THIS IS, a Demand for clear and certain, time extension:  on the period of filing past 60 days/ as no opportunity exists to proceed to appellate court, receive their order/  and prepare a new writ within that time frame.  Consequently a thief, and a liar;  will steal my right to supreme court trial/ as has been done by your court before.  Therefore I do demand full access to the court/ proven by the fact of documentation, signed, carrying the seal of the US supreme court which declares:   this case in constitutional law/ judicial subordination under the constitution/  and democracy, as we the people:   shall not be treated with contempt.  Or more simply, no further games in rebellion against this nation shall be played by you.  Make your statement/ prove your adherence to oath, democracy, and law.  Prove, the court shall submit to:  justice!  

 THE Consequence, of this presumptive writ of certiorari, does not contain the order of the court/ or its appeal, because the district court refused to give it.  As it did in previous cases of law. SINCE IT WAS THE US DISTRICT COURT, and their failure to follow their own rules/ denying me for months past a motion for judgment.  Failing to provide an order of the court which could be appealed. Until this USSC writ was undertaken as the means:   to prove the district court must submit an order/ the case is not yet over.  Required because my authority over the court is limited/ it is your authority over the district court, that made them comply.
That order came, and the evidence of consecutive denials (case after case, in constitutional redress law) by every conceivable court in this state of IL and this nation called America an extraordinary writ came to be/ the proof being UNDENIABLE.  The reality being pro se litigation, which means: the strict adherence to procedural rules SHALL BE mitigated by the need for justice.  I come to court demanding constitutional law SHALL BE OBEYED.  Your courtrooms, your authority provided by the constitution to SUPERVISE an control the lower courtrooms in this entire nation: NOW COMES TO REVIEW.  Every courtroom failed to obey the constitution.  Every courtroom failed to defend democracy.  Every courtroom including yours: CHOSE AGAINST, WE THE PEOPLE, as owners of this nation/ and pretends to be our rulers, as if you were judge: rather than the law that is our democracy called the constitution.  That law is NOT DISCRETIONARY/ not under your control.  YOU are under its control/ and the constitution with its foundation documents IS OUR GOVERNMENT, not you.

 Because I was refused the order of the court, I DEMAND an extension of time as will be necessary to produce the document you demand, with its frivolous and irrelevant details.  Previous experience, has proven that without YOUR TRUE AFFIRMATION of a time extension/ regardless of a right; LIARS will rule.  Therefore anything submitted beyond the sixty days will be refused.  Which means, the appellate court is irrelevant/ because they made their decision in past cases; and proved their contempt for democracy and law.   The time constraint means, it cannot hear it; even for the disease and disgrace that will surely come as their order.

THEREFORE CHOOSE FOR JUSTICE/ ESTABLISH FAIR PLAY, AND THE EQUITY OF LAW THAT IS NOT “FAVORED”:  describe and establish the limits and boundaries of justice and fair play for all “pro se litigants”/ that they too, shall have true access to the court.  And prove you will accept the document that shall arrive (after 7th circuit appeals have finished)  in a fair and valid hearing. Without subversion, and criminal contempt: as was done to an alternate case I brought before this court previously, in years past.  When: Clear and certain malice, the true intent and outright destruction of law, was the only purpose or excuse/ ruled the day!
 PROVE:  No excuses,  that the constitution, and its true purpose for democracy and justice:  will rule.

  If you do, I shall appeal in the 7th circuit, as soon as the circuit court, I have been returned too, is done.  If you refuse, it is open defiance and desertion of your duty to this nation;  constitutional law is not a game/ democracy is not your toy. 
Prove sixty days after the appellate court makes its decision, there shall be a true opportunity for writ of certiorari. In this case, and for me as a litigant demanding constitutional justice.  Within the legal boundaries and requirements of all pro se litigants:  as proven by your words.
Regardless of the fact, you owe me, my guaranteed right as a citizen/ the foundation of insult, which is the destruction of law by your procedural rule, without merit/  the critical tyranny of continual courtrooms that fail to obey the constitution/ and the fact of past performance IN THE US SUPREME COURT,  proven to be, in  open rebellion against democracy itself.  This demand recognizes, proof shall be required and pro se limits and boundaries received.  Thereby giving structure without a legal education,  its rightful place in justice for nation and citizen alike.  True obedience to the law, IS JUSTICE.   Not games or procedural vomit as has come from you in the past.

 Prove, YOU THE COURT have met, constitutional demand as is the preamble to that document demanding of all the people: that they shall work for a better tomorrow: for true liberty, and in support  of freedom.   Is what you do!  Prove WE THE PEOPLE, are subject to your rule/ RATHER THAN you, are subject to the constitutional demands made by the people themselves in this contract between WE THE OWNERS:   and you, our employees hired and sworn, to protect/ defend/ and obey our constitutional agreement as a people called this United States of America.

