Today, the last case in a series of cases; from complex and important established in law and with citations of authority; all denied without cause. ALL PROVEN by the law, but rejected by the judiciary, because it usurps the power over we the people/ proving, instead of freedom and liberty:  these employees and those who control them:  want slaves.  All cases:  Which prove that our democracy has been taken from us, ends with this simple jury trial that was described by  a simple stop sign ticket, as its beginning.

But even a rule, CANNOT be separated from the fact:   no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. 

Each guarantee of the constitution is a privilege granted to each citizen.  I am denied.   In this case, the judge establishes contempt for that order of the people themselves through their constitution:   by denying me the right to address, a legally assembled jury of the people, as described by the first amendment of the US constitution.  EVEN after in a legal court case, during trial: I have proven the fact, these people have a right to hear/ there very lives are in danger, "without objection, as to the fact".

 THEREBY, my petition to the government called WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE AND NATION.  My demand for redress of grievances as is the law/ my clear and certain need and duty to establish in a courtroom of law: what is distinguished as the liberty to defend my own nation, by "freedom of speech"/ are all denied.  I am slandered, with the word "criminal"/ and because the jury is so deliberately tainted by the judge, that they are unable to act or react due to his prejudicial conduct in manipulating/ controlling/ and contaminating the jury itself: that these people are UNABLE to hear or consider the words JUSTICE/ FAIR PLAY/ LET THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME, and justice is a reality not a rule. Which means it was NOT a "jury of my peers"/ but an intimidated collection of people, unable to choose for society as democracy demands.  That is an illegal court.

 That there are grievances so horrific and so insane by the leadership of this state and nation: that we are not only bankrupt by their hand/ we are threatened with extermination from the planet, or every life on earth mutilated beyond repair.  These things the judge stood against.

The judge not only forbade even the term redress to be used in front of the jury:   he challenged that order given to me;  with contempt.  Even though redress is the law, established by the legislatures of both state and nation, and signed by governors and presidents as the agreement of "we the people".  The contract we have made with our employees/ that they must obey.  The judge established on his own the terms what is required for redress to be used: stating only a law established by the legislature, and signed into law by the governor (president) may be used in court. Therefore he knew, or ought to have known: that the foundation of every law in this nation; MUST BE ALLOWED in every courtroom of law.  Both state and federal constitutions are that foundation/ but I am refused. Which presents us all, with an illegal court, acting belligerently against the constitution itself.  Ignorance of the law is no excuse.  The constitution is the law, both state and nation.

 The judge further states, that he knows of no definition that is adequate for redress to be used/ no precedent either/ nor has he any information about the critical legal definition and interpretation of a constitutional guarantee: TO EACH AND EVERY CITIZEN;  within the state of IL.   He establishes by his own testimony, that he believes redress to be "worthless in a courtroom of rules"/ even though it is equal and equivalent being issued as a guarantee to all the people through the first amendment.  The very same guarantee to the people;  as freedom of speech/ the press/ or of religion.

As this is the last courtroom of the judiciary in this state and this nation: thereby establishing EVERY LEVEL, has been tried and found guilty of refusing to obey constitutional law.  WE MUST LOOK TOO, the leadership of this organization as is the supreme courts both state and nation: because something proven time and again as common practice, IS GRANTED AND ENFORCED by their leadership.  Therefore the supreme courts of both state and nation are on trial; and we the people who own this nation, and this state; SHALL be their judge.

 Through the courtroom trials of James F. Osterbur throughout the years:   a plain, distinct, and proven conspiracy to deny that federal constitutional law called the first amendment & the state of IL fifth amendment & article 3 of the US constitution: (they refused to enforce the state of IL constitution, and make them obey our guarantee) is embedded within the judiciary, from the top down.

That is rebellion against the rule of democracy.  That is anarchy against the foundation of law that we set into place.  That is tyranny as expressed in the criminal act of placing rules over justice and the law.  Therefore a whistle blower case, wherein I am the litigant exists.  The demand this organization acts in ways that are illegal, and against the constitutions of both the state of IL and this nation called the USA.

