No. _________________________
IN THE US SUPREME COURT
for this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

James Frank Osterbur
petitioner,  pro se
www.justtalking3.info

vs.

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IL DEPT OF AGRICULTURE OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT
Environmental protection agency for the USA, Chicago office IL:
Department of OSHA for this USA.  Chicago area
Department of traffic safety for IL
Department of human rights; IL

added  is: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
represented by: THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THIS USA, Donald B. Verrilli Jr

DATED: SEPTEMBER 6, 2011

on petition from the US district court for the state of IL central division Urbana IL
A PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT
DATED   September 2, 2011

petitioner files pro se as a citizen of this USA 
James Frank Osterbur 2191 county road 2500 E, St. Joseph IL 61873

 


THE QUESTION PRESENTED TO THE COURT:

The protection of the people IS a primary element of constitutional direction and law/ thereby the past, future, the present, and the possibilities of harm MUST be known.  Prior to letting anyone,  gamble with our lives, our everything!  We must know, the truth/ when challenged with an invasion that disrupts, or could damage our lives!  That job of protection includes the investigation of ALL threats, and potential threats;   as best you can/ so that we, the people can decide.
“Amendment 4; the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable.....seizures, shall not be violated...”
 WHEN CALLED UPON, those employees representing both state and nation; city, or others:  MUST identify the realities of harm, and the possibilities of OUR democracy:  so that we the people can attain our  GUARANTEED authority as WE THE PEOPLE.  Amendment one.  To petition the government for a redress of grievances.


 The right of the people to be involved in their own fate, their own environment, THEIR FUTURE, by the protection of a child.  Against all invaders. Against,  the consequence that is our critical consumption of resources: the reality of ALL children threatened. And much more is fundamental to justice and right.  It is our nation.  None, have a right to attack us. None, have a right to hide from the truth, OR:  our reality.
“section 2. 1. The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under this constitution...” 
The fundamental sanctity of life shall come FIRST/ not money!  Is a foundation of every democratic principle and direction for this nation.  None can deny an attack on the future, A GAMBLING WITH LIFE, RESOURCE, PLANET, BODY, WATER, FOOD, AND MORE:    IS an assassination of people/ children/ or those not yet born, by reducing what they need to garbage.
“Amendment 7, where the value in controversy... the right of trial by jury shall be preserved....”
THERE, in this trial Is an attack against the future of this people, this state, this nation:   by those who believe their money or power;   grants them rights beyond our own. That liberty or democracy have no say.   Thereby establishing a war against those who otherwise cannot defend themselves; because of this power or money.  Orchestrated by those with too much power, or money: we are required to accept, what is NOT in our own best interest.  THIS COURT is then,  required to choose for the people.  We as owners of this nation have rights!  We the people have redress, as the law granting our own democratic authority under the constitution:   so as to choose as a society, for ourselves.  It is your job, as the court:    to establish that guarantee!    The preamble:


“...In order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution...”

The second question presented before this court is:

           In case 11-cv-2023:  HOW IS THIS the lives affected: their guaranteed right of due process? MY GUARANTEED RIGHT OF DUE PROCESS:   to be denied an order of the court to proceed as the law allows.  Abandoned rather than served by the law!  How is this: THE LAW SHALL PROVIDE A REMEDY?” My constitutional rights provided?

 

The question presenting for  an extraordinary writ:


Having established case 10 mr 906 in champaign county court for the state of IL/ that case, whom the circuit court refused to allow or provide the proper names and addresses of the government officials to be subpoenaed (bias, and the systematic protection of the few against constitutional law: traitor)/ was removed by the courts decision to federal central district,  court  for the USA;  Peoria division/ as case number 11-cv-2023.   Which was they then removed by the decision of that court; back to the US district court; Urbana division.  It has now been months since any filing has been made by defendant or the court/ months past the date I had filed a motion to demand judgment must be made.  NO reply.  Not a solitary word about the constitutional questions raised/ complete avoidance.

Therefrom and in accordance with the fact that in case 10-2146; a case filed in the 7th  appellate court/ Chicago IL;   a court which threw the case out claiming the fee was not paid. ( a lie: the case, Destroyed from the record, a tyranny) Even though I had previous filings in this case:  and NOBODY gets a case number until they have paid the fee. (Truth and reality).  WHEREBY the local FBI was sent a letter apprizing them of this situation/ NO response. (Disrespect for the law, and this citizen is bigotry) This is a reality, that existed:  after I reminded this appellate court how they had lied, cheated, and stole my rights in a previous case; by sheer fantasy ( a ruling completely without substance in this case: ALL LIES) and delusions cases number 94-1943 & 94-1944_.  (Anarchy)


and again: A state of IL circuit court case 09-lm-1414 that existed from a contractual dispute in healthcare; I asked for a specific service/ and was charged for another!   Wherein the judge demanded “he cannot understand/ what any grade school child over the age of ten could”. Because I demanded redress, or more simply: LET US, fix this now!  He lied. (That is Criminal contempt: and a conspiracy to deny my constitutional guarantee of redress)  Which became 10-2055;   a demand the judiciary shall understand; obey the law;  and apply redress to the foundation complaint:   WE THE PEOPLE have no rights in healthcare billing/ they charge, and we are enslaved.  Redress is mandatory, IT IS our guaranteed right as a nation.  Discarded by the court without a single word acknowledging constitutional demands or filings: (that is: organized crime, the fact of a judiciary,  at all levels:  determined to deny the constitution of this USA/ this state of IL as well.  THAT IS TREASON)
Therefrom and in accordance with the fact that I had to have the pro se clerk from the supreme court establish and create a demand for an order of the district court in Urbana to be extracted from and given to me;(desertion of duty)  in case 10-2257.  So that I could proceed:   which is now US supreme court 11-100.  Clearly defines a courtroom of this USA and this state of IL:   so devoid of justice/ and so determined to control the people, instead of serve them:  as if it were “one court deciding against redress”.  That is evidence of  a true conspiracy against the people/ to deny,  their guarantee of redress can exist.  (That is, according to the declaration of independence: when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism..)   Is an act of war, against the United States of America.


