Therein, because it is a courtroom that denies me/ the IL policing agencies that refuse me:   to the point of complete disrespect for the courtroom/ thereby its law.    BECAUSE the clear and irrefutable evidence of a pattern of behavior and denial exist, without the slightest degree of obedience to this law called redress year after year:   by the court/ as it exists from least to the US SUPREME COURT, is hereby proven true.  Is that too little, for the FBI to investigate?  DO they not investigate “wikileaks”/ a reality of little or no damage to the nation itself:   merely the arrogant talking.  Why did they NOT investigate those people who published “how to make your own atomic bomb”?  The answer, because it is a game of power and pride; “we can make you”/ and they don’t want to discuss “an atomic bomb”; because the public could make demands, and  “Making them;  ruin their game”.
What then is more important, “the life or death of democracy itself/ as is this case in terms of constitutional law.  We cannot have employees who believe they are rulers/ it is the end of democracy.  Or some worthless chatter, as is wikileaks;  that should have been public in the first place.  Answer the question.  Remembering if you defend “wikileaks, as too important to dismiss”/ THEN WHAT MUST YOU DO, for this constitution, and this people called the United States of America, and this state called Illinois?  The harm and destruction of stealing our law from us/ OUR GUARANTEED RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP AS A NATION, called democracy:    Cannot be underestimated.     Is that not cause for the FBI to investigate?

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, is stated to be:  that critical link between protection of the public/ protection of our guaranteed rights as citizens in this United States.  The FBI,  is called to declare:    Owned by the people/ or pawns of those who are in rebellion against us:   our employed leaders, our judiciary,  who are attempting and have made themselves rulers, by stripping us of our law.  Does the constitution rule, or does it not!

1.       WHETHER IT IS TREASON, TO REFUSE OR DESTROY THE GUARANTEED LEGAL RIGHTS OWED TO   “WE THE PEOPLE” & ME!  In any courtroom of this state or nation, does constitutional law rule or not!   AS IS REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES BOTH STATE AND NATION.
This,  Is a question the FBI can answer/ IN REDRESS TRIAL.
We are owed that answer, as WE THE PEOPLE.

Upon that foundation, THE LAW, THAT GOVERNS LIFE, IN AMERICA.     The evidence REQUIRED of the FBI is  then to gather, & provide the means to try our employees: for the failure to do their job, to keep their oath to this people: to prove or disprove constitutional law does exist.  The rebellion against us as a state called ILLINOIS, with its own constitutional demand for redress to be provided to this people:    exists to be tried,  as well.

As redress of grievances:   opening the door to DEMOCRACY, which means the authority and ownership of the people, by their own law, their own decision under constitutional law:     becomes true.   We the people, will  then decide, what punishment or change shall come!   Our nation, means our decision!

 

The list of threats associated with this state trial 10 MR 766 is long and severe, in the cause and consequence of its reality.  Each threat is a distinct reality in truth, that can and will cause extinction/ lead to war/ creates the death of a planet, or mutilates its nature.  The day for arrogance and the disease of idol worship, and images of pretending to be gods as is the university; is over.  PROOF IS REQUIRED, that we will NOT DIE, due to their gambling.  The guarantee of this government called the USA is that religion shall not govern us.  The reality however is:   the university has become your religion/ and taken over government!  Religion means:   “Believe whatever we say/ question nothing, just do what you are told:   because we are like gods, we know what we are doing”!  That is discarded, in its entirety.  PROVE THESE THREATS DO NOT EXIST:    Because the damage they will cause is the end of life.    Is that too little, for the FBI?    Prove the possibility does not exist!  Prove you are not religious zealots, blindly following “pigs (i want everything)  and whores (only the money matters to me)”.       I DEMAND THE EVIDENCE/ THE PROOF, these fools shall not destroy our lives, our nation, our democracy, or our future.   IS THAT too small for the FBI.   Show me my error, prove the description of a  single threat is errant, or blind, or without cause to be concerned.  Prove I have NO right of protection from this the government employees hired to do that very job.

 

PROVE, AS IS THE BEGINNING BELOW:    the need to continue on in redress as a people:   to understand and resolve to rebuild the democracy we share, is not real.  It is our law/ GIVE IT BACK!  It is THE LAW, we cannot be denied.             IS IT NOT the job of the FBI to enforce the law!  Our state policing agencies for this area REFUSE!   WHAT IS YOUR DECISION.

