the landlords have a claim, the renting public HAS a legal right to know and understand, and speak in this case. You are not "the government"/ you are merely an employee. You have no protections within government employ for illegal actions against the public or any individual; that is for the law to decide/ and you have clearly refused the law: NOT YOUR RIGHT.
The constitution that identifies and establishes the union which we hold as our democracy: IS THE GOVERNMENT. No employee, "is the government"/ no branch or agency or claim of "the government" is legal or valid by any employee of government. Only the constitution itself is the government/ because that is the agreement which brought and holds this union together. Therefore it is the foundation of our state, our nation, our law, and our lives. NOT YOU. That fact will be on display; in a courtroom battle, involving me.