And again: case 09-lm-1414 proceeded on its own to state appellate court; which then became appellate 09-10-2010 and subsequently IL state supreme court 111868 demanding that redress for this state SHALL allow the people to intervene as a democracy for the purpose of their own healthcare and subsequent financial obligations.  Or more specifically we have the right:   to our authority in redress IL constitution section 5:  as owners, to decide for ourselves what is or is not fair, in healthcare; and change what needs to be changed.  Denied.  Judge Difanis in rehearing 1414 proving constitutional law deserves nothing; “the only inalienable right/ is the one holding the weapon; the judge”!    A conclusion in the court, that surfaces and is proven after another healthcare financial complaint: THERE MUST BE EQUITY/ THERE MUST BE APPROPRIATE BILLING, commensurate with actual work done;  in healthcare.  Established in the court as trial _USDC C.D. ILL. district trial No.  05-2038


Therefrom and in accordance with the fact that I had a case presented to the danville circuit court/ for vermillion county of IL.  Osterbur vs. Selimi.  A case wherein I did present clear and adequate testimony of the cause and realities involved in this contractual dispute, the defendant,  accused of  criminal contentions, the intent or reality of assault with the intent threaten for the purpose to steal, what was owed to me.  In response:  I paid the money, to this court/ I  summoned the defendants/ I testified and prepared a sworn statement from which NO retraction was given: thereby my physical presence was absolutely unwarranted: merely frivolous and without merit.  In this minor issue, of a motion to dismiss: that held not one possibility of dismissal from the law by honor/ justice/ law/ rights/ due process/ duty; or any other excuse available to this court.   Instead of the law, instead of justice:  I  WAS NOT even provided any correspondence from the court/ nothing as to the outcome of the motion, or dismissal of the case..  Nor did the court send to me   Notice as to the date, not as to the time or place a motion was to occur.  But I was presented with a letter from the defense suggesting “I could attend if I wanted to”.  If the defense knew how to find me/ SO DID THE COURT.  ( clear and utter prejudice/ the demand of justice and law overruled by “the money and conspiracy owed to a lawyer: we rule, or more simply as in all criminal conspiracy:  none other is allowed”).  I was, Thrown from the court, without merit: because justice did not matter.  Simple and plain.  I stood in front of the court on that day by all that transpired prior to that moment, even though I did not physically attend, this motion hearing; whose only legal purpose could be:    to be certain the defendant knew what he was being charged with. As there was no part in any complaint asking dismissal that was within the terms of justice, equity, fair play, or constitutional demand instructing the court to be, what society intended that courtroom to be.  Neither was there uncertainty in the charge. This hearing could only be marked by trickery and treachery; the game of playing “we, the lawyers (including judges), own the court”/ PAY our price, or we feed you to the hogs”. [Not uncommon: as is proven by the treachery of case 92-s-2991"a judge that believed he was the law.  Or lawyer trickery case _02-1-126_.] games NOT justice.
Any legal avenue that would have occurred for the purpose of justice or law, would have proceeded with a written filing stating the realities of the case to be defended against.  None of that, but an immediate, without substance declaration of motion to dismiss: which means collusion existed with the judge.


 I WAS THERE in word and deed: clearly identified, BECAUSE IF ANY PART OF THE WRITING AND FILING which had been presented to the court:   had been considered slanderous or threatening or in any other way legally inept.  That could and would have been conceived of as a method for imprisoning or charging me with a crime: IT WOULD have been used against me/ as if I had stood directly inside a court.  Therefore my words do have that same gravity and they did have that authority, to represent me as if I stood there at that very moment.   THE WRITTEN WORDS by me, signed by me/ paid for by me/ summoned defendants by me.  DO, also stand for me in court, in this minimal hearing to determine if cause exists. My statements were clear.  Without question it did establish my cause and complaint in court.   But, Thrown out, without even a letter stating it was so/ not a transcript or recording/ absolutely nothing.  A court without values or honor or respect for society or life or me.  An utter disgrace, and a vile disease.  A courtroom overrun by attorneys and failures: who have confiscated our law, to make it “their rule and cause for rape & plunder”. (a court that has fallen victim to terrorist invasion/ because this is not justice, nor law/ it was not constitutionally valid.  It was ridicule of me, and my demand for justice as a citizen, and a society:  owed my day in court, but refused).


Further:  You come after me for 7 years or more, in any issue of money, the IRS comes at me, for 2005 taxes/ withheld, because you the employees of this OUR government:   removed the right to challenge realities and cause in our government which is the agreement of the people in our constitution and foundation documents: to achieve “a more perfect union”; etc.  Our employees act: As if you are sovereign, instead of the constitution itself (that is treachery;  the intent to declare yourselves who are simply  employees: to be RULERS instead).  The university collegiate debt you give to demand money forever; with clear, religious fervor: it is religion in government choosing the university, over the people: , because you are believers/ and that is illegal.   BUT IN THIS COURT at that time, I had thirty days to demand the money owed to me;   before the damn court threw that process away as well.  When I am robbed/ when the next job is in jeopardy because of criminal intent and reality:   IT IS my right and my need, to take the time necessary for my business. To act and decide what must be done first.  Without legal notice or rights or information of any kind presented to me; you stole my money/ same as a thug in the back streets, with a gun.  This judge took the power of the court, and made it a weapon.  A clear constitutional demand: turned to fraud in the courtroom/ DISGRACE/ DISRESPECT,  DENIED by the court; without the slightest speck of justice given.


Therefrom  a disease of arrogance and power in the court; a hypocrisy so extremely destitute of value or truth/ that OUR justice system:  is owned now, by the lawyer; and its only purpose is to steal from the public.  Or more simply, the reality of a courtroom is:    justice be damned/ the whim of a judge is all that matters.  Rules that interfere with justice, are tyranny, NOT fair play/ NOT constitutional law obeyed. They are anarchy.  THIS IS,  An arrogance in the court revealed:  without the slightest respect for   DUE PROCESS.   Due process is:   the reality of JUSTICE AND FAIR PLAY as it conforms to the needs and values of society AND to the citizen as promised.  None of that here, in these courts!  A failure of the court, without the slightest proof of constitutional law and direction obeyed: instead ridicule with words throughout such as “frivolous, incomprehensible, ......”.
THAT is not your job as a courtroom:  so says the preamble/ so says the right of due process.  So says the fourth amendment: MY PROPERTY was stolen/ my rights were stolen/ my courtroom was stolen/ my right of trial by jury was stolen. In each and every case.  And in the Selimi case:  this court reduced me to a slave, (I worked 6 months for free, because of this court/ the judge who sold me, and my rights, as if he owned the court himself, for nothing but arrogance and hate of a pro se litigant).  That is tyranny.   By rendering me,  without the law, he made me slave: therefore without justice. By using an assumed innocuous rule/ every guarantee of the constitution removed. It produced a failure of the court/ proving the court itself belligerent and without duty.   The judge,  gave my life away to this person whom I HAD testified:   did  present to me/ is accused by me: of  criminal conduct, threat, acting strictly, with the intent to steal.   Which he did, by using the lawyer whose only intent and purpose:   was to deny justice as well.  An enemy of the people.
And there are more cases each proving the court is a failure.  Or more clearly a prejudicial disgrace and disease:  to this nation and this state, and we the people.  That must be changed.

