In Federal Court
For the central district of the State of IL

dated 3/9/10

JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR
VS
STATE OF IL
USA et al.

THE CONSPIRACY OF FRAUD AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THIS UNITED STATES, & the STATE OF IL,   PROVEN BY:   obstruction and the intent of the court throughout its levels both state of IL and nation, to destroy the law, by a monopoly over first amendment redress of grievances.
 For the single purpose, to thwart:  A LEGAL RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE, the law, as their legal right to redress of grievances.  Whose function is:   DISPLAYING OUR OWNERSHIP of this nation, THE ULTIMATE FORM OF OUR AUTHORITY, as we the people.
Proving:    That,  WE THE PEOPLE, shall decide, interrogate, investigate, and examine/ and receive accountability from government employees;   as we see fit!   Under the constitutional terms called OWNER, of this nation called the United States of America.

The functional parameter of this lawsuit, presented in this federal court is: a state court judge has declared, in case 09-LM 1414   a case involving redress of grievances for the people.  Quote “...plaintiffs complaint is at once prolix (filled with unnecessary language or facts) and neological (the use of words or intent coined by a psychotic).  Indeed, with due respect to plaintiff, the complaint is simply incomprehensible from a legal standpoint.”   This judge continues his lies, by rewriting my words regarding service rendered/ rebuilds my complaint to serve his needs/ attempts to suggest it is not within his authority to allow a jury to call for a county vote as to whether “we this people”/ should ask the others for REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES as a nation.   It is clear, he will not be deterred from this intended escape of the law.  The assertion of the judge makes it boldly clear: that no amount of refiling shall make a difference/ the judge refuses to be specific or use the law in his decision; but merely complains “he don’t like the words”.  Rather “the use of, bastard’s in the court” an illinois law 735 ILCS 5/2-603 is offered as the substance allowing him to dismiss the constitutional rights of redress of grievances/ a first amendment demand upon the court. Proving, by case management as filed by the plaintiff:   it don’t matter what will be provided/ this judge demands:   THIS FIRST AMENDMENT REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES SHALL NOT STAND.       Which brings the call of traitor within this courtroom.  Because plain, concise, and clear are provable in a public venue that would include school age children over the age of 12.     The case is plain and simple; we the people deserve our say, in healthcare, in all matters of threat as we decide:    in court, with accountability over, and investigation of, our employees.  As the law allows by redress of grievances/ our first amendment right.    WE ARE THE OWNERS, NOT YOU.

Case management requires: that this judge be held accountable for his words!  That his assertion CANNOT understand, be held up to review; by demanding as a judge whose entire job it is, to be able to comprehend the words of another:   shall require him to admit and defend.    WHAT DO YOU UNDERSTAND!   Because if indeed he is unable to comprehend what he states to be “plaintiff is intelligent and has command of English”.  Then he cannot be a judge, because he fails the primary test of a judge: either in comprehension/ or in truth!  If he cannot comprehend, then his ability as a judge/ his job is compromised and he fails the people.  If instead he proves an outright LIAR, then he fails the law, the people, and this nation as a representative/ and must be evicted, held to the consequences of perjury; and pursued for the criminal actions of stealing from me my/ our GUARANTEED RIGHTS, as a nation.  And my guaranteed right by the law of DUE PROCESS.

Redress of grievances is not a game/ it is our truth as a democracy; wherein the people have their own say in times of crisis.   NOT a vote for you to vote for me, or me to vote for you/ INSTEAD a vote on the major issues that we have decided for ourselves to control and decide as to what the law shall be in this United States of America.   If that is what we so choose with regard to redress and our right as owners of this land.      NOT dismissed by conceptions of “rulers and slaves”/ but a free people, who own the right to their decision as a nation, on the laws and their employees.  Because it is OUR NATION, not yours, as “the employee”: that failure to provide our first amendment right of redress:    would signify theft of a nation, our ownership, our right to decide;   called Democracy.

Authority means, quote:   “The permission or power delegated to another” .  We then ask, WHO has the ultimate right of decision for this nation: the court/ the government employee/ we the people/ or constitutional law & the intent for democracy: (governing the nation by our individual vote)? 
The CORRECT ANSWER IS: that the constitutional law and intent for true democracy DOES HAVE THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY, to decide for this nation as we the people under law.  That law, to prove democracy and ownership for, we the people: is the first amendment redress of grievances.  The petition started in the lower State of IL case 09LM1414, champaign county court, Urbana IL judge Chase Leonhard IS THE FUNCTIONING REALITY:    Of a true and real establishment of that very law called first amendment redress of grievances/ by petitioning the people through the court, to come together by decision; and accept the task of determining what is or is not in the best interest of this nation by direct vote of the people themselves. The fact that we are in national crisis is NOT in dispute/ therefore the time for this law is now.