  A demand for investigation and the return of our constitutional rights, as written and fully interpreted by we the people:  both for this state and nation exists.  A command that those judges who have refused constitutional law shall be disbarred, including those who sit on the supreme court; is considered the penalty most likely to be just. Let the people decide.   They held the authority to honor WE THE PEOPLE, but refuse it. 

While the judiciary has superior constitutional authority over the president and legislature/   IT IS WE THE PEOPLE, who have superior authority over the judiciary: IT IS OUR NATION/ IT IS OUR STATE.  We are the owners/ NOT they.  They are employees, simple citizens with a job which they received only BY SWORN OATH, that they would obey the constitution and hold it superior to themselves.  They do not.

This is now, the last legal attempt to set into place all that is important to life, this democracy, and this world: by providing the legal opportunity called:   we the people.  To demand our constitutional right, called redress.  Or more specifically the demand for accountability to us/ by our authority as a constitutional right;  over our employees.  This Creates:   as we investigate/ examine the evidence of what has been done, and decide what these employees are, or have been doing; for ourselves. by legal trial.   Our nation, our state;  our constitutional right to decide, what the future shall be:   IS OURS.  Our literal right, by one person one vote:   to establish the preamble of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSTITUTION;   what we believe to be in our best interest, as a free people/ as owners, NOT slaves or any other description of servitude.  We the people;    OWN THIS LAND, THIS GOVERNMENT/ THESE COURTROOMS; and we will decide for ourselves;   because,  that is democracy.

If you believe employees are going to put themselves on trial/ thereby simply surrender to the law:   you are mistaken, as these cases prove.  You must take them, by literally proving constitutional law IS THE RULER of us all/ proving no matter who you are, THE LAW will be obeyed, the punishment same for all.  To prove that a sworn oath IS IN FACT, a legal description that carries severe penalties for failure.  Is our right/ because it is our contract with you!

 I am found guilty of going through a stop sign at "one mile per hour" instead of a complete stop.  But it is redress that is now open for appeal.   As redress itself:   has truly been established in a courtroom of law/ by a judge, with all the necessary descriptions to address that matter in appeal.

 THAT REDRESS NOW PARTICIPATES WITHOUT MISDIRECTION.  As a distinct part of the case itself. The judge introduces it to trial, establishes the parameters, and declares that it is necessary "the first case must exist".

THE APPEAL, then recognizes everything that was admitted in the court including the exhibits, details, and warnings  provided by me:   THAT ARE OF REAL CONCERN TO US ALL.  The evidence will prove, the above statements are true/ and more.

Therefore the question is raised, "TO YOU, the people of this democracy":   DO YOU demand a literal hearing/ a specific demand, established in appeals; by which we the people CAN IN FACT, open the door to redress of grievances in a courtroom of law, and prove "WE ARE THE OWNERS HERE"?    Do you DEMAND: NO GAMBLING WITH LIFE OR PLANET/ unless we the people agree?

If you do/ THEN YOU MUST,   HELP ME.  I HAVE UNTIL MAY 12, 2012 TO FILE AN APPEAL.

 BUT IF YOU, do not;  by FAILURE TO establish your name to the petition:    OUR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES MUST OBEY THE LAW.   Or IF YOU fail to appear in time, to assist in this matter with your voice & your actions to organize or represent democracy for yourselves.  Searching in all manner and means and methods for the voice of:   WE THE PEOPLE are UNITED, by our constitution, and our democracy: OUR GUARANTEED RIGHT AS IS THE LAW.   Then the appeal simply disappears.

 IF you bring to me an army by which I can enforce constitutional law because you provide the weapon which is your honest attention, WORK, and desire to show, and to prove:   we the people are demanding to be "a true democracy."   Returning ourselves to the words of the preamble of the US constitution:    Proving to those who believe they hold "the power over us"/ that today:   DEMOCRACY, SHALL BE " our way".