Amplification of the reasons

These are then evidence of:  


A CONSPIRACY TO DENY TO ME, TO STRIP FROM ME:    THE RIGHTS AND FOUNDATION OF LAW, guaranteed to every citizen, WITHIN THIS STATE OF IL AND THIS NATION.  Your rules of the court are NOT law/ they are merely demands of a judge:   and they do not exceed or surmount the law itself.  Which makes any judge who chooses a rule shall overpower the law:   instead of the law itself, shall decide through justice:   and the constitution which forms those laws, shall govern this trial:   a damn liar!  These courts and the employees for the defense:  abandon me/ steal my money/ and refuse to honor the foundation of all US citizens:   that we are a society governed by law and OUR constitutional guarantees.   We are not governed by employees, and that includes judges.  We are governed by the constitution, and laws that are within its authority and by its  discretion:   the foundation of our society, our agreement as a people, that this is who we shall be..  That is democracy.  Any employee who steals this from us, is a traitor.  There are more cases, each representing a judiciary that is bordering on anarchy and treason.
As is constant, and proven in every case that demands a constitutional guarantee, only to find the employees within the judiciary (state or nation); WITHOUT EXCEPTION in every single case: remain absolutely mute, deaf, and lying about the truth in terms of that constitutional demand.


AND THAT, is more than sufficient to extend the rule of extraordinary writ to me in this case extending from US district court 11-cv-2023.  More than sufficient cause to resurrect these cases and prove what is the reality of dishonor in this court system and correct it for the state, & nation.

THE QUESTION ESTABLISHED

 BEFORE THE state and federal DISTRICT COURTS:   NOW AT YOUR DOOR, because the state and federal courts of IL have proven unable or unwilling to establish the truth of what our USA or state of IL constitution means.  They refused constitutional guarantee: with prejudice, lies, and behaviors unfit.
 The question is:  
 WHERE DOES THE LAW DIVIDE UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL RULE:   between the freedom of money, or the power it represents as one individual or, one small group/      versus,  the liberty of one small town, its people and its close-in community to say THIS is too much!  And more specifically does  this entire nation, OWN the liberty honored as life, to choose for itself.  Or more simply does the money rule, OR does this democracy called WE THE PEOPLE rule?     Its a simple question!


THE CONSTITUTIONAL demand is presented before this court as the right of REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES according to the first amendment of the US constitution and the fifth amendment of the IL state constitution.   Because as it has plainly been demonstrated:   these employees of the people/ have each refused to do their job and participate in the protection of the people/ the defense of the constitution/ or the judicial reality of liberty applied by democracy: as the means and foundations necessary to support our own lives through the courtroom.  AS WE THE PEOPLE/ not, how much damn money you got, for a shit head lawyer (ONE quote in the Selimi case was $400.00 dollars an hour, to represent this case; where a large percentage make $10.), who knows little and steals more.  How is that justice, particularly when the court insists: since the contract (which the court refused to enforce)did not contain lawyer fees for the collection process/ they could not be charged by me.  Even though I could be charged with them, by the defendant.  The courtroom is a fraud/ the conspiracy most enforced:   WE THE DAMN LAWYERS, want your money.  TO HELL with justice, law, right, or society. Nothing more than; “let them be our slaves.


 Both freedom and liberty:   are at issue in this trial, as it has moved, under the state of IL constitutional grant of redress for this people and has now extended to the US constitutional grant of redress for this people.    Or more simply, since our employees refuse to do their jobs/ WE MUST protect ourselves with redress of grievances.  We must fight for our liberty and defend true freedoms for the individual.  By confronting the use of money to control everything. It is merely a tool/ that has become a weapon. The use of money to disrupt, disturb, or destroy my world/ our world and our future, regardless of a claim that is valid.  The reality instead:  “I can take anything I want”.  Whereas the constitution and its guarantee of  LIBERTY; by the democracy called WE THE PEOPLE:  says no.  Democracy enforced IS MY DEMAND, as written in the constitution itself.  NO interference by the court/ rather truth, justice, reality, and foundations that will allow the sanctity of life and nation to go on.  NO MORE FANTASY, NO MORE DELUSIONS, NO MORE UNIVERSITY RELIGION, NO MORE ANYTHING BUT TRUTH, LIFE FIRST, AND JUSTICE; in the courtroom of this state or nation.

 

Amplification of the reason

Contrary to the assumption of “men and money”/ the reality of freedom under the constitution of this USA is not governed by “whatever you want to do”.  BUT BY THE DEMANDS of the US PREAMBLE to the constitution (our promise to each other for what this nation is intended to be)/ along with its amendments which govern the reality of what is allowed, or not in terms of our relationship with the employees who are hired to translate and determine the reality of society in general.  The bill of rights which established the truth of what those citizens who sacrificed their lives intended that society should provide in return.  And the declaration of independence which clearly states;    A free people SHOULD NEVER be overrun by the simple powers and demands of those who took too damn much for themselves already. Or more simply “money shall NOT be used as a weapon here”.


Given that foundation, the clear understanding of freedom is, or is intended to be:   we will not interfere with your personal life/ so long as there is no real destruction associated or established against the rest.   Its do what you want to do/ but dont hurt our lives or our world or our future in the process.  Its DONT GAMBLE with me, or mine, or us!   Simple and plain. 
Thereby the question presented as to freedom is:   when does your money, become our pain, or our cost to bear:   because of what you chose to do, or the damage of what has become a confrontation to our world, or my reality.  A reality by the decision of a few/ that demands:   our lives are or will be changed, our future altered; our environment damaged or destroyed;   do to your actions.   As a result of your money.

Given that interpretation of democracy through the law is: THE QUESTION OF LIBERTY (which is WE THE PEOPLE),  established by the power of the people to defend themselves through their constitutional demands and enforcement of that law.  Reality now demands a clear description by the people of what is:   the freedom of money/       VERSUS,   THE RIGHTS AND FOUNDATIONS OF LIBERTY:  We the people shall decide!   Or when does life come first?