Judge Leonhard uses his authority to sit on this bench, over this trial in the malicious abuse of DUE PROCESS, with the clear intent to control access in this court & to the preliminary legal petition needed:   for WE THE PEOPLE, to have our say. At a time when there can be absolutely NO ROOM for doubt, that an accounting of our government employees must be demanded, created, and governed by a vote for OURSELVES, an acceptance of the responsibility required to save ourselves from worse.  On the issues that have plagued/ do plague/ or will plague this nation, as we decide.  Those threats, causing crisis across this land, and are clearly beyond our employees, ability to solve.  This is our nation/ this is our state/ this is OUR LIVES/ and this is OUR RIGHT BY LAW, according to the first amendment of the United States of America.
Let me be clear: that the judge used determinations which are wholly and completely inconsistent with the facts.  Asserting deductions or assumptions which are an absolute abuse of his discretion, and the standards common or necessary to a courtroom of law, wherein justice “the marriage of law and fair play through equal treatment” lives.  The arbitrary assertion, “that this is his courtroom”/ IS ABSOLUTELY TRAITOROUS to this nation:   AS IT BELONGS, TO WE THE PEOPLE! No judge owns a courtroom, it is OURS!  The challenge is made, in this courtroom, to declare otherwise, and prove it.   Therefore the term liar, when the intent is to withhold a guaranteed right of the American citizen, and we the people; is held up to view.  It is OUR LAW, thereby it is our right/ and no judge is authorized to withhold the law.  This was not a capricious act/ as this judge was given twice,  the full range of exactly what would be expected of him.  Creating a full & equal opportunity to change his mind/ by obeying the law, and his duty.  He has declined, producing the means to describe his decision as completely UNFAIR, and without legal bounds.  That means in true legal terms:   HE HAS stepped outside his robe/ his authority as a judge/ and comes under the terms of CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. 

The clear and literal reality, of a man whose determination and position is:   to STEAL FROM ME, by right to guaranteed legal process/ TO CHEAT ME from the guarantees and authority of law and nation/ and TO LIE to me, with regard to what is fundamentally and functionally LEGAL DUE PROCESS in this state and nation.   These rights for both me and this nation, that cannot be underestimated in value. He has attacked!  Particularly in this day, & at this time, when the process of determining whether or not:   A LONG LIST OF THREATS MADE AGAINST THIS NATION, STATE AND WORLD, will grant our future to survive; or not.  Fundamentally questioning whether we shall starve, or thirst, or face horrendous consequences or whatever the cost of current realities shall be.  It is our right to understand, it is our right to accept the duty of knowledge and adhere to the preservation of our lives, our nation, our world, and the children, by assessing our reality and truth, through accountability and the examination of evidence.  AND OUR OWN DECISION BY VOTE, as a nation.  It is our right to decide these things for ourselves/ it is a traitor that demands, “we shall not have this law”. 
This judge stands against WE THE PEOPLE, and rules within the terms of tyrant;   such that we should just die/ because he wishes to pretend “god over us”.
There ARE penalties for that, in this nation.  A criminal trial discovering what is it worth:   to destroy our law, and terrorize our people with treason, leaving them open to destruction.

THIS COURT:   is instructed to obey the constitutional first amendment law, and establish trial 09LM1414 as the guarantees of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA demand.  Allowing the jury to have their say, and if yes then the county and state.  Their decision is:  to ask the county/ by vote the county asks the state/ and by vote the state asks the nation as a whole: if we the people, shall demand our inherent right of redress by the first amendment.  THESE ARE THE WAYS OF A LEGAL PETITION in first amendment redress of grievances/ and there is no law, or precedent or cause to suggest otherwise!   It is not a request, it is the law.  This is a petition of law, the working parameter of ownership in democracy, as we the people.

THIS COURT:   is instructed to establish, whether collusion in the champaign county courthouse existed, to deny to this nation:   “WE THE PEOPLE”:    OUR GUARANTEED RIGHTS, AND FIRST AMENDMENT LAW.  Treason, is a serious charge.