2.    Whether, THERE IS NO IMMUNITY , from  DENYING THE LAW! Thereby destroying the rights, authority, and ownership  of the people.

3.       THERE ARE PENALTIES IN “CURSING THE OATH OF OFFICE”, TAKEN in assurance:  TO prove, I, the employee:  will  UPHOLD THE PEOPLES      CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!   As a judge or policing agent.    So that none may assume the role of ruler/ and all must obey the law equally!

4.   Whether DUE PROCESS is upheld, when the law called redress of grievances,    is not.

5.   According to article 3 of the US constitution:  Whether judicial immunity is NOT limited by “good behavior”.

6.  According to article 3 of the US constitution:   in this fight between a citizen:     fighting for redress according to the IL constitution;   and the policing agencies of his state called IL, who refuse their duty.    And this federal government declared to rule over the states, and make them obey constitutional mandates.    What is your duty.   Is it not the duty of the department of justice to investigate?   Oh wait:   it is that department of justice that comes under the law/ the refuses to obey the law called redress.  It is the attorney general implicated, along with the president in US SUPREME COURT 08-1339.   DID THEY NOT have the power to intervene?    Who then is left, apart from the FBI?   Who then determines what is fair, legal, and right according to constitutional demand:   IF NOT THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES.  When it is the court system itself, that is found in contempt, disgrace, and disrespect for this government called democracy.  That right, that duty and obligation to protect ourselves, is dependent upon the evidence being gathered, and presented WITH TRUTH.  So that all can see, and decide.
Not propaganda as is,  so damned & prevalent in this day: but trial, with open doors, so that all can see.

7.   Whether the courts, have failed us/ thereby proving a need “to clean house”.   Is our decision!    BUT TO get to that moment of proven democracy: we must have the truth, as described by evidence in a courtroom called trial.  That is the job of the FBI, in this situation/ because there are no others.

 The defendants       SECTION 1

JURISDICTION IS ALLOWED, under the constitution by its guarantee to all the people, that our laws shall be obeyed equally. That includes the judiciary.  As this is trial of the judiciary itself/ the policing agencies who refuse to enforce the law in this state of IL/ and the constitutional law both as state and nation called redress.  If the court desires to push this trial into the US SUPREME COURT it may/ but only under the rule, that allows immediate investigation and trial:   because the threats recognized herein CANNOT WAIT.
 The federal bureau of investigation is fundamental and clearly authorized to participate and define its role/ to investigate and defend this people/ to develop the critical foundations of evidence that are associated with treason:   without prejudice to position, pride, or power.
The deliberate rebellion against our constitutional laws, both state of IL and this nation.   By the courts, given  the reality of evidence supported strictly as those cases:    brought about by the plaintiff (or others).   Proves,  IT IS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR, that a conspiracy to deny this first amendment legal right exists.  Thereby the FBI is called to  INVESTIGATE AND PROVE, any other redress trial has occurred.  Because otherwise you have proven, it is a long held conspiracy by the judiciary/ and in particular the US SUPREME COURT, to deny us our rights. That collusion has formed is simple and plain. And that corruption exists throughout the judicial system is real.   Does this not “trickle down” from the US SUPREME COURT;    Is disgrace and the disease of power, as in case 08-1339/ not clear and apparent.  A fact that is in direct defiance, and open rebellion,   of our laws as a people and a democracy.

The FBI is warranted in this case:   DUE TO THAT FACT!  Because these charges are directed at the police of this state of IL, and its entire judiciary system/ and this US SUPREME COURT of this nation.  A case 08-1339;  that included the US ATTORNEY/ SOLICITOR GENERAL/ AND PRESIDENT OF THIS USA!  Substantiates the claim,     Who else then:   can investigate and prove it is either true, in a court of law/ the people are betrayed:   or not?  

 The FBI,  is the clear UNITED STATES agency in charge of these specific types of cases/ thereby it is a duty of that agency to investigate, examine, and decide if evidence of illegal activity exists.   They are required to bring that evidence before the court or more specifically BEFORE THIS PEOPLE:  for the VERY SPECIFIC PURPOSE, of proving that evidence, either good or bad.   As the law demands, and their position in government provides:    Regardless of position, title, or power, the law rules this nation.  Thereby, they are required to bring before the court;   TO THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES,   the truth!