The foundation of democracy exercises its due and its duty as our government of the people:   that we are one people by our constitutional law.  Therefore as one people, or more specifically in this case:   the power of the whole deciding for ALL/ under the constitution.   By the terms of democracy:   which is our vote, our duty to be aware of our responsibilities to each other/ the future/ the nation & state/ and even the world.  Is a responsibility born on the legal realities of WHO WE ARE, by the consequences of our truth.
The elemental demand of redress is to establish the parameters of this decision as a people:   was created to obtain and clarify our relationship as a society between those who have obtained significant amounts of money beyond the rest/ and those who are clearly “the rest”!   Our relationship with the law of our democracy:    this court as our employees/  as our representatives who are paid:    To be the accumulators of evidence, the investigators of truth, the defenders of justice and law:   so that we the people can decide with honor, discipline, and honesty.      The court has failed.
The elemental decision of WE THE PEOPLE, becoming, we must intervene:  What should or will;    our world and our relationship with life and money in society become?    The question being:   WILL WE THE PEOPLE, change our relationship to money/  to reflect our new realities, threats, and environmental challenges,   OR not?  As a democracy:   THAT IS OUR RIGHT as a society of we the people, WHO DO, own this nation.  We the people govern ourselves with the law we provide, under the constitution.  BY OUR VOTE, and the truth of our responsibility to life.

 

THE FORMAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION PRESENTED IS THEN:


   WHO OWNS THIS NATION/   the people with money, OR   WE THE PEOPLE; the living breathing working reality called   LIFE:   or more simply, ourselves?

Amplification of the reasons:

The elemental process of determining who rules, is governed by the simple reality of who gets to decide what will or will not be tolerated and done in this nation, state, or world that we influence; the future we decide and even as “this community”
Thereby the question of money, wherein its impact is clearly NOT in the best interest of community, state, nation, or world is confronted by the constitution and its preamble demanding that WE THE PEOPLE shall in fact build this nation for the singular purpose of what is best for the life of community, state, nation, and world.  That is its interpretation, and none can legally refute it.
 NOR is the reality of work that does NOT truly protect the future; to remain viewed, as anything less than:   an attack that has been demonstrated in everything threatened: a reality of gambling, and denying the future as is being done throughout the nation/ state/ and world.  To murder every child; THEY NEED, what you destroy, to survive. 
Nor is it a reality of money/ the consequences of a few demanding the others shall pay.  As is happening in this little community which began this lawsuit.  A reflection of what is in the best interest of this place or other neighboring communities which must be robbed of their business/ their taxes and jobs;  to support this one. Not constitutionally valid, a denial of liberty.


The question,  WHO GETS TO CHOOSE the boundaries between freedom and liberty:  : is paramount to democracy/ it is the meaning of we the people, as owners:   when we choose, as state or nation or community for ourselves. Not just the damn few, telling us “they can steal, if they want to”.    The money which has long proclaimed itself superior to the interests of community/ is not legally or constitutionally superior to life or democracy.  The freedom which does not recognize the reality of the whole, but cheats us all out of our substance/ diminishes our property/ and takes from our lives and our rights, “its wealth”.  IS NOT freedom by democracy/ but by tyranny.
The community establishing itself as a governing influence which does rule over the conflicts that confront it as a majority of the people, under constitutional law.  Conceives of democracy/ BUT it does not speak of liberty unless the future, unless the others that will be affected, unless reality by its truth: understood and considered as a relationship we must share with LIFE FIRST:  Is revered.  Want is not enough, wealth shall not continue as an army against us:   because if it is, THEN IT IS ANARCHY, and the element of treason.  We the people have rights, life first!

We then return to constitutional guarantees:   THIS is who we are to be/ this is what we are entitled too, BECAUSE we are citizens here.   So says the documents that declare us the UNITED states of America.


The question is:   WHO RULES?  But the answer is clearly, we the people/ because we own the constitution and its interpretation.   We are the United States of America, by our presence and possession of this land.  There are NO kings or queens (including judges), NO everything belongs to you/ and we get nothing.  Rather there is OUR RIGHT TO GOVERN OURSELVES, AND CHOOSE OUR SOCIETY/ BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OUR CONSTITUTION; and its directive “to do, what is in the best interest of society, nation, state, child, and world; as best we can.   Changing “by the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” (Declaration of independence).

Argument begins as the preamble of this USA CONSTITUTION:
We the people of this United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


The argument extends: ....we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;......laying its foundation on such principles , and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.....
The argument solidifies:   section 3.  That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of mal-administration;.....section 4 that no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges....   Section 15.   That no free government or the blessings of liberty can be preserved to any people, but  by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue, and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.
So says the founding principles of this union called America.  Their work merely needs to recognize we “ain’t just men”.

 

Parties to the proceeding
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:   the guarantors of our constitution, our democracy, our state rights, & our ownership as WE THE PEOPLE. 
These are, “The principles of this case” guaranteeing to the citizens of each state: that the state SHALL uphold and provide its constitutional guarantees to each of their citizens. Protect the constitution both state & nation: They have refused.


FOR THE USA:   THE SOLICITOR GENERAL   ROOM 5614, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania ave, NW   Washington DC 20530-0001
The originating defendants:
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
box 19281    Springfield IL 62794-9276
IL DEPT OF AGRICULTURE OVERSIGHT AND ENFORCEMENT.
Box 19281   Springfield IL 62794-9281
Environmental protection agency for the USA, Chicago office IL:
US EPA region 5 Ralph Metcalfe Federal building   77 W. Jefferson blvd Chicago IL 60604
Department of OSHA for this USA.  Chicago area
701 Lee st.   Suite 950   Des Plaines IL 60016
Department of traffic safety for IL
box 19245   Springfield IL 62794-9245
Department of human rights;   100 W.  Randolph st.  Chicago IL 60601-3218
added is
US ATTORNEY Gerard A. Brost   211 Fulton st.  Suite 400,   Peoria IL 61602
STATES ATTORNEY office Champaign county 101 E. Main st.  Champaign IL 61801
IL ATTORNEY GENERAL   500 S.  Second st.  Springfield IL 62706
champaign county circuit  clerk 101 E. Main st Urbana IL 61801
added as lawyers for the defense was: 
IGNACIA S. MORENO    Lawyer for epa requesting electronic filing from court/ no address to me.


