You have failed in your jobs, which means simply: you are NOT ENTITLED to be paid for complete failure.  That brings us to COURT.  Wherein I will be defending my right to insist:   if you don’t do what you were hired to do/ WHY would I pay you, or any other associate, or leader: FOR THAT FAILURE?  Every aspect in contractual law agrees:   NOT my obligation/ it is yours, to accomplish the work that has been set out before you.  And then you will be paid.  I do not refuse to pay/ I DEMAND YOU SHALL do the work you were hired to do first; and then you will be paid.  “Like any other worker in the nation”!   You are NOT “special, or immune”/ you are a worker, for we the people.  And there are aspects of CRIMINAL CONDUCT surrounding this work, called the governing of this nation.
Therefore redress of grievances according to the first amendment of the US constitution has been established by me: AS THE PROPER course for this hearing.  And that fact is before the US SUPREME COURT currently as trial 11-100. 
You may choose to take me to tax court, as a side issue to this supreme court/ but if you do, it will be added to the above case, as an indication of our employees “even further out of control”/ and acting irresponsibly.  You may not seize my property at this time for non-payment;   as my demand before you is a courtroom to decide what are the CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS OF our employees to this people; called the United States of America.   Because YOU are NOT “the government” !   YOU ARE, “OUR EMPLOYEES”.  And if you don’t do your job/ the job you were hired to do:   as depicted within the constitutional foundation documents/ then  you simply will not be paid.  That is the foundation of contractual law.  And it is current and established in ALL BUSINESS, INDUSTRY, ETC:   AS THE STANDARD FOR WHICH EMPLOYEES SHALL OR SHALL NOT BE PAID.  In court, it will be your job:    “To prove me wrong”.    Not because I say so, but because it is the law.