 IN OTHER WORDS:   in this fight to obtain our lawful rights as WE THE PEOPLE,  we demand to see the truth and reality of our judiciary/ our government employees/ and our law realized for ourselves as redress.  We demand to see what the FBI uncovers in this case of courtroom defiance: the judiciary against,  our legal constitutional rights & law/ our legal demand as a people,   for DUE PROCESS under the law.
It cannot be the court itself who decides/ because it is the court throughout this entire USA system that is being charged with the crime: it is the policing agencies of this state of IL that are charged with complicity, after the fact.  Therefore only the people themselves can decide if these oaths were kept/ if these employees were fair,   WITH US!  In doing their job.

Or, did they WITHHOLD OUR GUARANTEED RIGHT called  REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES/ ACCORDING TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT, as provided by this nation to we the people.    As is  demanded for us, by the ILLINOIS constitution, for this people in this state as well, separate and real.   OUR LAW, is withheld,   FROM US!
The FBI is demanded to investigate/ to examine the evidence/ and present that evidence within the law called redress by establishing trial before the people:  so that the people will judge for themselves.  It is our nation, this is our state/ YOU are not rulers!
The FBI is  not directly entitled to:   make this judiciary,  obey the law.  But we the people are!   WE ARE, “the final authority”/ it is our nation, WE ARE THE OWNERS!

 

          Protecting our guaranteed constitutional rights: is a job required of all our employees.  Particularly the FBI, in situations wherein the court is called to give account of itself:   to our democracy!           THEREBY GRANTING TO US ALL,   as owners:     OUR DEMOCRACY alive by the foundation of its truth.  As it is written for our benefit to use;   as owners called WE THE PEOPLE here.   This recognition, Grants the truth:  We do not war/ die/ or get mutilated defending this nation for you, “the leaders/ or more correctly our employees”: you are not rulers of us. We fight for ourselves, because it is our nation/ our state called IL.
Because, WE ARE THE OWNERS HERE.   Anything less is treason, and tyranny, by the court, or its policing force.

Within this truth:    THE FBI HAS NO CHOICE, regardless of the court.   They are called to their duty, to defend this democracy/ this law/ this state/  and this people, including me.  NOT to pass judgment: but to create the evidence so that we the people shall.  Within knowledge/ truth/ understanding/ and hopefully wisdom.  This is our state.  This is our nation, and we do/ I do demand ownership rights, according to constitutional law.

YOU THE FBI: ARE TO INSURE, CREATE, & DEMAND:    Thereby providing to me, and to “WE THE PEOPLE” OF THIS STATE, AND THIS  AMERICA!     THAT THE COURTS, & all the employees who lead the people of  THIS LAND;    SHALL OBEY THE LAW, equally with us. 
 INCLUDING THIS REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES CLAUSE WITHIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THIS STATE CONSTITUTION:   AS WRITTEN AND INTENDED BY THE PEOPLE WHO GAVE US THIS GOVERNMENT CALLED DEMOCRACY.  Defined by the two other founding documents that created this nation: the bill of rights, & the declaration of independence as well!   Or more simply, “only the law can rule us”/ there are no rulers of the people!  ONLY the law.    The intent of that law is made clear through the foundation documents that built this nation.  Nothing less/ certainly NOT, a few employees shall take that away.

THAT IS MY DEMAND; the court shall do its duty, to the people!  The evidence that it is necessary to bring in the FBI:   “the policing agency MOST defined and determined to be” the examiner of last resort in terms of governmental employees.   Is proven and supported by the US attorney/ bringing these cases to light. PROVING the evidence of denial himself.

 

2.                            There is a demand for protection for the people

THE FOUNDATION OF PROTECTION:   as is consistent with the needs of this people and their own courtrooms/ is NOT limited to one singular law.  Which establishes the second part of this foundation/ is this NEED TO PARTICIPATE as we the people;   before everything is lost.