AMY J. DONA     Lawyer for US dept of justice/ environmental and natural resources division/ environmental defense section   box 23986   Washington DC 20026-3986
TABLE OF CONTENTS                          Page 23
Question presented to the court                        2-4
second question                                                  4
question for extraordinary writ                       4-11
amplification of the reasons                            11-13
the question established                                  13-15
amplification of the reasons                             15-17
formal constitutional question                           17
amplification of the reason                               18-21
parties to the proceeding                                   21-22
the authority of law                                           23-24
state of jurisdiction/ constitutional provision 24-25
statement of the case                                       25-29
granting the writ                                                29
democracy in action                                            30

The authority
The US constitution and its foundation documents being the bill of rights/ the declaration of independence: ADDED IN  the IL constitution, for the state of IL.
All declare that democracy itself is a governing of ourselves by the laws that we create and enforce.  The employees hired, are given the resultant job and work of providing the services and realities of life and social structure that give those words their truth, and our lives its guarantees under the law as one society united by what we have chosen for ourselves to be:
the life we chose/ the nation or state or environment we built;  and maintained for ourselves.
That is not a guess, not a framework for excuses/ but a reality of time and purpose by the disciplines of work.  Its called DEMOCRACY, or more simply


 WE THE PEOPLE, must choose for ourselves/ and then build for life first, ourselves.
THE DECISION of these district courts in  trial 2023, was:  abandoned by the lower courts!  Making this an extraordinary writ.
Applied by the reality that your lower courtrooms could not find an answer to this fundamental question of democracy; therefrom, abandoning their duties.  An extra-ordinary writ is necessary.  The rule of democracy cannot be abandoned, by any employee:     it must be decided by constitutional law.

 

State of jurisdiction/constitutional provision
The foundation of democracy is our constitution, and its guarantees to each and every citizen.  I am guaranteed the legal right of redress of grievances.  The legal determination by the people, and through a courtroom:  to address the citizens of this place, this state or nation;  with this simple reality:    “ARE WE OWNERS HERE;  OF THIS STATE AND NATION”/   OR, simply we decide under constitutional law, what is freedom versus liberty.  Do we not?


  Their answer, which begins in redress through a courtroom:   determines the future of the case, the foundation of our time as a democracy, by our decision as a people.  And the consequent reality of what we will or will not do, or be, as a people.  Redress acknowledges a need to defend ourselves, our nation, and every other life that does depend upon our own decision.  That is the purpose of this trial/ the demand upon the court to provide the reality of a decision called truth in democracy.  Assembled by:  WE THE PEOPLE.
Not “me or you/ BUT BY US AS A NATION: exercising our authority as owners/  our right to decide, for ourselves.  Our right to learn the truth prior to any decision that influences and determines life or death, or matters of real importance.  Our ownership: which means the right to say, “no you may not/ or yes, that is our right; thereby it is your right as well”!  Our demand to distinguish and determine for ourselves what is gambling with our lives, our future, these children, or any other reality of life we shall express and establish as the legal reality of, we the people.  That is well within the framework of a courtroom, to establish and present the evidence/ punish the liar/ call witnesses to testify: and then let the jury called this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA decide/ by their vote.
Due process entitles each and every citizen with the right to understand what EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS does mean for their personal and national lives.  The privilege and the duty of being a citizen does NOT establish a “right to not care about nothing, but you”.  Rather it DOES state we are entitled to the jurisdiction of law: the right to be heard/ the right to be protected and defended by the court/ the right to understand, that we the people are:  this nation called America.  It is our union that makes it so/ our adherence to the foundation that we rule ourselves by law; to ability to create law, or change government, for ourselves.

 


 Statement of the case is:
The critical discussion that is our reality as a democracy/ IS our destiny served by; the decision we make.  Defining our existence As,   WE THE PEOPLE OF THIS, “United States of America”. 
Is this,  “that responsibility and respect for life demands:  that we the people are confined by our reality to understand the truth of our situation no matter what that is/ discarding want, to acknowledge and live under the rule called TRUTH. Because truth keeps us alive.   By Establishing what that truth is, we do establish a future; which REQUIRES the critical and real investigation of facts, resources, realities, threats, and the composite drawing of what our future shall be.   If we refuse to obey what truth demands/ then it is absolutely true, that we live or die based upon the resources available to us as humanity, or just plain  all life on earth.  That means when you deliberately destroy resources, or take more than is fair:   YOU MURDER someone in the future.  They needed it/ and you stole it to play games/ to indulge in selfishness.


Freedom is a personal opportunity, granted in society by access to the foundations and means as are appropriate and necessary or fundamentally desired by each one.   BUT freedom must be,   UNDERSTOOD:   to be governed by the future needs of each individual life, as comes to this world;   as well as yours.  In other words;  what you do with your life is up to you/ our agreement as a nation is to provide you with access or realistic opportunity as is fitting and fair for us all.  A reality that is equal and fair, is NOT the same for all/ rather understanding: if you never worked a day in your life/ that AIN’T the same, as those who rarely took a day off, but worked all their life instead.  You don’t deserve the same reward in society.  However society can choose to make access more fair/ thereby granting freedom;  between these extremes by the liberty defined as:    Limited capitalismThe right to demand as a society:    WE HAVE NEEDS TOO/ you have taken enough for this year, or your own  individual life.  WE HAVE RIGHTS AND NEEDS TOO! A question in redress for the people themselves.
LIBERTY, is the essence of our values as a society discovered and determined to be a place of justice for all/ an equality without regard to human differences/ as life in peace, harmony, and thereby happiness intended for all.  That does not come with “I WANT/ I WANT/ I WANT; OR THE PRIDE OF MAKING THE REST LOSER”.  Rather that reality of life and society is dedicated to those who are willing to define and create for themselves the law that governs their lives.  NOT as in politics, whereby we are encouraged to “vote for someone who will vote for me”.  But as a society of people discovered in democracy:    As owners, who shall vote directly upon the truly great issues of our time as ourselves/ one vote, for the law, as myself.  Not for any other to represent me/ BUT,  MY VOTE/ OUR VOTE AS A SOCIETY, on the laws, that affect us all. Another change, for discussion in redress.


 This is democracy.  NOT the turning over of society to the few to decide.  Whether they are voted into office or not/ but the relationship of society to ourselves as owners of this nation proven by the reality WE SHALL CREATE OUR OWN LAW.  We shall govern ourselves, by that law; ; and through the employees sworn to uphold that law or who will  be punished accordingly.
Money is neither enemy or friend/ it is a tool of society; governing the relationship that is the truth between what has been done/ and what has been promised to be done.  The current situation of nothing but lies and fantasy in money shall not stand.  Truth attacks the liar, thief, and cheat/ BUT TRUTH also  BLESSES those who have honestly worked and chosen for the value and descriptions that bring justice, equality, and fair play to life.  Choose truth, and you build a future for life/ accept lies, and you end with countless threats and extinction; as is real today.
LIFE MUST COME FIRST FOR THIS PLANET, and this nation!   Not simply whatever you want,  for you:   but what is truly in the best interest of the nation as well.  That is proven on the battlefield/ because HONORABLE soldiers put themselves in harms way & die, if necessary;  for a greater cause than themselves. That same reality is required of you:   TO CHOOSE FOR LIFE AND PLANET, instead of constant greed, pride, and selfishness.
This trial faces the truth:   that we the people have come to the consequence and reality, we can no longer choose “the simple way; of letting money decide”.  Today we must choose for life, or life and environment die as a planet; taking us along.