  Then I will quit "being a sheep" in court/ and grow "teeth".  That is up to you, as it is impossible to proceed behind locked doors, with armed guards everywhere, and arrogance spewing endlessly: to demand the law, without that army.  The illegal means to order imprisonment regardless of a right: is all I will get!   UNLESS YOU DO YOUR PART, at this time.

 Prove TO ME:  you will work for democracy and our future, our lives, your children, and our world.  And I will prove:    democracy is more than a word.  Its up to you.

The rule of justice is:   that you may NOT threaten my/ our lives, just because you want to; whether by the employees of government or not.   WE ARE THE OWNERS, NOT YOU.  Which brings us to redress of grievances.  The first amendment law of this UNITED STATES, equal in all regards with every other first amendment guarantee to this people.  Guarantee means:   THIS CANNOT BE DENIED to ANY citizen/ certainly not to "we the people".  But as has been established in this court:   IT HAS BEEN DENIED, not only to me, but to every other citizen throughout this nation and state.  Since our history began.  That is tyranny, and rebellion.

Not even a true and distinct decision, definition, or interpretation exists:   BECAUSE IF IT DID, then the court would have to obey it. They then deny us the law, our direct constitutional guarantee:   by simply refusing to interpret, define, allow, or establish through the certification called "a precedent, certification, or statute".  Even though the constitution is the foundation of all law, certified as our LEGAL rights.  These employees have refused to accept that law, denying our constitutional AUTHORITY and right;   "With a mere rule/ or absence of a distinct interpretation".

\

This case HAS CREATED the foundation necessary: for that definition/ that cause/ and that interpretation to be reviewed by the appellate courts, and be established as the law that it is. IN YOUR PRESENCE, BECAUSE IT IS YOUR LAW, AND YOUR GOVERNMENT AND YOUR COURTROOM.  That is the fundamental to be declared, in this appeal.  This description  will be more in-depth/ should the case continue:   but that is up to you, as it is clear and certain; critically proven throughout the court system not only of IL, but of the entire federal system/ its leaders, and its legislatures/ and its policing apparatus.  That our employees:   All who swore to obey the constitution:   deny redress! Which is constitutional law!   All litigants as are the defendants called in this case/ this review of the lawsuits created as evidence, in this trial of illegal acts/ a constitutional conspiracy to deny redress by     our judiciary.   Will be prosecuted for the purpose of identifying who will, and who will not obey our law.  No excuse will be accepted.  Those who  refuse the authority called democracy, OUR CONTRACT, WITH OURSELVES: THIS IS, "WHO WE ARE".  As in we the people are rulers here/ we are the owners, NOT you:  will be punished, and removed from their bench.

I cannot dissuade or enforce change:   as is confronting the reality and abuse of terrorists, liars, thieves, etc:  who did steal your money, our democracy:     to threaten our world, our lives, and our future.   Even to the dismantling of our democracy:    WITHOUT A COURTROOM.  That is up to you: you must fight for it, and prove democracy which shouts, "WE THE PEOPLE" exists.

This is a trial for WE THE PEOPLE: whether I live or die.  Therefore any lawyer who believes they can fight for WE THE PEOPLE, and bring a moratorium to stop these threats/ so that we can decide for ourselves.   Is encouraged to fight for that.   Any legal entity that desires in truth, to fight for our lives and our democracy with me; is encouraged to contact me for that purpose.  I will not, be paying you, but if you accept / this is for life on earth; THEN it is just as important to you as me. Money can be gained from the court, for you: is that not so? This is a trial, for the individual guarantee of the constitution of this state called ILLINOIS, and this nation called the United States.  The proof of what is, or is not true.  I am in charge of that/ I am the litigant, all legal aspects are subject to your review; but not your authority.  The purpose is now, NOT to collect further evidence, or opportunity:  but to win. The battleground; I consider to be, "is, life or death for this world".  Therefore NO sympathy will arise. If you are not able to accept those terms; do not come.