When people are gambling with our lives, with  THE MEANS TO DESTROY US!   THAT IS OUR BUSINESS/ that is our need to be protected from those terrorists who do intend us harm.  As is clearly defined by the outline of threats, so clearly discarded by defendants in trial 10 MR 766.   The policing agencies and the courtrooms of this state of ILLINOIS in refusing/ thereby denying access to DUE PROCESS/ the duty to protect, the honor in sounding a necessary alarm.  Not only the right to protect myself, has been denied/ but the duty required of me to protect this state and nation as well.  They are free to prove me wrong!  They are NOT FREE, to deny my right to the protection of this my government through our employees. That too is rebellion/ desertion of duty by the police and the courts:   IRREGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU BELIEVE.  The evidence is required here to prove NO HARM shall exist.  Not blind  Religion, as is the belief “they know what they are doing”!   This is NOT allowed in a courtroom> truth decides, not belief: is that no so;   and that includes worshiping the universities.
When the reality is:    WE CAN DIE, an entire world lost/ BECAUSE OF THE MACHINES AND METHODS OF THEIR THEORIES BEING PROVEN WRONG!   Then they have moved beyond theory, freedom, or rights:   to threaten our lives, as terrorists.
None of the threats which bring about this lawsuit, or more specifically the demand upon OUR POLICING AGENCIES TO INVESTIGATE “terrorists”:   are trivial or small.  We have no option to repair, rebuild, or survive; just like any other bomb, only worse: when the university claims and theories are proven wrong.  Thereby THEY GAMBLE WITH ALL OUR LIVES!

 That is NOT within constitutional guidelines/ NOT within democratic principles/ NOT within the allowances of law.  Because any other who would threaten us in these ways would be imprisoned and condemned to death.  

I DO NOT say, “I am right and they are wrong in these threats”.  I DEMAND:    IF THEY ARE LITERALLY GAMBLING WITH MY LIFE/ MY NATURE/ MY FUTURE/ MY WORLD;    As   THEY UNDENIABLY  ARE!  Then under redress of grievances and the law of criminal intent:    I/ we demand no less than OUR DECISION to allow these threats/ these practices, or policies  to exist or not; for ourselves.  That is democracy.  If the majority say:   go ahead and gamble/ then it is our decision.  If the majority say:   NO MY LIFE IS TOO PRECIOUS TO GAMBLE WITH IN THESE WAYS!   Then these things must stop.  Any who refuse, have simply destroyed themselves; let the law assist.

The critical foundation of threat, against all life.  The absolute failure of the court to this date, in all categories:   PROVES that democracy is now in the hands of those  “Thieves/ swindlers/ terrorists/ and traitors”.  Who not only refuse to protect us, but endanger us all.
The court is not owned by the judge/ it is OUR PROPERTY, IT IS OUR LAW, IT IS OUR DEMOCRACY.   When the court proves to be a failure, and a fool:     IS THAT NOT the work of the FBI?   To support and defend WE THE PEOPLE, from those in open rebellion? Regardless where the evidence leads?
The conclusion of a bomb:   by any valid description/ is death.  Thereby it is always legitimate and legal to assert:   WE MUST FIND OUT, if people could die/ and stop this menace/ this threat, before it harms.  Before it is too late!   Is that not true?
In terms of threat:   the national ignition facility provides a clear point of fact that shall be used to initiate & determine if this case must go forward.
Their theory is:   we can contain a “few kilotons of nuclear explosion” by using 192 lasers!    Indeed they might:  But if even one laser fails/ there shall be a focused nuclear laser-like  beam    Powered,  not only the nuclear explosion/ but the power released from the lasers intended to contain it; thereby following it.  The damage that will cause is unquestionably horrific.     And the machine resides in a suburb of San Francisco.   Prove it is not so! 
The national ignition facility also describes a clear point of fact that is used to determine as a world, we cannot be wrong.  As“THEIR claim is: “the blasted
target/ explosion; will generate 500 trillion watts- 1000 times the electrical
generating capacity of this USA: quoted from techwatch page 13 popular
mechanics June 2008. As their name “ignition facility” implies: it is their intent to create fusion: the burning of atomic bonds: same as the sun.  That is a fact.  In this world of atomic bonds holding together everything:    This literal planet is “all fuel”. Thereby fusion a fire burning at 6-10 million degrees of heat/ with a probable rise in flame of miles:    is,  a fire we cannot control by any possible means.  The planet becomes “a lake of fire” as is the sun.
The experiment at CERN, whose stated purpose is to recreate the “big bang”;   the single most destructive event in the history of the universe.  Speaks for itself.  Utterly and without doubt completely INSANE.