Freedom is not, “I must pay because of you”/   liberty is not, “we can make you do anything we want”:   RATHER JUSTICE AND FAIR PLAY choose by the truth we have built, as the foundation of our law, and our nation.  This is our way into the future.  By vote, and by law created as WE THE PEOPLE.   WE, are the owners here/ the constitution grants us the right to be, as a state or nation by who we choose to be.  The reality of LEGAL discussion for the purposes required:  deciding a constitutional truth or law for ourselves:   as is REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES for the nation.    Gives us all,  the foundations necessary to understand what is true, and therefrom decide for ourselves:   IF WE WILL let the truth and reality of our time decide for us. Or continue to be led by university fools:  playing with our lives/ gambling/ “soiled diapers”: the consequence,  a people lost to greed, lies, cheats, want, and failure.

GRANTING THE WRIT
Means, that we will investigate the foundations of democracy, and learn as the reality of  we the people:   what is our truth/ what is our future if we don’t act/ what is our decision as a nation/ and what shall we do, in this time, dedicated to the reality of who we are as individual lives and nation or world.  Who we will kill in the future, by the tragedy of resource carnage.
We the people will learn as OWNERS of this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:    What are, our options/ what are the decisions that matter/ what is the difference between want and reality/ where is our freedom, and what is our liberty.  We will decide,  WHO LEADS, and who follows:   we the people, or our employees. 
Or more simply WE WILL BECOME THE PROMISE OF TRUE DEMOCRACY, we DO, rule ourselves by laws we establish! 


You will learn, the meaning of the words    RESPECT LIFE, because if life, does not come first/ WE ALL DIE.   We are too many people on earth, for any other conclusion to be valid.

DEMOCRACY IN ACTION
Does NOT entitle anyone to simply overrun any business or industry with their want or their need.  That is never the intent of democracy/ as that is tyranny not freedom or liberty.  Rather this trial seeks to identify and determine WHERE the truth shall decide, between LIFE FIRST/ OR MONEY first?  This decision requires:   Where are the elements and essence of freedom, that shall surrender to the consequences of liberty?   Because our need as a society demands that this shall be so/ for the sake of life on earth.  Not by minimal causes/ but by distinctions created from the people;  that every courtroom can and shall from this day forward adhere too, and preform as justice for the people.
That means the ultimate responsibility is ours.   The critical decision that accepts NO MORE EXCUSES/ shall be yours! 
Contrary to popular opinion, democracy is NOT a political definition/ but a legal right to be DIRECTLY involved and thereby determine what OUR NATION, as we the people shall be.     The role of the court here, IS NOT to decide the full weight and reality of freedom versus liberty/ as that job belongs to the owners themselves as is defined by WE THE PEOPLE.  Rather the role of the court is to create and defend REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES;   so that the people themselves have their say.
 Deciding for themselves, the rights and limits given to one individual or a tiny few/  versus the rights of all, the future of all, and the destiny of this America;  as,  we the people.


The public brief; not filed


This is the removal of leadership for leadership sake; the end of limitless excuses to provide you with, “I don’t have to care”;  rather than rights, upon which we all depend.   That means the ultimate responsibility is ours.   The critical decision that accepts NO MORE EXCUSES/ shall be yours!   Because that is the meaning of,   WE THE PEOPLE.  We are responsible/ by your vote; by our reality that we cannot establish any portion of justice or democracy by ourselves: which leaves us all, with one vote for myself.  That means, the foundations WE set into place, in this time:   shall in fact govern our reality, our future, your child, and our lives from this moment onward.  One citizen, one vote (let the parent vote for the child, it is only fair;   as has been proven in this very day:   by the old controlling an intensive political champaign to rob and steal from the young.  And being VERY successful, to their shame).   The court is necessary, in redress to identify and create the investigation of evidence/ so as to prove the truth.  The court is necessary to summon testimony and witness, of our existence and our time/ threats, realities, and rights as are consistent with the purposes of redress: ; with punishment for intentional liars:   SO THAT WE THE PEOPLE can prove our democracy, is by our authority and the decision called ourselves.   Ownership means:   we do have the final say, under the constitution.  Thereby we do become the reality and the responsibility called owners of this nation/ this land called America.   But that is a duty, rather than a game.  It is our right, but there are no excuses for our failure:   these decisions prove, who we are as America.

Redress is the elemental proof of democracy/ because it can only be established by the will of the people through their own court system: their decision for redress,  repeated across the nation.  Until that legal foundation is truly  established.   We the people therefrom: demand accountability and warning and rights;    CHOOSING to intervene in the governing of ourselves/ because our reality demands it.   Or we desire it as a change to the liberties which govern our lives as one people, altering society for the benefit of all.  A moratorium is then mandatory on issues and rights that are in controversy:   UNTIL our own decision as owners of this nation can be made. 
Primary questions beyond simply: does the money rule/ OR LIFE, as we the people here are.

Without antibiotic (disease held back) feed, the entire livestock industry dies.  We have no other methods left, to raise anything. It will be the end of meat/ eggs/ etc, for billions. Confinement agriculture will stop, without antibiotics: what then? A more deliberate picture here is, that antibiotic feeds stop an infectious disease from spreading, because it if is not stopped immediately by blanket methods such as antibiotic feeds; the entire herd, or flock can be lost. These are not fed at all times, but more than enough to prove without them close confinement failsentirely. Antibiotic resistance is nearly complete (ended), for us too. Such is the result, "of easy/ I want to own it all".


