Which is corruption in the court/ corruption in this nation/  and conspiracy between judges and all components of power in a courtroom.    Which is denial of democracy and a war against WE THE PEOPLE.  But so long as the door is closed, and the lights are turned out so no-one can see:   what does justice matter, some say.  “It ain’t me”/ hell he asked for it; serves him right.  Is that not so?  After all, even though this is a fight for the society we were promised;   he is just one man, what can he do/ should have known better.  Isn’t that right?
That brings the matter of justice, democracy, truth, nation, and the future of life on earth into your hands.  Into the decision that you will make, regarding this work.  You cannot depend upon the press; they do propagate whatever lie the owner demands; or find themselves out of work and “black listed”.  Its called greed/ ruled by the power to sway public opinion just because he or she can;   let the people be “a flock”.  It means:  Ruled by fear.  Soon the internet will come under complete control.  Soon the rulers will say to themselves; “we have to kill them/ they are getting out of control”;   because the crisis that is chaos is coming.

 Without a legitimate format to discuss and decide a future as society itself (the purpose of this work)/ there will be hate, with guns and fire; because that is what you chose.  The originators of the declaration of independence, believed the fight was worth their lives/ believed that others would join them, because if they didn’t; only torture and death were ahead.  It was a choice.  Without “lights on/ the courtroom door open, to see what the judiciary is doing/ and people like me,  who are willing to remind those “who believe themselves to be gods”: NO YOU AIN’T.  And prove the truth/ not for or against the judiciary itself; only for democracy and justice; there is a difference.  Its called with is the truth by the evidence?  There is only tragedy ahead.  Extreme threats, an economic nightmare coming, guns and hatred (you stole my life) all around.  And without redress, not a single “relief valve” in sight.  You should be ashamed.
The question of our future, or more distinctly your future at this time is unless you wake up before everything is lost: your food supply/ your water supply/ your nature/ your planet/ even your eternity? The answer will be, “its too late”.   Only you can answer that question; my work is done or in the absence of true revenge, “then nearly done”.  You have your chance, want it or not.  Storms come quickly, prepare now.  Ask your threats, what to do; and understand it is surrender or fight for life on earth.  Not war on earth/ but justice and truth.
As to the many lawsuits which have been created by James F. Osterbur as the plaintiff:   I give you this summation regarding the sanctions produced by the state court and certain to follow in federal court.   “He can’t do it no more”.
READ THE FILES if you want better;

They fail to list the very first small claims case in 1992; wherein I am made to pay for a vehicle bought from me 18 months (one and a half years prior), in full/ because someone intentionally vandalized the car, was not allowed to prove that fact, I was refused access to the evidence/ and did not even receive the car I had to pay for back.  An absolute failure of the court;; $1800 dollars and more to me.  No warranty was given. the car was vandilized, knife cut in radiator hose/ girl drives 30 miles knowing hot/ I repair for free. Second time no.

92-c-1561 is a trip to the hospital emergency room; whereby I was actually in the presence of staff for about 1 minute/ they then all retreated to an outside room to view a heart monitor, and never returned: I was the only one in that department at the time.  They NEVER asked me what was wrong/ never gave opportunity for me to state what was wrong/ and the main event occurred less than one month later, which robbed me of sufficient health to alter and change one year of my life; and influenced the rest.  For little more than that, I am charged a very significant amount; and refused to pay the entire amount, because the service I received did NOT warrant the money charged. 
92-c-1222 is the first attempt to claim real rights within a courtroom during a debate with a hospital: with regards to billing.   Make me an equal/ not a slave.  Bringing the press with me this time, the case moves on.