 To the people; you must understand that once this definition is established by law;  it is very hard to appeal, "a failed definition that does not give us our constitutional right".  Is worse than none.  Consequently, you are warned: this case is established first/ therefore it HAS PRECEDENCE.  Therefore its decision shall have "first rights".  But there too:   it will be the weight of your own signatures, your own work;  that gives it presence is a courtroom of law.  If you fail to prove, "we the people" DO,   demand this shall be done for us.  Then you will lose everything necessary for your future as a democracy enforced.  Simple and plain:  by ourselves/ for ourselves/ and of ourselves, courage is required.  It's a choice.  The functional definition of redress begins as, and is established as. If you wish to contribute to that definition: then you must demand redress, here in this trial, by commanding the court to provide it to you; AS THE RIGHT TO SIT IN JURY for yourselves.   TO HEAR as redress trial: the evidence of threats/ the reality of democracy/ and the consequence of failed employees.  So that you may decide OUR FUTURE, for yourselves. this very thing, is democracy.  Prove it exists.  Such things are NOT POLITICAL ACTS: BECAUSE OUR LIVES, OUR EVERYTHING IS AT STAKE, EVEN THE PLANET ITSELF!  Therefore the law MUST intervene.  Make that come true, whether I live or die.

You now see two separate cases: one to prove constitutional authority/ and one to prove "YOU SHALL NOT gamble with our lives".    This second is yours to prosecute;   BECAUSE IT IS AN IMMEDIATE NEED!

The petition:   FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES/ OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.   Shall be given 6 months to collect signatures/ but bear in mind, even one second too late for such things as bringing the same fire as is on the sun here to earth, OR a mutilation that infects us all: means we are all dead.  So I do encourage you all: "to hurry". 

 IF realistic cause by signature is established;  to start and establish this appeal, by the first part of may.  THEN,  It will go forward.   BUT;  If not, the entire process of legal participation as WE THE PEOPLE, will disappear.   It is up to you, simple and plain.  Do you want redress to establish WE THE PEOPLE ARE OWNERS HERE/ or do you not?   It is a choice, and there are no excuses;   it is your choice, and you will enforce it by choosing to either buy/ demand:  media time, ETC/ ETC/ ETC.

YOU WILL PROVE,      BY DOING, what you can do to establish constitutional law you have been denied;   or it dies, and perhaps you with it.  Do read, THE SITES provided;  and their CASES as this will contribute to your understanding of law & primary threats.

What is important is: that we are threatened as a world/ as all of life, and even planet; by what the leadership has done.  Because only "diplomas": are allowed to participate in leadership today.  The following proves true.  The university religion (we are your saviors/ believe only in us);  the university cult (established by those who are so insane/ they believe themselves capable of being god; and gamble with our lives, our everything). Have threatened our lives/ stolen our money, and used and abused this democracy.

   Those who call themselves "superior" have proven to be  LIARS/ the University graduate who became so insane: they no longer believe they can be wrong threaten our entire planet. Those who stole our money for themselves: are thieves.  Those who refuse every avenue that establishes LIFE FOR THIS PLANET MUST COME FIRST; using the term "expert" to deny us our safety and our rights:   are cheats.  Do these NOT  seek and literally demand:   "Let the future die/ let the children be cannibalized".  Because that, is the reality of what they do. They took democracy, and declared themselves rulers instead of constitutional redress; thereby stealing, "our right as we the people to rule ourselves".

 BUT MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY THING ELSE IS:   THEY DO INSIST, "WE WILL GAMBLE WITH ALL LIFE ON EARTH, through endless mutilation of all life/ with bringing fusion (same fire as is on the sun) here to earth, a fire that cannot be put out/ and more experiments that are so extreme: the TRUE RISK IS, even the entire planet itself,  may not survive.  How is that NOT a religion of bastard's & cults? A reality of the power mad, and the absolutely insane!