The final sanctuary, for breeding stock we depend upon; in the arctic ocean, is now open / and "fish" will then be extinct/ numbers too small to matter. Thousands of ships fishing 24/7. "At sea, till full". I must make a living& I WANT more!
The fundamental truth here is simple; human behaviors demand that it takes a navy to stop the march of men and machines in their goal to GET ALL THEY CAN GET. To get rich, by taking all the fish they can take. Nothing less than force will keep the international fishing fleets from gathering all the fish they can. Simple as that. Without this last preserve, the numbers will die; we cannot replace them. Every year beyond this 2011‑2012 at the most will see starvation increase. Because nature can no longer defeat your needs; unless you help nature itself survive.
World human population grows at 2 million per week . You want what you can no longer have, an endless supply of space and time to do whatever you want to do. This earth is full. Any true population increase beyond this point is death to us all: nature cannot sustain us, and that means war, cannibalism, and terrors beyond your imagination. Just how it is.
7 billion people; living on 7billion acres of actual "growing land". One person per acre!  Look around you/ the concrete/ land lost/ etc.
If you take the agricultural lands declared by each nation, it becomes a rough picture of how much land is available. From that cities, and more are removed, and we see what is left for our survival; AND EVERY other creature not in the sea, or dependent within the sea upon what comes from the land.
Oceans polluted and dying. The incubators of ocean life destroyed.


People who do not like the water, do not care about the sea; simple as that. "Doesn't affect me/ WHY should I care"? But the truth is it does, because we are so many people living today, because it is the oceans that have made it possible. Without ocean contributions to our food supply, roughly one in six people MORE than now; will go hungry. Without hope, without food, without the possibility to survive, because this food source for humans is lost: who dies first?
People ready for war.
People war with each other as "large groups" because they want more/ or they believe they have no choice: something has gone wrong with our situation, and since we don't want to die/ that means you have to die, so we can live; or have more for ourselves.
The ogallala aquifer,  supporting roughly a billion bushels a year, is predicted to be empty in six years; dust bowl returns.
This particular aquifer has been considered "without end" we can do anything we want. That has already been proven completely false, and yet tremendous amounts of water are extracted everyday for fuels, for completely useless endeavors, for a "few pennies more" in my pocket. And many other selfish and insane demands made by men. We must establish the windbreaks necessary to stop another dust bowl. We must stop all but the most necessary use of water so that we can eat a few years longer. We must prepare for what you have done, because we have no choice left. Not a game anymore.


Scientists say: ONLY one inch, in fifty inches of rainfall, reaches the aquifer.  Here too. Contaminated by toxins people introduce. Do you know how many toxins are pumped into the ground beneath your feet? Dumped above the water that you drink? Dependent upon biological creations to "clean it up" so that when it reaches the aquifer, you can then drink it: being poisoned, being attacked with your antibacterial soaps, pesticides, mutilations, etc.
The court and your leaders demand:  we don't have to obey constitutional law/ because we did not consent 2257; even though it is in their sworn oath to obey. An impeach‑able offense 08‑1339. NOT democracy.. Not the people ruling2111 themselves by law!
Read any of the lawsuits (down the page) that I provide, particularly on this site and you will understand: the judiciary has made democracy and the courthouse "a game".
Scientists gamble "we can bring the same fire on the sun here/ and control it; but if they are wrong, we die".  Happening "today".
This is not a small matter, on any given day, one tiny mistake or failure, and atomic fire could be born: everything here is fuel. How is that not your concern?
University diplomas' Gamble: they can create  "the big bang" single most destructive event in the history of the universe; and not blow the planet up.
This is not a small matter, the reality of energy being used, the consequence of things being done; establish the atomic mechanisms that control time are being dismantled. The physical laws we live by as planet earth, is being changed. Energies we do not know, are being released; uncontrollably.


University arrogance and insanity, Gamble:  they can mutilate everything in nature, and we will survive intact? Fool? DNA IS NATURE, it is everything called life, mind, or body:  by the consequences of discipline, balance, survival, or beauty. And much more.
The endless promise of university is, "WE WILL BE GODS". The endless reality is, "you CANNOT even control your own money, or society without war" how little is the possibility you can survive changing creation itself. The answer is: terrorism/ the Armageddon prophecy (nature in chaos) comes true.

Noah's flood is proven true:  no other possibility exists to explain the oil and coal reserves.
Or more simply, the amount of these reserves proves a tremendous amount of living "materials" were buried in the same place, at the same time, even thousands of feet below the surface of soils. NO other method, than a world flood, could have destroyed so much, and buried so many in this way. It is absolutely clear that flood did exist. It is also absolutely clear, this earth WAS TEEMING WITH LIFE, at the time of that flood.

Evolution says "one piece at a time,  we shopped and chose/ without a brain". Life says, what can you do without: "a heart/ blood vessels/ lungs......"? We do need all the pieces and parts, at once. Can you exist without a liver/ kidney....etc?

Evolution is nothing more than a religion, whose primary priests reside in colleges and universities and American government politicians who demand "it's the truth"; even though they can prove nothing more than adaption (the evidence of "perfect design") exists. Shame on you for accepting such trivial pursuits.


Can you exist without the trillions of gallons of drinking water lost for fuels?

Drinking Water: is not an infinite resource. What are you going to do when the "well runs dry". Just like your money, when the fantasy and delusion ends: REALITY BEGINS! That reality is war, because without water we can't survive. Wake up to the horror of what is being done, to everything you need as life on earth. Too late means your dead.

We can calculate the fossil fuels burned, fire created/ we know how much oxygen content is required;  thereby we know, we consume more oxygen than this planet creates.

How is that not your concern? Just as is every other resource and reality of this earth under attack; so is the oxygen we breathe. Because fire demands oxygen too. We do know how much fossil fuels are sold. We know, there are forest fires etc; plus all the life using oxygen.

Everything that creates oxygen; lost / the trees under attack, creatures in the ocean , etc.

This is not a game, every creation that produces oxygen is under HEAVY ATTACK. Every trip you take with your car consumes oxygen, that life on earth then CANNOT breathe. This USA alone drives 3 trillion miles, every year! Every aspect of our atmosphere is limited, and we cannot make more; too late, is too late; we die.


One trillion dollars =  $10,000.00 per each of one hundred million people. 6,2 trillion spent for this year is $62,000.00, per each of one hundred million people. That is the math; that is stealing (federal reserve chart), that is communism.

Our human reality is: people want slaves. Plain and simple; to accommodate this demand, all manner and methods of enslaving the others is used. Although the methods change from time to time, the reality never goes away. People want to be "rich"/ which simply means: "To enslave others, for my own personal demands". The current means is simply to create numbers without substance, because so long as the people accept them: "monopoly money works just fine". (they make numbers/ we make sweat, tears, and sadness, because we don't get to share).

That is inflation hidden from us.

Debts that cannot be paid, are inflation; unless you just want to call it outright theft. Inflation is taking from the others, because you can as government employees "give to yourselves/ or your supporters" all the numbers. Which is simply saying: let the masses fight to survive, nobody cares. Regardless of the propaganda. Happens in every nation/ throughout all of history.

The pollinators are nearly extinct. Poisoned.  Few fruits or vegetables/ no birds, reptiles...a link in the chain of life missing.. Like the key in a car, where do you go?