THIS COURT: IS REQUIRED to assemble and create a review of all cases presented throughout the various levels of the judiciary in this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;   by the litigant    JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR (JAMES F. OSTERBUR) wherein an issue of redress of grievances was created;   and establish whether there is justice in the court.   Or if THERE IS A PATTERN in the courthouses of america, whereby the conspiracy of the court to deny to this people, in this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;   the truth of who we are, as a democracy.  Either determined by the law and the people’s right to justice/ or corruption in the court.  In truth, that pattern has already been established in the simple fact:   not one single trial, or beginning of trial can be found establishing this first amendment legal right. In the history of this nation/ it is without doubt      “someone asked, demanded”.

The question then is:   Who is the power of this land, the people or the employee?  The court is accused of: taking  our GUARANTEED RIGHTS away, with endless excuses/ avoiding fair play and justice, by playing games instead of working for life.  The question to the court is:    WHAT IS “GOOD BEHAVIOR/ because the constitution does NOT say any behavior will do”! In the legal setting of a courtroom where lives and property are at stake, is there not a demand for FAIR PLAY?  Because without good behavior DUE PROCESS is merely a game.  The authority of ownership, the reality of possession, the purpose of the law, and the demand for democracy are all:     property of the people.  OUR RIGHTS, not yours.  Our desire for justice/ YOUR DUTY.  Our democracy/ your job.   Our authority over this nation/ your sworn oath to protect. Fails without good behavior/ and this case is determined to define and create exactly what that good behavior is, or is not.

The finding in case 09LM1414  being:    if the removal of due process by malicious abuse in the judiciary, is allowed.  Then does that not cause to say:   not only is this reckless disregard for the law or truth, but an UNDUE authority, not governed by judicial immunity.   The question then: is it a traitorous act, when the foundations of a nation were deliberately undermined?   The removal of a first amendment law and its purpose in allowing the people to protect themselves, from their own employees: IS NOT an authority given the court/ in any level or venue.  It is an authority given to the people, over their nation.

   The courts job is to support the law, and protect the people, by adhering to constitutional demands. THE DAMAGE OF THAT TREASON, failing to defend the securities and purposes provided by constitutional demand on our employees.   BEING CLEARLY VIEWED TODAY!  In the reality of very many lives in crisis, with more to come. A nation buried in debt, failure, and threats!  A citizen and thereby a nation:   being turned away, from our legal right to intervene as owners should we so declare.   This case 09LM1414,  through the presentation of a petition (its procedural votes as have been described) in court, by which we the people demand to be heard is a literal right by law, of the people intended to protect themselves.  Not a game/ a recognition in failure; and the assertion WE MUST, because our employees cannot.

The court is reminded: that justice is its “mission in life”/ therefore a review of all cases, to determine and distinguish what is or was functionally       FAIR PLAY, EQUAL OR BALANCED, AND HONEST JUSTICE :  as the people themselves would agree.  Did the court in past cases “DO their job correctly, or with honest intent for justice”. Did they succeed in pressing for fair play, equal rights, democracy, or the assertion “we need assistance within the law that protects us all”?   Do the cases represented in fact, establish a court system either OBEYING THE LAW, or failing the people. Or does it produce a court system controlled for the benefit of the lawyers/ by removing any and all possibility of honest representation by the public.  That answer is already provided, by the exorbitant prices charged as “attorney fees”.   A review of many more cases should follow, when it is determined:   the court is failing this USA, because it protects the power, the pride, and the money instead of the people.  IT controls the people/ rather than controlling power over the people, as is its job.  The entire constitution, the bill of rights, and the declaration of independence is about controlling those who would choose,  power over the people.  The court is accused:   in opposition to that fact/ thereby fundamentally and criminally in confrontation with WE THE PEOPLE, of this United States of America.
The investigation of cases is necessary, and a part of this trial, because corruption and conspiracy in the courthouse IS A VERY SERIOUS MATTER to every nation.  The reality of asserting the path of a single individual, without the benefit of a legal education, throughout the process;   DOES represent the reality of courtroom covenants, either kept or abandoned, in this USA.  Therefore they are to be construed liberally, as the procedural instructions to:  every judge, in the matter of a pro se litigant is intended to be  These trials (etc) establish a truth about the court, and its judges, in this state of IL/ USA; to their relationship with power over the people.  That is literal and clear.
One could say:  Is the court not grateful for their “day in the sunlight”?  Do you not wish “the accolades” worthy of a people doing their duty? Then surely you agree;    What a good thing.  “Let the court be praised/ or corrected, because it is necessary”.  Its your job, “to be open, and fair”, is it not.  Prove your reality, as the providers of our legal reality:    IS GOOD BEHAVIOR!