The mutilation of nature itself:   because all of nature is either the control of energy, or the composition of DNA means.  THE CONSEQUENCES OF  these universities,   do crucify and mutilate our very lives by endless threats of complete disaster, and horrors:  which we CANNOT undo. It is BEYOND  INSANE.  It is deliberately,  playing god with life on earth:    without the abilities of an ant; in comparison. 
The endless worship of the religion that university has become:   “Believe in us/ DON’T question nothing” is an outright invasion of government, and has changed this nation, from a reliance on truth.  To the endless variation of fantasy, delusion, and greed so rampant today.  Throw it out/ or more distinctly as is the truth of these threats above: MAKE THEM PROVE, these gambles cannot destroy our lives.   MAKE THEM PROVE, we can survive.  Demand every threat shall be investigated, so that we do not die!         Life is not a game/ evolution is just a religion of fools; they have proven nothing.   Throw these religions out.
The massive threats we face from all sides:    Throughout the lawsuit filed, are not less than the possibility of our extermination from this world.  Prove it is not so.           is that too small, for the FBI to investigate?  They are not asked to prove.  They are required to present the evidence that either accepts:   this is gambling with our lives and our nation/ our nature, and our world.  Or it is not.  If it is gambling/ then in redress WE THE PEOPLE, have a right to decide/ rather than being forced to accept the consequences we can no longer control.  Democracy means:    We the people have rights!  No greater right exists, than to prove someone else cannot murder me.  You cannot gamble with my life intentionally without my consent.  THAT IS ILLEGAL!

The court refuses its job; “they are believers, using their religion to make decisions for the rest of us”/ DENYING FACTS AND EVIDENCE, for the sake of their religion called “university”.
Our lives are being  gambled with based upon the theories (guesses) of those who believe they are like gods, compared to us.  Terrorists instead, because as is proven by the above experiments:   life or even this earth;   this entire world can be lost.   NOTHING IS PROVEN, by the word theory.  It is a guess, that is the meaning of that word.  A gamble with our lives, your life too!   Do you care, IF THEY ARE WRONG?  There is no going back, life or death for a world:   is that a risk you are willing to take for yourself?  That is the gamble, being taken for you, even today.  They will only be wrong ONCE.  After that, it is over/ as is true of every terrorist action;   too late, is goodbye forever.

 The state of IL policing agencies for this area/ REFUSE to do their job in protecting the people.  They are in collusion with the religion of university as well, “believers”!    By requiring  proof:    WITH EVIDENCE IN COURT/ SO AS TO PROVIDE others with,  “THE ALTERNATE VIEW”:   in a courtroom that punishes intention liars severely.         WE ALL attain the right of our decision, as a nation or world.  Thereby GIVING US THE RIGHT, and the reality:   that we the people are the owners of this decision. 
That these threats “do, or do not   exist” is for us all to decide/ IT IS OUR LIFE, OUR FUTURE, OUR EVERYTHING..   Or more directly the truth and its consequence:   that we shall have a say: if this gamble with our lives, our everything shall or shall not occur. Is democracy!0
 Therefore beyond the reality of this attack on us all/ as a nation and a world.  With consequences beyond true comprehension.  It is our legal right to have a say, demanding the opportunity to decide:   if the religion “university” shall or shall not, gamble with our everything.  With life or death for a world, its nature, or its future.
  THE NEED FOR INTERVENTION:   THE DEMAND FOR INFORMATION:   THE PROOF OF SURVIVAL AND A FUTURE for ourselves or the children or life on earth,   IS,    OUR DECISION to make,  AS A NATION called we the people.   To allow/ or disallow;    As is  fundamental to this case:    Is a legal right called democracy.  But without an education in reality and its truth, no clear decision can be made.  Thereby we do understand the need for investigators, the demand for adequate presentation, and the reality of punishment to any and all liars in a courtroom of law.  To establish truth, by the evidence alone.