Seems small, but it isn't! And these are only the beginning.


Www.justtalking3.info  Asking you to care, advertise/ etc!  Every child does, its their life. A humanity intent upon sterile plants, no responsibility, everything free.

There is more. Such as climate change: its cooler than expected, because when ice melts, it consumes heat (makes your glass cold). Such as biological weapons of mass destruction are said to be over 97% effective.[WHICH MEANS, the lives of nearly 7 billion people CAN be destroyed, by one single individual] Such as, the ozone hole does matter, because radiation similar to nuclear exposures will happen. Too late simply means war (I WANT more)/ cannibalism (nothing here to eat, but you)/ extinction (too little, too late). For you too! Not a game. Life or death a future decided for us all, today. A future determined by every person who can make a difference. You want to hate me, and do. But it is your own lives you curse/ not mine. It is your own future you deny, not mine. It is your own failure, not mine. I am irrelevant/ because only you can change yourself.
The evidence of a need for WORLD LAW/ thereby the end of a humanity at war: the end of all weapons of mass destruction,
is absolutely necessary. And possible.


The legal right to present foundation questions, to be decided upon: in redress,  by our state or nation:   DOES extend to each and every courtroom, as these decisions are made.  For or against redress:   the authority as owners to redirect and reestablish the direction, future, and cause of this state or nation itself is democracy.  One citizen equals one vote, under the constitutional guidelines that describe our nation: majority then rules;   as is consistent with democracy in action.

   We are overrun, by the people who declare;  because they have the money (numbers, in fact stolen from us)/ they shall decide our future, instead of us.  We are overrun by the people who declare themselves to be “experts”/ and more capable than we the people;   to determine what this nation should be.  THEY HAVE proven themselves: LIARS/ FOOLS/ THIEVES/ & FAILURES.  The end result:  We are threatened on every side/ bankrupted in every way/ and the future is destroyed by the evidence to be proven in this day as gambling with our lives.  We are overrun today, by people who believe they are superior to us, and have taken over this government, thereby this nation.  UNLESS WE CHANGE our reality;   and let truth decide instead of want & pride.  Unless we demand reality, and remove fantasy, religion, and delusion from our government  That is a choice:   to think and investigate for truth/ rather than believe what we are told .and die.   For we the people to decide for ourselves: NO “experts” allowed/   REQUIRES the knowledge that we shall then assess/ DEMANDS the understanding of investigation, which we will then decide/ and accepts that common sense the reality of trial and tribulation with real world consequences shall be enough to find wisdom..  One citizen equals one vote, smart or dumb: THIS IS for our life, future, work, child, society, and everything else.   Because fools mutilate every living thing, and we cannot put it back/ failures disease this earth with energy experiments that can literally destroy us/ and VERY much more.


The power to decide between freedom to do these things against life on earth/ OR THE LIBERTY to take that freedom away, and restrict, deny, or destroy the possibility of terrorists and traitors that gamble we are nothing.  Is not a game/ it is not money that has value, but life.  Therefore this trial is about WHAT DEMOCRACY TRULY MEANS, in a world that has been attacked by those who believe they can be gods.  But are nothing more than the diarrhea of rats.
Our ownership,  as ourselves: the citizens of this nation, bound by constitutional rights and guarantees.  Shall choose through the courtroom, what of these realities or threats (to be declared through redress) MUST BE INVESTIGATED and established by law: as the major issues of our time. As a jury of ourselves, we then vote for our lives, future, and nation.  Not a vote for someone to vote for me/ a vote upon the law, justice, reality, and fair play that will govern our lives in these the decisions that participate in governing, defending, and establishing truth for our very world.  Therefrom REAL democracy by its human truth, in America, shall be told.  Either good or bad, it is your choice!
LIFE becomes the decision that we made, LOVE becomes the trust we chose to keep, TRUTH is the description that honors us all because it gives time the blessing of a chance for happiness here and now.    But RESPECT:   decides the path between life or death for this planet/ not by my decision, but yours:   because every threat caused by humanity is real, and extinction, which does include your own;   is no game.  Make your decision. 


As a nation/ as a humanity/ as a world threatened by the decisions of men and university: [the leaders here].    WE THE PEOPLE ARE OWED,   Our choice.
 As a truth which recognizes the reality of being threatened with real and forever extermination, by the games of men:   which may include the very planet itself:   those called WOMEN/ female ARE OWED their own voice, and their own right to say,    We shall NOT be sacrificed for your failures.   We will, have our say!
CHANGE IS COMING, the only question here is:   which direction shall you go, to life or death?  What you want is absolutely irrelevant.  Choose for life and pay its price in justice and equality for all/ or you get the reality of men who played god, and their reward of threats & failure surrounding all, shall come true.  It’s a choice.
This is NOT a platform for me, to communicate with you/ THIS is a decision that you will make for yourselves.  I am irrelevant, just like want.  While these can make a difference;  ONLY The truth in you,  will decide.  Because the heart knows, even if the mind will refuse. 

Of all things driven by university fools and failure: as is evident by our reality/ THEY DO, control the decisions which brought us into all these threats; the possibility we will go extinct.  There is nothing more horrific than those who mutilate all of nature. “They intend to play god/ and you let them attack, everything that is life”.


Bringing us to the question: WHO is the bigger fool?  The media tells you to believe, and you do/ doesn’t matter what, you just simply believe.  While CERN will be “all done”/ planet lost in a couple of weeks in hell/ and NIF will be an entire planet of life lost in less than a week; sucking the entire atmosphere and ejecting it into space; just as well nothing but fire left.   The most extreme horror is the mutilation of life (biblically its called Armageddon; which means, nature in chaos).  This ain’t religion/ but you are fulfilling that prophecy as we speak.  Genetic stability is our bodies, our food, our balance as in two arms, two eyes, etc.  Genetic disciplines and processes are the manufacturers of every biological organism including you.  Genetic composition and purity are the foundations that give you a brain to use, and the ability to think.  THIS IS ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING IN ALL OF NATURE!  And you let the people most responsible for all the threats and tragedy we face in far LESSER things; play god/ and you DON’T care enough to stop them.  This is no game.  WE CANNOT “put it back”/ THERE ARE NO SECOND CHANCES IN GENETIC INTEGRITY.  It ain’t a simple numbers game.  ITS LIFE OR DEATH FOR A WORLD!    Could you stop AIDS? Or any pandemic?  No, you did not/ think about it,, not a game.  They are not learning/ they are experimenting.  There is A GRAVE difference!