They fail to list the Danville case Osterbur vs Selimi; wherein after working for 6 months in construction of a restaurant the owner “tries to play mafia man with me” and refuses to pay.  That leaves me with an employee to keep working and money to find;   believing the court is realistic about such things I wait until I do have the time to work on this matter in court.  Only to be told its past 30 days, and there shall be nothing simple about collecting the money; case closed.  YOU CHASE ME FOR TAX FOR DECADES/ I GET THIRTY DAYS regardless of circumstances and thrown in the trash.  That then moves to direct court, testimony, truth, payment to the court, and a demand for justice.  The court fails to notify me of a date and time.  The lawyer for the defense states “you can come if you want too”/ I do not for a motion trial, a trial to make certain the defendant knows what he is charged with as is consistent with all criminal cases.   Even so, I am fully and deliberately in court: having proven that with money, with filing the case, with clear and deliberate testimony, and with my name on the books: all of which can be used against me in a court of law.  Which means I am clearly present in that court, on that particular day;   by the evidence.  The judge throws it out/ and cost me not only the right to claim six months worth of work/ but an additional $3000.00 that was not even in dispute.  Absolute failure.  I appeal: and the court asked me, “what do I want”/ THEY DON’T KNOW,   what is not bastard and fool in that?
The next listing is 02-l-126 a case wherein a dentist, uses fraud to claim he is owed roughly $80.  I go in with a broken tooth, waiting for the appointment to arrive.  He makes a chart about cavities, takes one x-ray and does nothing more; not another appointment either.  I don’t pay for nothing; simple as that.
State of IL 06- mr 726 is a demand for accountability from the state in terms of money. the court calls accountability gibberish/ the case is used to open the door to bigger issues; because you cannot take the federal or state governments to court.  They must take you, which means unless you owe them money, there is absolutely no access.  Not democracy!  As in an earlier attempt to demand contractual awareness and truth in how my taxes are used/ what I do owe at the IRS.  By their words nobody takes the IRS to tax court unless they agree they owe the money/ ONLY THEN can you go and argue you don’t owe the money;  it is a fools’ game to enter the trap and let them “beat you”.  the case is "open the damn door".

09-lm-1414 is a trip to the hospital, as described I walk to the counter deliberately ask for ANYTHING LESS than an emergency room visit.  The staff say, “yes we have that”/ I say ok then, I will accept that.  I am charged for an emergency room visit and an additional expensive test I did not approve.  I am told go to another doctor to hear the result no doubt an additional $300. To hear the result, and that is extortion.  Changing the contract is not what I agreed to/ and I made that clear.  The court refuses my contractual rights, to pay what I agreed to pay.  I received a five minute visit to er.  I WANT EQUAL STANDING WITH THE HOSPITAL IN TERMS OF MONEY, AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS. They refuse.  I want a fair and legitimate charge for services received. this turns into  11639, there are better ways, let the people decide. its called redress.
10-mr 853 is the demand for redress of grievances, a constitutional right of the people.  It’s the law!  A guaranteed legal right of the people, without option or interpretation by the judiciary.  THEY OWE US.  They refuse, an illegal act.
94-2001 is a review of the initial small claims case.  In a higher court.   I am owed better, than being charged to pay for what no one else would expect to pay for.  I am owed the respect of law.  The court says no.
94-2060 is a review of the initial hospital billing at provena and that trip to the emergency room described above in 1561 and 1222.  I WANT EQUAL RIGHTS IN BILLING/ FAIR BILLING REGARDING THE TREATMENT RECEIVED AND THE VALUE OF SERVICES RENDERED.  It demands better than being thrown aside regardless of the treatment received.  Both cases 2001 and 2060 go to appeals wherein the federal appellate court makes up an entire story that can only be described as fantasy land, words and evidence stated that are pure fabrication:   and removes the case by lies.
Your federal government, representatives are informed: they are uninterested.