I give no one the right to intentionally  gamble with my life, my future, or my world!    DO YOU!      Whosoever,  denies me that right/ denies THE VERY FOUNDATION OF THIS NATION.     That we the people have legally guaranteed  rights.   Prove it is not so!   
    They cannot/ therefore WE CANNOT BE WRONG, or we are dead:    BECAUSE OF THESE VERY THINGS.     The proof of reality, the risk to life, the reality of a future in jeopardy:   are all  required for our decision.    Who better than the FBI/ when the courts, and lesser policing organizations, have declared the constitution both state and nation as “invalid”/    Thereby, said no!  Assembling the statement:  “They have money to protect”/ let the people be damned.   Is that legal?

PROVE:   that theory is not speculation and the intent to use MY WORLD/ MY FUTURE/  AND MY LIFE:   TO GAMBLE WITH,   for their own purposes.  I care nothing if they kill themselves/ it is their due.   I care without end, that their failures kill this world.  That is a legal consequence, therefore a demand within the legal system of criminal association: to prove what this “bomb” can do.  Our right to be informed PRIOR TO THE FACT OF DEATH:  As does the truth called criminal law imply/ is absolute.   Regardless of fools who work within the court system of this america.   WE CANNOT be wrong.   Therefore,  WE DESERVE OUR DECISION, as the voice and truth of our democracy.
Or more simply this can only go on:   IF WE the people;   SAY IT CAN, BY VOTE.  As would be consistent with redress of grievances/ and the purpose or intent of democracy.

                 Reply to:      Defendants II

The life or death of this nation.  The life or death of not less than the people who reside in San Francisco.  The life or death of every child.  The life or death of all that is nature.  The life or death of resources which thereby exterminate us.  The life or death of chains in life/ environments/ pollinators/ water/ oceans/ and everything else that is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY FOR OUR SURVIVAL,                                                 IS NOT A GAME!   Not for a single person alive.
 THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION HAS thereby:   BEEN ESTABLISHED.  No excuse exists!

THERE IS NO SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR DISOBEYING THE LAW.  THERE IS NO SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR allowing our lives to be THREATENED.    OUR LIVES, OUR FUTURE, EVERY CHILD;  OR OUR WORLD threatened , WITH EXTINCTION DUE TO:   THESE THREATS, which do establish YOUR GAMBLING as leaders.  The worship of university, a religion hidden.  There is no immunity from protecting this democracy.  There is no immunity from protecting the state of IL in its democracy.  There is no immunity from protecting life on earth.  There is no immunity from disavowing your oath of office.  There is no immunity from the law, or this democracy of the people as employees/ because you are NOT rulers.   WE OWN the nation/ it is our authority that decides what is our truth.  

It is a duty of this court/ this nation/ these policing agencies/ and every aspect of this government called we the people to demand:   THE FOUNDATIONS NECESSARY FOR OUR SURVIVAL,         CANNOT BE TAMPERED WITH!    THAT IS TREASON, the traitorous act of fools.  It is a criminal conspiracy, to remove this protection from us, as a people.

The standard:  set for governmental intervention and its every decision is regulated and controlled by the constitution itself.  Those words are most distinct in the preamble which governs the intent, or more correctly THE STANDARD, to which our employees shall strive for the sake of this people.
Those words are:   “We the people of this United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
 These words,  with the laws inherent as our guaranteed rights, preform the action and authority of government.  The right and responsibility of each decision for this union of “we the people”. With oaths required by the leaders to prove IF YOU DO NOT obey our laws, punishments  will come. The humanity employed, are expected to obey.  DEMOCRACY, means: ruled by law, not by people; owned by ourselves!

GIVEN THAT STANDARD,   when subjected to the consequence of so many threats that can exterminate this entire nation and world/ listed in the initiating trial 10 MR 766.   THREATS which do include consequences for,  This state of IL:   there is no allowance of immunity.  The demand, WE DON’T have to care,  is refused.  YOU DO, have to care and investigate for the people/ presenting real and accurate evidence; in a framework that allows for cross examination:     according to the constitution of both state and nation.  Through redress.
   We have a legal right, to decide for ourselves:   IF YOU will risk OUR EVERYTHING.  THESE ARE CHOICES/ THIS IS DEMOCRACY, not tyranny or a dictatorship;   WE DECIDE, not you.  Freedom does not accept:   YOU MAY TRY, “to murder us, or steal our everything”.