 As this is a constitutional law case, and you have NO right or option or rule or authority to deny its existence, or impede its conclusion in a court of law.  The demand is redress:   a guaranteed right in constitutional law, (the right of the people to intervene and govern themselves).  That is not a question denied by procedure/ it is a question of oath in the court;  prove it is not!  Answer the question.
In review of that demand:  The constitution DOES NOT present any clerk or judge or governmental employee, with the authority, to deny constitutional law.  Redress is plainly written in the constitution as its first amendment/ “you lose”.  Rather “than a fight”, the constitution presents democracy as our authority called WE THE PEOPLE, over you. Or more simply refusal means “YOU go to jail”.  Prove it is not so/ because this case is not about me:   but about what YOU THE EMPLOYEE does owe each and every citizen/ we, the owners;  both access and democracy in our courtrooms.  They are not yours, every court is ours:  we pay/ we decide the truth/ you are the employee.
By the contractual restraints that are within the constitution itself.  A judge has a right to retain his or her position during “good behavior”/ which deliberately means, NOT during bad behaviors; clearly assigning NO IMMUNITY to a judge.  Only the law rules/ not the judge.  No clerk & no rule in competition with the constitution exists in that statement.  It exists to prove JUSTICE/ not rulers in the court shall exist.  Nor does any other statement or form of conduct that contorts the constitution into “something else” assert control. You are not immune, from the act of rebellion: an act deliberately repelling or attacking or defending against the people who are literally demanding the guarantees of a nation to each and every citizen, SHALL exist.  Simply YOU shall obey the law, and accept your oath.  You are not sovereign, the constitution is.   Nor is the court within which you work, or any of its employees.

 A courtroom under constitutional law:  extends justice “to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution”. Not  rules or rulers! JUSTICE, is your job.  The US SUPREME COURT is responsible for justice being done in every courtroom in this USA; their subordinates.  That is your job/ AND you failed. “The congress shall have the power to declare....treason”.  That is their job.  The difference between obedience to your oath/ and refusal to obey the constitution, and honor, protect, and defend OUR democracy;  as you swore to do:   is treason.

Original jurisdiction is applied to the supreme court in this case as presented to the court for its decision:   demanding SET the boundaries and limits between the power of money/ VERSUS the rights of democracy itself:  BY ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONSTITUTION and its foundation documents the bill of rights and declaration of independence.  That decision, has  been summoned from you, to a courtroom before all the people.  As it is the right of the people to know!
The right of redress of grievances, both as a state law, and a federal law:   IS ESTABLISHED, before you; by the facts of every courtroom, and every case I have presented, in both state and nation under your control.   Presented with the irrefutable evidence of trial and by constitutional law: as is redress, proven true.  The people:  FAILED, by a court who has CONSPIRED TO REFUSE AND DENY to this entire people;  THEIR GUARANTEED RIGHT, FROM THE CONSTITUTION FOR THIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; to each and every citizen of which I am one.
ESTABLISHES:  That is REBELLION an act of war against our democracy.  That refusal, is ANARCHY a deliberate decision to destroy a guaranteed right that protects and defends this citizenry from those who would be our “rulers, instead of employees”.  That action in conjunction with numerous other parties, joined together, is TREASON: the formation of an army, whose deliberate actions as proven by irrefutable evidence:   IT IS, the intent TO STEAL DEMOCRACY, by maintaining a force in “high places” to:  beat into submission and control the people, by rules or money or lies;  the threat, spoken or not including prison, extortion, or other punitive measures: to make the people fear.  And they do.
Our democracy returned to us, is a demand of this case:  the constitution is our government, prove it is not so.
A lie is a lie, regardless if it is hidden from view by a rule or an assumption.  Justice is revealed, by the reality of its truth.
It is a lie to assert, that my case as presented originally has insufficient merit to be heard.  Rather it proves failure in the court.  It proves this democracy has traitors within.

 It is a lie, That my extraordinary writ, having proven through the evidence of courtroom after courtroom does not comply with the truth, of a democracy in need. By revealing a conspiracy to deny democracy and its constitutional law,  to this people.   The court FAILS to respect both state and federal redress/ including the supreme court.   And DEFEATS IT BY ONLY BY OMISSION, THE DESERTION OF DUTY, THE CRIMINAL INTENT OF “a drunken mob, who believes they can get away with anything/ so long as they are bound  together”.   Comprising the next case which is treason held before congress to decide.
It is a lie, to assert or complain that a rule has more merit or standing than constitutional rights.  YOU have no case.  It is a forfeiture of democracy to throw aside our need for justice, and descend into the sewer of conspiracy to deny, through the use of rules: this is a demand for ownership as WE THE PEOPLE. Our court and our law providing our democracy as owners.
Had you as demanded, “been very specific” pointing to exact and critical cause why the words of my complaint, the case presented to you:  were not worthy to be heard BY ITS CAUSE:   A GUARANTEED RIGHT DENIED.   So that in extreme detail as would create A PERFECT WORK FOR DEMOCRACY, DEMANDING OF THE JUDICIARY ABSOLUTE PERFECTION, could be had.
Then I would hear your complaint.  You refused, and stepped into the maze of hiding behind rules of procedure even more.  Believing invincible, behind your closed doors.  I suggest, it is not so.  We the people are able to open those doors/ if they so desire.
So now I give you this demand as well:   prove the constitution of this UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its first amendment guarantee of redress/ ITS ARTICLE THREE demand upon the judiciary:   to decide “....between a state or the citizens thereof”.  The state of ILLINOIS has refused to abide by its IL constitution and the fifth amendment therein which is redress/ sending little more than thugs, to throw me out of my courtroom/ OUR COURTROOM, as citizens of this state of IL. Our contract, with our employees, refused. The guarantee of THIS US CONSTITUTION IS:   that you will intervene:  you failed.    Show me where your games (procedural rules) take precedent, over the law.  Show me where a rule destroys a law/ even if the complaint comes “slightly imperfect”.  Prove the law is ruler/ and not this court.   BECAUSE DEMOCRACY MEANS:    WE RULE OURSELVES,   BY CONSTITUTIONAL  LAW.