04-2196 a billing dispute with a trip to the emergency room at Carle.  Working in a moldy environment ( mold killed the day before, I considered it safe/ it was not; too soon).  I went to convenient care/ they gave me oxygen believing a heart attack/ it was not; moved me to emergency; and I walked back out roughly 30 minutes after arrival; due to oxygen being administered.   The oxygen Saved my life/ or kept me from great harm; BUT even I knew I needed oxygen, a man who can’t breathe is obvious; no great training required.  I paid the first three billings in full without complaint roughly $5000.00 but at the fourth or fifth billing, I refused and went to court demanding “its all the same damn business” how it is I am charged by every “hidden door”.  I got oxygen/ I got a ten minute ride/ I got a bed to rest upon for twenty minutes in emergency: there are limits, and realities to business and life.  The court don’t care;   carle does change policies/ and tells me not to enter here again unless about to die.
05-2038 carle clinic/ claimed to be different than the hospital;   is treated by me as the same case.     
07-2040 the result of state 06-mr-726  IS best established by the words of its appeal

In the alternative, that this appellate court should intervene, and review the reality of justice/ the need for intervention/ the support of critically known (don’’t need to argue it) evidence that the nation and the environment and this society and this world are in trouble, and the need for an investigation into the truth and our reality exists/ of all that is held as a 1st amendment legal right to petition the government for a redress of grievances: then you may/ but answers are expected. Not more defecating on the consequence of WE THE PEOPLE, as nothing is more disgraceful or disrespectful/ than a judge who rules without the support of law. Without, The foundation of every law, which IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS/ the immunities provided to the people, by the amendments/ and the functional elements of what those constitutional documents spell out in terms of how the employees of our government shall do their jobs. And no law, no judge, no expectation supercedes them/ they are sovereign to the nation, to the judge, to the courtroom (all of them) and do function as the declarations of all the people, and their demands and duties applied to those who are our employees. No excuses exist as to ““we are the government/ or we are sovereign to the nation: that is a treason by those who suggest they have rebelled and taken over this government from WE THE PEOPLE.The question presented in law, for them and for you: when corruption and failure exist with clear and certain evidence of lies and theft and collusion among those in powerful positions: the people have a distinct and absolute right to investigate and bring the criminal element/ or failed servants (our employees) to justice. They have a right to security. They have a right to understanding their situation. They have a right and a duty and an obligation to secure the nation for themselves and their posterity: and in no sense does that exist today. We are bankrupt/ we are threatened with world environmental collapse/ we are threatened with extinction/ we are threatened with resource war, from inappropriate consumption/ we are threatened with mutilation because genetics are nature, and humanity cannot control it/ we are threatened by ““big science”” and more. WE HAVE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO TRIAL, TO INVESTIGATE AND DETERMINE OUR REALITY/ AND OUR NEED: AND THAT IS WHAT IS ASKED IN THIS TRIAL: WE GO TO COURT, AND LEARN THE TRUTH THAT IS OUR NATION IN TROUBLE. AND WE DECIDE AS A PEOPLE, BEFORE THERE IS ONLY WAR AND COMPLETE FAILURE LEFT.. It is your job, to accept this duty/ and make it happen: anything less is desertion/ treason/ or simply ““the desire to destroy the nation, the world, and life itself””; because that is what is at stake. No excuses make your decision; this is not a game/ and JUSTICE ““needs not a blue folder to understand””. Nor does it need the ““proper type, the proper etiquette, or a thousand other attempts to control the law, by removing the rights of the people. It ain’’t your court/ ITS OURS: DO YOUR JOB!    Denied.
08-2262 Is simply  EXPLAINED in this excerpt from  appeal
RE: YOUR LETTER OF A LIEN AGAINST ME 11/12/2008

