Plaintif Files Redress Preparations For Trial

In the interest of brevity, there are only two distinct issues for the jury to decide what is true:
1. As indicated earlier, the demand for FAIR AND ACCURATE BILLING resides upon whether or not the statement “anything but, the emergency room”. If the jury decides this is true/ then they determine what if anything shall be charged and paid by the plaintiff.
2. The jury decides: IF THE LAW of first amendment redress of grievances as is our constitutional guarantee as citizens of this nation allows. Should proceed to asking this county or this state to determine by vote: IF WE THE PEOPLE DESIRE OR DEMAND, an accounting from our employees, acting within the law on our behalf. Whether WE THE PEOPLE DESIRE OR DEMAND, “Change will be made”.

Redress is the focus of this preparation to trial.
Therefore the question is more definably stated as: IN THIS DEMOCRACY, guaranteeing us a government of and by the people themselves/ has it become necessary to understand exactly how we have entered into this state of emergency, in so many area’s of life as a nation/ and has it become necessary to establish, or consider a new set of rules as the people themselves shall desire to make within the construction requirements of the constitution, and by the people’s vote as the law provides.

Should the jury answer yes to the issues of redress/ the door opens to this courtroom, and all who desire to participate in the procedural recognition of what is true, or what is not true/ what is a threat, or what is not a threat/ what is justice & fair play, as understood by equality between citizens; or not/ and what is our future, as best we can understand it, given the reality of this day: as is necessary to protect the children, the nation, and this earth. These are definitions that exist within the state/ and by state vote, should the county declare this is necessary: we the state of IL shall ask the nation of WE THE PEOPLE, if they feel it is necessary that the federal government must do the same.
The jury decides by random selection of jurists/ all who come at a set time and date/ as publicized in local media: by lottery. As there are none, who can claim “untouched” by this case.

THIS JURY DECIDES: IF THIS COURT THROUGH THE PROCESS OF THIS CASE, SHALL, OR SHALL NOT ASK THE COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF REDRESS ACCORDING TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT SHALL OCCUR. If they say yes, then the money shall be spent/ the advertizing shall be paid for by this court or state if the answer is yes. And the people registered within this county shall decide if we will ask this state. The people by vote of this state, if yes/ shall then automatically declare: the nation itself has been asked to accept this demand or by individual state give their own vote as an independent people joined as a nation. Majority rules.

As to the composition of this trial in terms of preparation for redress: neither I, can represent the people as a single citizen/ NOR can the defendant represent an entire industry, for the state or nation: unless chosen to do so by the people involved (state or nation). That must also appear for vote/ with alternates allowed. Lawyers for the people must be provided, and paid for by the state or nation. If the answer is yes. But the elected plaintiff for the people shall determine who those lawyers will be/ specifically given the right to hire or fire as he or she sees fit.

As to the immediate trial that extends to this initial jury decision: the reality is, while developed on the crisis in financial healthcare/ the reality of threats and the need for accounting and the determination of a future that will survive or not as society has designed in this day MUST be determined. But for the sake of this trial, the foundation of merit for going to trial begins and ends with the arguments that decide healthcare needs structural change or not. The jury can decide for itself, the presentation of threats that will adjoin this decision for healthcare. But no verbal arguments shall be given by either side. REDRESS is about OUR NEEDS as a nation or state; therefore every true threat belongs as a participation in this case. Should the jury decide for every other threat but healthcare/ then they may ask of this county for redress in these matters; and healthcare is exempt. Even so; this case, this reality of redress as designated by this case is about the financial reality of healthcare, and whether WE THE PEOPLE, demand and desire our own say in what is or is not right/ fair/ and legitimate in that matter.

There are NO healthcare issues beyond “the money”/ but there is every right to demand or establish an accountability regarding that money, and what is or is not an acceptable financial charge/ what is or is not an acceptable method of doing business/ what is or is not a time to die, for the sake of the others/ what is or is not, our right to be informed about all aspects of hospital and doctor: not just blank “take it or leave it”, but information/ what is our right with regard to accuracy in diagnosis/ who decides if a doctor will be trained or allowed into medical school/ the punishment for failing to train adequate doctors/ what is the maximum amount of money that can be spent on an individual, or by an individual, or taken from an individual/ what is fair or not fair to every veteran/ advertizing, particularly by the pharmacy industry/ patents and who owns the medicine created/ and whatever other information as is decided, by vote must be addressed by WE THE PEOPLE for the sake of our nation. An opportunity for the people to address this issue and select for themselves the questions and terms of redress court: shall appear, once the people of this state have chosen for themselves.

This defense has the opportunity to present whatever it desires within these questions/ or simply say nothing at all, as to redress; and simply let the jury decide. The judge, has the right to obey the law, and establish that law within the decision of this jury; either for or against redress by vote of the people.