Our binding guarantee with this state and this nation is:   YOU SHALL DO ME NO HARM!  That is your basic job as employees of our government.  That is the foundation of our payment in taxes and obedience to the law;  and the allowance for authority of a courtroom, or policing agency, as the freedom and protections of law,   applied to us all.   YOU DENY THAT, when gambling or allowing such threats as these to exist.   When the facts, that clearly can be proven:  ESTABLISH,   Failure means we won’t survive/ our nature will be extinguished/ and nothing but death will be left.  All because of these few/ this religion called university.  YOU, our employees;    have NO authority to allow these things, our lives to be gambled with/ or threats to be discarded by your disgrace and disrespect for life.
That means you have criminally trespassed onto our lives, our democracy.  It is,  An act of treason.
My demand again is NOT to decide for this nation/ as that is not democracy!  MY DEMAND IS FOR REDRESS BOTH STATE AND NATION, so that the people shall decide for themselves.  IT IS THEIR RIGHT!  The court refuses that right.  The FBI HAS BEEN NOTIFIED of its duty to “gather the criminals” and bring them to trial.  Because the law has been broken!   The FBI HAS BEEN NOTIFIED of its duty to protect and defend this nation, and this state.  Under constitutional law.  It is your job!
The incessant lying/ the clear attempts to steal my constitutional rights from me/ the swindle that is “denial of understanding, the assertions of vague or ambiguous” ARE LIES, in a courtroom of law.  WHAT IS THE PENALTY?   Who shall enforce, when the court does not/ when the court and its agents are the responsible party.  Would I not be imprisoned for the same: WHERE IS my equality?  Should I lie so frivolously and without fear from the court?  Indeed I would be imprisoned.   WHERE is my protection in the court, my answer within the law, as is promised to me, by those AMERICA’S founding documents: people and soldiers died for.  Answer the question.
The court is found in contempt of the law/ found lacking and without honor in the matter of due process/ found in denial of first amendment rights to the people.    The FBI is called to “do what is necessary”:    To prove this democracy still stands.  That means in reality: I do not sue the USA/ I sue the FBI to investigate.  It is then their job to “bring suit” against the government employees/ by providing redress of grievance to the people: that the people will then judge the court and policing agencies  for themselves.  Is it not impossible, for the court and its judge, “to judge itself/ without bias or prejudice”?  Indeed it is/ thereby redress is, “the only means available” for this action to occur.  Someone MUST “police” the reality, FOR JUSTICE: how can that not be “the FBI”.   To Examine and present,  the evidence before us in trial as a nation, and thereby establishing the law as it exists: through redress of grievances as protection of the people.  Is a job within the descriptions of the FBI.

  OUR AUTHORITY as a democracy means:    WE HAVE a literal legal right, thereby WE MAKE a literal legal demand:   to see this evidence of accountability and truth;   “ untainted, by pride, power, or position”;    by our other employees.  We deserve and demand a courtroom for our state and nation, as allowed and described by redress/ whereby we the people shall decide, we shall judge, what is honest and fair.  Under our authority as owners of this land/ this democracy called the state of ILLINOIS, and the United States of America.  Redress is our trial/ our authority as owners: WE DEMAND IT!

   The FBI IS CALLED TO INVESTIGATE, and report directly to the people through this courtroom, and all media plus communications necessary:   to insure the people get UNDERSTANDING, find their knowledge and truth/ and decide for or against:   their nation and their state as is their right.  This democracy calls you the FBI, to protect and defend, these laws, this state, these people, this democracy, and OUR LEGAL rights:   HOW DO YOU PLEAD? 

 

Reply to defendants    III

THE LAW of this land is all the jurisdiction I need.  The enforcement of this constitutional law, establish both as a state law and a national law; through democracy as redress of grievances.   IS INHERENTLY MORE POWERFUL, than any complaint wedged against it.   THE LAW MUST BE OBEYED.
This case literally demands that law shall be obeyed.  It is the jurisdiction of this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THIS STATE OF ILLINOIS, that testifies to that very fact.  The constitution is our democracy/ giving WE THE PEOPLE its jurisdiction;   to demand our legal rights.  It is contempt for the law, that questions jurisdiction: when what is being contested is obedience to that very law.  You have no say:   obedience to the law is final! Denial of the law, is your argument:  that has no merit/ thereby  the judiciary and its accomplices, are called to trial themselves..
This is not an allegation/ it is the primary fact of this case.
The court is bound:   to enforce the law/ it is compulsory, NOT discretionary.  The failure to do so, is a crime.

