The foundation of this case is protect me/ protect us from those who are disobeying the law/ and prove not even a judge can pretend the law does not exist.  Protect me and us, from those who are literally gambling with our lives/ our world/ our everything: and can destroy us.  NOT prove some facet of science/ PROVE THE PEOPLE, INDUSTRY, MILITARY, AND UNIVERSITIES:    ARE NOT GAMBLING WITH OUR LIVES/ NOT GAMBLING WITH NATURE/ NOT GAMBLING IN WAYS THAT THEY CANNOT CORRECT, CANNOT CONTROL, AND CANNOT REPLACE!  Because if they are gambling with our lives/ risking everything in this world we are, need, or demand for happiness and the hope to survive.  That is not only illegal/ but criminal and a felony offense.  YOU don’t get to choose!  You get to participate in the law, as do I. 
The constitution, both state and federal however,  requires of you/   THAT YOU MUST CHOOSE to protect and defend this people, this nation/ and by those terms this world.  YOU DO NOT get to gamble.  The court DOES NOT get to choose gambling when the threats involved can exterminate life on earth either by mutilation or fire or other as is the case today.  Thereby prove these do not gamble, with literal and real evidence/ OR STOP THEM.  SIMPLE as that.

Without doubt the court and defendants believe,  he didn’t have the subpoena served by the police, “we have an out”!  Contrary to that conclusion however is the truth: WHY should I pay the police to serve themselves?  How is that justice.  How is it not said, the police must communicate among themselves/ and with proof of service provided, and within the US mail for the state police as is correct for legal correspondence.  And with proof, had I sent any other letter that would have suggested “criminal intent/ rather than legal intent”.  IT IS ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN, that letter would have been presented within a courtroom of law and used to verify a courtroom action must be taken.  You have no standing in truth/ the rule of procedure lacks merit, or basis in fact:   because the defendant is the police.
I require in writing:   your intent. And I will refile, if you throw this case out/ and charge you with anarchy; because you have no right within the constitution to do so.  Procedure is not greater than the cause of this complaint/ and without proof of being told by the court:  to subpoena with money, to pay the police to “open the damn letter, addressed to themselves”. You have no case/ and I was not told to do so: the defendant is the police, “I did not scare them” is a valid assertion.
Your job is to protect the people, secure their lives, and provide them with a future that is fair, just, and certain to be within respect for life.  That does not include threats/ does not include employees for the people who refuse their oath and deny the law they are sworn to protect.  Your option is to use the law.  Your duty is to protect the citizen.  Your job is to enforce equal treatment before the people with regard to the law/ and that means those who break the law shall be punished accordingly.  Your job is to prove JUSTICE before the people SHALL win out!  Your job before the people is to prove you CAN be trusted, with equity, fair play, and equal treatment for all.  Is that not so?  Is that NOT what you are paid to do, receiving from the citizenry your salary and compensation for this very thing?  Answer the question, because if your job is something else/ should we not know this?  After all, WE PAY YOU/ and as a consequence we believe the job you do, is understood to be what we pay you to actually do.  Prove your job is “something else”; than to enforce the law indiscriminately, and protect this people from ALL threats.  As best you can.