you have proceeded illegally in this matter/ as you were informed this is still an issue being regulated in federal court as of this time. Currently proceeding to appeals ( HAS been filed/ but there is a docketing issue today). Federal district court Urbana IL case #08-CV-2262. Not an extension of the IL tax itself/ but a remaining demand for ownership not only in this state, but in this nation. A CLEAR AND CERTAIN reality set within the democracy established as WE THE PEOPLE! Whereby having noticed, and proven that the employees who have swindled us/ shoved us into bankruptcy as both state and nation/ and believe that they are above the law: Which demands transparency and accountability: BECAUSE WE ARE OWNERS. Has been violated, abandoned, and destroyed. The courts of this state having failed in every conceivable manner TO OBEY THE LAW. The courts of the federal government having failed in every conceivable manner TO OBEY THE LAW. And the final round of determining whether the leaders who are literally in charge of making their employees obey the law/ those who must choose, if this is a nation of LAW AND ORDER, as is appropriate and due in the process of a courtroom/ OR NOT. THE FAILURE of employees, to acknowledge the foundation of respect associated with taxes, law, life, or any other form of governing in a nation of WE THE PEOPLE/ WE THE OWNERS OF THIS STATE AND NATION. Is not acceptable. You want tax, I do not argue that as a reality of government. However, I DO demand transparency and expect a full accounting of just how much damage you have done to my life, to our state, to our future, and to our nation. It is my right/ if it is my debt! It is my right/ if I am an owner, and indeed I am an owner by virtue of the fact I AM A CITIZEN HERE. And either this is a nation of WE THE PEOPLE/ OWNERS, EACH AND EVERY CITIZEN/ Or some small group of terrorists, have come to undermine and take what is rightfully ours. Is that you? I have not denied you the tax. YOU HAVE DENIED ME YOUR ACCOUNTABILITY/ OUR TRANSPARENCY AND RESPECT AS OWNERS OF THIS STATE. Do your part and present me a full and complete transparency of all debts, expenses, payments, accounts, pensions: EVERYTHING I am expected to be responsible for. Everything you have as employees of this state spent, and handed me the debt for. I HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW/ OR YOU DON’’T HAVE A RIGHT TO COLLECT.
This case becomes US SUPREME COURT 08-1339   a question before the supreme court:    WILL YOU OBEY FIRST AMENDMENT LAW, AS IS THE LEGAL GUARANTEED  RIGHT CALLED REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.  A docketed case (it passed all requirements to be heard, as is evident by the number, and money paid)/ which means a judge must answer.  The US attorneys assigned refuse to argue against it.  It is discarded by the clerk of the court, dismissed.

State of IL 2055   is the judge leonhard case:   he refuses to obey the law/ I say to the federal court he must obey the state law.  A demand for redress of grievances according to the state constitution is made in trial:  The federal court denies responsibility. And discards.

Case 1414 is a contractual dispute with a hospital over billing charges/ I asked for a specific “not the emergency room/ or I will wait”.  I got billed for the emergency room; not fair. This needs to be fixed for all/ let the people decide.  General state appeals 4-10-0679 refuses.  IL supreme court 111868 refuses as well.  Leaving me open to all costs, “thugs in the courtroom”. No contractual rights or protection/ no constitutional guarantee.  Get out of court!

IL attorney grant refuses to list   10 mr 766 which is a listing of THREATS which can make us extinct/ which we clearly have a right and expectation to be defended from:   thrown in the trash.  Do read it!Which brings us to 2277 still pending.
10-2257 is a demand for accountability in government by redress of grievances for the people.  Refused, played with as a toy.
11-2023 is a demand for the boundaries of liberty versus freedoms called greed, “we are being overrun”.  Pending
appellate court 10-2146   “Went running away” after being informed I have not forgot the fantasies used before.  Claimed no money spent/ fully knowing NOBODY gets a case number, until the bill is paid.  
There could be more;   as in a fight with city parking over one nickel/ and the threats used against me.  As in a fight with city building permit/ over being delayed by months on a construction project.   There are more in appeals.
As in this ain’t no damn democracy/ this is liars and thieves hoarding power, and distributing lies.  Where only greed rules.   The summation is:   IF THE PUBLIC DON’T SEE/ THEN WE DON’T GIVE A DAMN: TAKE EVERYTHING YOU CAN GET!