Issue is raised by the court;  at a minimal verbal testimony in trial “accusing me of using a soapbox”.  The reality instead is: having found myself in court with an entire class from the U OF IL with the dean of journalism in attendance/ and a legal court reporter “telling the children” how to be a mouse, and pick up crumbs in the court.  A short and simple introduction was appropriate, and within 2 minutes or so, of my own beginning: the trial was over. Not a soapbox, a clear and deliberate introduction to a roomful of potential journalists: with the full and clear intent as proven in documentation filings prior to court: trial demand was to be constitutional law/ I was refused.  I now give this case to any and all lawyers: YOUR TURN!  Who will pick up the challenge to appeal and use this case, or any other;  to demand IL constitutional redress of grievances.  You have my address/ if you want me.