This US attorney states:   149 F.3d 679, 685 (motion to dismiss under rule 12 (b) (1) “the court is not bound to accept the truth of the allegations in the complaint”   If there is no truth/ there can be no justice!  Is that not true?  Proving contempt for the law, by this 7th circuit appellate court. 

There is no evidence that calls the courts jurisdiction into question!  Hearsay is not enough.  Frivolous and irrelevant cases are not enough.  Feigning ignorance of the law is not enough.  Prove it, under the cause and definitions of JUSTICE, and democracy as it is intended to be.

The defense interjects:   “A different complaint”.  The defense is told:   keep to the law,   You are not allowed to intermix trials,  unless I do.  I refuse.

 

CONCLUSION; 

Having sought the law and protections guaranteed to me under both state and federal constitutions:   the court and the policing as is confined to this state of IL, which does include the federal courts involved and stated in the originating filing.  Have proven to be in violation of due process/ have proven to be in direct rebellion against the constitutional demands of both state and nation with regard to redress of grievances.  Have proven to be in defiance of democracy.  Have proven to be, without honor or the intent and purpose called justice.  The federal district court failed to uphold the law called redress.  The federal appellate court in Chicago proved to be liars, in the case listed as 10-2146;   I paid.  Proved to be liars in  cases 94-1943 & 94-1944 by the judges, creating entire fabrications, completely without foundation or basis or merit/ just absolute fantasies to remove these trials.  And then expelled those cases from the record, to remove the evidence. “But apparently they did” remember/ as is proven by panic!  Trial is found at www.trialforlife.info case abstract, edit for 94-1944
The US SUPREME court proved to be in contempt of due process and the law of this land  in the docketed trial 08-1339.  The previous appellate trial 07-2299 it can be found at www.justtalking.info that had been prepared demanding redress of grievances from the supreme court.  It  was removed by lies, rather than docketed or recognized for justice.  Is that not their job, “for justice”?

There is no possibility of a defense, to the non performance of a contract.  Our agreement with the judiciary is by oath:   you will guarantee our rights in accordance with the constitution, and intent expressed by the three primary documents which are, “our government”.  That contract is broken/ as is the judicial oaths to protect and obey.  Redress is the law/ there is NO discretion,   IT IS THE LAW.

Therefore the FBI is summoned:    To examine and investigate the truth, that is or is not obedience to constitutional law by the court.   Thereby;  Returning this nation and this state,  to its rightful owners; as   WE THE PEOPLE a democracy !   The law rules, not “ our employees”/ there is a difference.
   As constitutional law provides, as redress presents our authority, declared to be:   WE THE PEOPLE /     both state and nation;    to ourselves and this world.  That is the summation of what is expected.

Even so, the legal demand here, by a citizen of both the state of IL and the nation called the United States of America:   is for the guaranteed rights of both constitutions.  It is for REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, as we the people in democracy:   as owners.  That is our right, and it is expressed in a courtroom of law, to establish the firm resolution and literal demand:     FOR CRITICAL AND CLEAR PRESENTATION OF AUTHORITY, to prove it is NOT “the job” of this Federal Bureau of Investigation to protect not only this democracy by establishing what is or is not true, so the people can decide. But to insist the court shall obey its oath, and do its judicial duty: to protect the people and provide their guaranteed rights in accordance with the constitution, both state and nation.  The judicial power does NOT extend to “rewriting the constitution or the law”.  The judicial power is the authority to enforce that constitution and the laws of this land within constitutional doctrine as is designed and established by the three founding documents of this government called the USA.  They are the US constitution/ the bill of rights/ and the declaration of independence.  NO authority exists outside of these documents/ there is no “real government” beyond these documents/ they DO represent OUR GOVERNMENT:    Which thereby controls the foundation and fundamentals to which our employees,  one and all:   must comply.