THE COURT IS REMINDED: what the people intend to hear:    is for JUSTICE, FAIR PLAY, EQUALITY, AND EQUITY regarding every decision!    THAT is what we want/ and that is what we DO pay you for!  Its your job.

Therefore the games of the court, including the incidentals of procedure/ the assertion or assumption of precedent/ the laws inferior to the US CONSTITUTION/ or the intent of process that is NOT in submission to OUR DECLARED RIGHTS OR REALITY as described by the preamble of our government:   this constitution of the United States of America!    Are not allowed!

INSTEAD our constitution, the declaration of independence, and the bill of rights: IS OUR GOVERNMENT!  IS to be recognized as our government!  Because these bind us all together as one nation, in agreement: by the terms ACCEPTED as WE THE PEOPLE.   The descriptions: that this is who we shall be together!   It is the words accepted,  that governments are born from.   It is the guarantees of freedom, justice, and equality;   that give us the desire to fight and die for this nation.   In democracy there are no rulers: NO temporary employee, who promises, propagates, steals, or lies/ that we are required to die for.  We fight for ourselves, because it is OUR NATION!

  Therefore the terms of “our government”/ and its written instruction;  Shall rule this process and this trial.  WITHIN the critical construction, that democracy means WE THE PEOPLE/ not you the employee.  WITHIN the simple truth: there is NO supremacy in this nation:   not for the citizen/ not for the judge/ not for the president, no one.  WE ARE EQUALS, apart from you have sworn:    to uphold the law, by defending the people, THE LAW, and the constitution/ or face penalties.

Because the possibility exists
The people are reminded: behind closed doors, the court does whatever it pleases, making up any situation it desires, and demanding adherence to whatever it says.  Because after all, “who, can say or prove different”!  I bring no weapons/ I bring no cause for a conviction against me in any conceivable way.  I will be walking for peace and the purpose of law; and nothing will change that.  Regardless of what you may or may not hear.  Should I die, this is a national issue called redress by the first amendment; and can be carried on by those who admit too/ and describe actions that are concurrent with the term, and basis of purpose called:   “Life first”, for this world!

The people are allowed:   having given you the basis, and keys of REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.  The reality of our employees/ NOT our “government”.
Should you find it necessary to go on for yourselves: let there be thousands of filings across this nation.  Keep it simple!  Demand a redress trial, within the reality of accounting and examination of the facts:    Because of this crisis, this threat, this need, or whatever it is that you believe must be addressed.  Let the court respond/ and the people decide accordingly.   BUT as this case is already conceived for that purpose;   “Give it, its chance to succeed first”.  It does no one good, to create confusion.  The above test is about proving to the court:    WE WILL, HAVE OUR LAW!
YOU may use the chat room provided www.justtalking3.info  for that purpose, establishing the results and organizing as necessary.  Some contributions may be necessary due to the potential volume of data distribution. Unless otherwise instructed, by you;  any contribution could also be used for the purpose of this trial, and/ or advertizing said trial across the nation.
___________________________________________________

The list of those cases involving this plaintiff;   is found on the following web sites; and shall constitute a valid presentation; as various courts in hiding their crimes;   threw some of  the case files away.

www.justtalking3.info   09LM1414 Champaign county court
This case involving the relationship between medicine and citizen, WAS expanded to include:   as defined by money and health issues between the citizen and the healthcare industry.  Redress to resolve, was demanded.
The judge falsified his decision with fraud; and dismissed.
The conclusion of that court, being in short: “...cases such as these are not uncommon. They often present a blinding blizzard of chaff...   ..this ruling only addresses the present form of plaintiff’s complaint......the court does not understand the plaintiff’s claims,..”    
My response PROVE IT WITH LAW!  Be specific about “what you don’t understand”.
 The reality: even this judge admits, “the court commonly shits on the citizen”, and cares nothing, for the law or justice or right. 

www.justtalking2.info    US supreme court 08-133  
A case: demanding the US SUPREME COURT must answer the question,   will you obey the first amendment redress of grievances law?  Having been docketed (all procedural requirements met)  and paid for:     the ruling of a judge is required.
the circuit clerk instead responds:   case dismissed.

My response: this is anarchy and treason because it is the law..., and the law does not allow for “just cause I don’t want too”!  These are NOT our rulers!  They are OUR employees!

www.justtalking.info  Are several more cases

the trial abstract of cases found at www.trialforlife.info/ wherein the first assembly of:     OUR first amendment redress of grievances RIGHTS,  took place.  Contain several more/ including issues with city.  IF the links are not working in this file, the filings are listed as items as you go down the page.